• Support tellytalk.net with a contribution of any amount

    Dear Telly Talkers. Every so often we ask for your support in the monthly running costs of the forum. You don't have to contribute... it's totally your choice.

    The forums are advert-free, and we rely on donations to pay for the monthly hosting and backup costs. Your contribution could also go towards forum upgrades to maintain a robust experience and stop down time.

    Donations are not to make a profit, they are purely put towards the forum.

    Every contribution is really appreciated. These are done via the UltimateDallas PayPal account using the donation button.

Emerald Point N.A.S. (1983-84)

WeldonBallou

Telly Talk Member
LV
0
 
Messages
86
Reaction score
135
Awards
1
Location
USA
empnt.png

I've only seen 4 episodes of this one season prime-time soap from Richard and Esther Shapiro that aired opposite NBC's Monday Night at The Movies which ultimately cancelled Emerald. Any thoughts on this series?
 

tommie

Telly Talk Hero
LV
3
 
Messages
6,177
Reaction score
8,783
Awards
9
Location
Sweden
Member Since
I dunno
In all honesty, I've tried to start this about two times but I end up getting bored with it.

They seemingly brought in Rita Lakin in the seven last episodes of the series - while she wrote for Peyton Place in its second season and was a showrunner on Flamingo Road, she also did the disasterous season 7B of Dynasty, so who knows if it got better or worse with her revamp.
 

Carrie Fairchild

Telly Talk Enthusiast
LV
3
 
Messages
2,015
Reaction score
4,973
Awards
7
Location
Central Park West
In all honesty, I've tried to start this about two times but I end up getting bored with it.

They seemingly brought in Rita Lakin in the seven last episodes of the series - while she wrote for Peyton Place in its second season and was a showrunner on Flamingo Road, she also did the disasterous season 7B of Dynasty, so who knows if it got better or worse with her revamp.

It was all online at some point and I also tried to get into it a few times but just found it to be a snoozefest. What's left online now is on my watchlist so I might give it another go at some point. I didn't realise Rita Lakin was involved in it. It isn't discussed in her Television Academy interview but she does briefly talk about Dynasty where she says "I wasn't right for Dynasty and Dynasty wasn't right for me" and when asked to elaborate she says "Pass".
 

Willie Oleson

Telly Talk Schemer
Top Poster Of Month
LV
8
 
Messages
18,944
Reaction score
32,577
Awards
22
Location
Plotville, Shenanigan
Member Since
April 2002
I'd definitely re-watch it if all episodes were available.

From the makers of Dinnesty, as the voice-over from Sky Channel used to say.
 

Seaviewer

Telly Talk Champion
LV
7
 
Messages
4,887
Reaction score
8,520
Awards
16
Location
Australia
Member Since
14 September 2001
I remember it. The military background made it different from the other soaps and it introduced the wonderful Sela Ward.
 

GillesDenver

Telly Talk TV Fanatic
LV
0
 
Messages
1,500
Reaction score
2,655
Awards
5
Location
Moldavia
so who knows if it got better or worse with her revamp.
It did not change anything, I can't call that a "revamp".

The show was a bit boring but its main problem is that, aside of the military background, it is completely trite and unspecial. With Dynasty's camp, it would have been fun at least.
 

WeldonBallou

Telly Talk Member
LV
0
 
Messages
86
Reaction score
135
Awards
1
Location
USA
I got a Sue Ellen vibe right away from Sela Ward's character. I thought "really now?"
 

Carrie Fairchild

Telly Talk Enthusiast
LV
3
 
Messages
2,015
Reaction score
4,973
Awards
7
Location
Central Park West
I saw Dennis Weaver being interviewed where they discuss the show. He said that the network were so convinced that the show would be a hit based on the premise and the writing team, that they didn't even ask for a pilot to be shot. They just wanted some scenes to be shot and ordered the show off the back of those. They were shot in May and they wanted the show on air in the Fall instead of mid season, so it was just a rush job after that. As a result of the short turnaround time, a lot of the writers they'd wanted weren't available. He also said that there wasn't even a full script when he agreed to do it. The Shapiros described it to him and it sounded good, so he agreed.
 

