• Support tellytalk.net with a contribution of any amount

    Dear Telly Talkers. Every so often we ask for your support in the monthly running costs of the forum. You don't have to contribute... it's totally your choice.

    The forums are advert-free, and we rely on donations to pay for the monthly hosting and backup costs. Your contribution could also go towards forum upgrades to maintain a robust experience and stop down time.

    Donations are not to make a profit, they are purely put towards the forum.

    Every contribution is really appreciated. These are done via the UltimateDallas PayPal account using the donation button.

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Dead at 87

Frank Underwood

Telly Talk Winner
LV
1
 
Messages
3,834
Reaction score
2,463
Awards
6
Member Since
June 2001
(CNN) - Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg died on Friday due to complications of metastatic pancreas cancer, the court announced. She was 87.

Ginsburg was appointed in 1993 by President Bill Clinton and in recent years served as the most senior member of the court's liberal wing, consistently delivering progressive votes on the most divisive social issues of the day, including abortion rights, same-sex marriage, voting rights, immigration, health care and affirmative action.

Her death -- less than seven weeks before Election Day -- opens up a political fight over the future of the court. Addressing the liberal justice's death, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said Friday evening, "President Trump's nominee will receive a vote on the floor of the United States Senate."

But Ginsburg told her granddaughter she wanted her replacement to be appointed by the next president, NPR reported. "My most fervent wish is that I will not be replaced until a new president is installed," she dictated to granddaughter Clara Spera days before her death.

"She led an amazing life. What else can you say?" President Donald Trump said Friday evening upon hearing about her death. "She was an amazing woman whether you agree or not she was an amazing woman who led an amazing life."

Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden praised Ginsburg as a "giant in the legal profession" and a "beloved figure," saying in brief on-camera remarks Friday evening that people "should focus on the loss of the justice and her enduring legacy."

"But there is no doubt, let me be clear that the voters should pick the president and the president should pick the justice for the Senate to consider," he added, saying that was the position of Republicans who refused to vote on then-President Barack Obama's nominee in 2016.

Ginsburg developed a rock star status and was dubbed the "Notorious R.B.G." In speaking events across the country before liberal audiences, she was greeted with standing ovations as she spoke about her view of the law, her famed exercise routine and her often fiery dissents.

"Our Nation has lost a jurist of historic stature," said Chief Justice John Roberts. "We at the Supreme Court have lost a cherished colleague. Today we mourn, but with confidence that future generations will remember Ruth Bader Ginsburg as we knew her -- a tireless and resolute champion of justice."

Ginsburg, who died on the eve of the Jewish new year, was surrounded by her family at her home in Washington, DC, the court said. A private interment service will be held at Arlington National Cemetery.

Ginsburg had suffered from five bouts of cancer, most recently a recurrence in early 2020 when a biopsy revealed lesions on her liver. She had said that chemotherapy was yielding "positive results" and that she was able to maintain an active daily routine.

"I have often said I would remain a member of the Court as long as I can do the job full steam," she said in a statement in July 2020. "I remain fully able to do that."

She told an audience in 2019 that she liked to keep busy even when she was fighting cancer. "I found each time that when I'm active, I'm much better than if I'm just lying about and feeling sorry for myself," she said in New York at the Yale Club at an event hosted by Moment Magazine. Ginsburg told another audience that she thought she would serve until she was 90 years old.

Tiny in stature, she could write opinions that roared disapproval when she thought the majority had gone astray.

Before the election of President Donald Trump, Ginsburg told CNN that he "is a faker" and noted that he had "gotten away with not turning over his tax returns." She later said she regretted making the comments and Trump suggested she should recuse herself in cases concerning him. She never did.

In 2011, by contrast, President Barack Obama singled out Ginsburg at a White House ceremony. "She's one of my favorites," he said, "I've got a soft spot for Justice Ginsburg."

The vacancy gives Trump the opportunity to further solidify the conservative majority on the court and fill the seat of a woman who broke through the glass ceiling at a time when few women attended law school with a different justice who could steer the court to the right on social issues.

Ginsburg was well-known for the work she did before taking the bench, when she served as an advocate for the American Civil Liberties Union and became the architect of a legal strategy to bring cases to the courts that would ensure that the 14th Amendment's guarantee of equal protection applied to gender.

"I had the good fortune to be alive and a lawyer in the late 1960s when, for the first time in the history of the United States, it became possible to urge before courts, successfully, that society would benefit enormously if women were regarded as persons equal in stature to men,'" she said in a commencement speech in 2002.

Once she took the bench, Ginsburg had the reputation of a "judge's judge" for the clarity of her opinions that gave straightforward guidance to the lower courts.

At the Supreme Court, she was perhaps best known for the opinion she wrote in United States v. Virginia, a decision that held that the all-male admissions policy at the state funded Virginia Military Institute was unconstitutional for its ban on women applicants.

"The constitutional violation in this case is the categorical exclusion of women from an extraordinary educational opportunity afforded men," she wrote in 1996.

Ginsburg faced discrimination herself when she graduated from law school in 1959 and could not find a clerkship.

No one was more surprised than Ginsburg of the status she gained with young women in her late 70s and early 80s. She was amused by the swag that appeared praising her work, including a "You Can't have the Truth, Without Ruth" T-shirt as well as coffee mugs and bobbleheads. Some young women went as far as getting tattoos bearing her likeness. A Tumblr dubbed her the "Notorious R.B.G." in reference to a rap star known as "Notorious B.I.G." The name stuck. One artist set Ginsburg's dissent in a religious liberty case to music.

"It makes absolute sense that Justice Ginsburg has become an idol for younger generations," Justice Elena Kagan said at an event at the New York Bar Association in 2014. "Her impact on America and American law has been extraordinary."

"As a litigator and then as a judge, she changed the face of American anti-discrimination law," Kagan said. "She can take credit for making the law of this country work for women and in doing so she made possible my own career."

Ginsburg, even after her fifth diagnosis of cancer, was working on a book with one of her former clerks, Amanda Tyler. It was based on her life on gender equality.

Dissents and strategy
Part of Ginsburg's renown came from her fierce dissents in key cases, often involving civil rights or equal protection.

In 2007, the court heard a case concerning Lilly Ledbetter, who had worked as a supervisor at a Goodyear Tire plant in Alabama. Near the end of her career, Ledbetter discovered a pay disparity between her salary and the salaries of male co-workers. She filed a claim arguing she had received a discriminatorily low salary because of her sex, in violation of federal law. A majority of the