Willie Oleson

Telly Talk Schemer
Top Poster Of Month
LV
8
 
Messages
18,944
Reaction score
32,577
Awards
22
Location
Plotville, Shenanigan
Member Since
April 2002
As @James from London has pointed out in one of his reviews, there wasn't much they could do with the design of the show.
It's OK to write shocking storylines for companies, but American institutions like the navy and the army are untouchable. They can never be wrong, and therefore can't be soaped.
And then it feels more like a soap that just happens to happen at a Naval Air Station instead of a soap about the N.A.S. (kinda like the daytime soap CAPITOL).
(not that Dynasty and The Colbys did a whole lot with their companies, but in essence there were no limitations).

Things have changed a lot, of course, and I'm sure that a modern N.A.S. story wouldn't be as conventional as the '83 version (which makes it perfect for a remake).
 
Last edited:

James from London

International Treasure
LV
5
 
Messages
8,263
Reaction score
15,930
Awards
16
Location
Brixton
Member Since
Time immemorial
As @James from London has pointed out in one of his reviews, there wasn't much they could do with the design of the show.
It's OK to write shocking storylines for companies, but American institutions like the navy and the army are untouchable. They can never be wrong, and therefore can't be soaped.
And then it feels more like a soap that just happens to happen at a Naval Air Station instead of a soap about the N.A.S. (kinda like the daytime soap CAPITOL).
(not that Dynasty and The Colbys did a whole lot with their companies, but in essence there were no limitations).

Things have changed a lot, of course, and I'm sure that a modern N.A.S. story wouldn't be as conventional as the '83 version (which makes it perfect for a remake).

Yeah, these are the words what I wrote about Emerald Point about four years ago (which means my five-year opinion licence on it hasn't quite expired):

I think the problem was that the focus of the show was the American Navy -- a real-life, specific, patriotic thing, which you can't critique or parody the way you can the oil or wine or any other kind of big business because then you'd be criticising or parodying America itself which is blasphemy. So you've got this immovable monolith at the centre of the programme, which means all the drama and conflict and juicy stuff is confined the outskirts. It's a bit like Paper Dolls or Models Inc, only in reverse. Whereas the American military is too rigid, the world of fashion is too vague and ephemeral to build a drama around, so again there is nothing at the centre. All the action happens on the periphery and there's nothing in the middle.*

The US navy is an institution so revered on EMERALD POINT that the only characters allowed to criticise it are neurotically unhappy women, unscrupulous businessmen or mercenaries for hire.

*Perhaps the same thing also applies to Footballers Wives. (I once said as much to the actress who played Chardonnay who seemed to think it was probably true, but then she's an exceptionally nice girl so she would.)
 
Last edited:

James from London

International Treasure
LV
5
 
Messages
8,263
Reaction score
15,930
Awards
16
Location
Brixton
Member Since
Time immemorial
Too rigid or too vague?

Vague, cos it'a all about the wives of the men playing football, which ordinarily would be the centre of the drama, but the show isn't interested in that. Instead, it's interested in the ephemeral, blingy stuff on the periphery, which is fine, but it means it's all periphery and no centre. It's like if Dallas was called Oil Barons' Wives.
 

Willie Oleson

Telly Talk Schemer
Top Poster Of Month
LV
8
 
Messages
18,944
Reaction score
32,577
Awards
22
Location
Plotville, Shenanigan
Member Since
April 2002
Vague, cos it'a all about the wives of the men playing football, which ordinarily would be the centre of the drama
Eventhough it's called Footballer's Wives? Doesn't it deliver exactly what it promises? At a time that the wives of footballers became more visible in the media?
Johan Cruijff was a national hero in the 60s and 70s, but no one knew what his wife looked like because it didn't matter back then.

And, for that matter, isn't "Dallas" a bit misleading as a title? The fans certainly think that it should be all about the Ewings and Southfork, but Dallas makes me think of politics and city trouble and infrastructure and what not. Sort of The Wire meets Kelsey Grammer's Boss. And not a pit of broken marriages.
And that's why I feel there's more "Dallas" in new Dallas.
 

James from London

International Treasure
LV
5
 
Messages
8,263
Reaction score
15,930
Awards
16
Location
Brixton
Member Since
Time immemorial
Eventhough it's called Footballer's Wives? Doesn't it deliver exactly what it promises? At a time that the wives of footballers became more visible in the media?

Absolutely. I guess I was talking about why it didn't really work for me dramatically - for the same-but-opposite reason Emerald Point and Paper Dolls didn't either.

Johan Cruijff was a national hero in the 60s and 70s, but no one knew what his wife looked like because it didn't matter back then.

I always thought a documentary series charting the evolution of footballers' wives, back from when footballers hardly got paid and had to do 'proper jobs' during the week and then catch the bus to matches, up to when they became celebrities in their own right, would have been really interesting.

isn't "Dallas" a bit misleading as a title? The fans certainly think that it should be all about the Ewings and Southfork, but Dallas makes me think of politics and city trouble and infrastructure and what not.

I know what you mean, Southfork wasn't even in Dallas! I guess it works because Dallas symbolised the Ewings' ambitions. They were never really interested in being the biggest oil tycoons in the world, just the biggest in Dallas (or maybe Texas).

And that's why I feel there's more "Dallas" in new Dallas.

Yeah, the canvas felt that much bigger somehow. I think the Mexican presence added a different perspective. (And this time, Southfork was in Dallas.)
 
Last edited:

Willie Oleson

Telly Talk Schemer
Top Poster Of Month
LV
8
 
Messages
18,944
Reaction score
32,577
Awards
22
Location
Plotville, Shenanigan
Member Since
April 2002
I guess I was talking about why it didn't really work for me dramatically
The Whomever's Wife who's suffering "because of" is more interesting than the Whomever's Wife who's suffering "just because" (the story is about her).
It's always meatier with the bone still in it, and in Footballer's Wives, the footballers are Footballer's Wives' Husbands!
That said, sport itself is difficult to dramatize, and I think FW did what they could with the business storylines. Tanya Turner was great as the footballer's wife who was desperately holding on to her newfound luxury and status. She made sacrifices, and I like that.
But with much of the focus on the byproduct, it kinda suffers from overexposure.
I guess it's like the difference between a T-bone and a factory sausage. Ha!
I always thought a documentary series charting the evolution of footballers' wives, back from when footballers hardly got paid and had to work 'prper jobs' during the week and then catch the bus to matches, up to when they became celebrities in their own right
Absolutely. Jeffrey Archer's First Among Equals covers the subject of the struggling politician's wives, but the focus is on the men (like The Brothers).
I guess this is the "wives" version of Executive Suite.
1598044898662.png

They were never really interested in being the biggest oil tycoons in the world, just the biggest in Dallas (or maybe Texas).
You're right of course. Dallas was their "Peyton Place" or "Flamingo Road".
It's like when Bobby ordered Ed Haynes to leave what-Bobby-considered-to-be his Dallas. Incidentally, it's a very Dallas-y episode.
 

Carrie Fairchild

Telly Talk Enthusiast
LV
3
 
Messages
2,015
Reaction score
4,973
Awards
7
Location
Central Park West
Regarding Footballers Wives, I think it did what it said on the tin. It was tapping into the Heat Magazine / FHM side of the footballer's private lives as opposed to any major changing room & business dramas. Although I did rewatch some of season one recently and initially there was a bit more of a focus on football but that was mostly gone by season two. Dream Team, which is the largely forgotten other football soap that actually predates FW, did a good job of balancing stories between the footballers and their wives, even if they were more sensational than sports oriented.

This has reminded me of another series that had similar struggles to what you discussed about Emerald Point and it not being able to be critical of an American institution like the Navy. There was a cable drama called Playmakers in the early 00's that followed the lives of an American football team. It was a ratings success but the network cancelled it after one season because of pressure from the NFL who didn't like the portrayal of the player's private lives.
 

Canon

Telly Talk Well-Known Member
LV
0
 
Messages
542
Reaction score
900
Awards
5
Location
Ireland
Member Since
Apr 8, 2004
Dream Team, which is the largely forgotten other football soap that actually predates FW, did a good job of balancing stories between the footballers and their wives, even if they were more sensational than sports oriented.

Dream Team was great, it did become increasingly bonkers as it went on but I don't think it was ever as silly and empty as Footballer's Wives. I think it helped that its early seasons had been grounded, instead of the rich players of the main team, the show focused more on the young players of the junior team and their aspirations to make it. They had no money and lived in digs, it was also still going out in a twice weekly teatime slot at that point which made it feel all the more ordinary.
 
Top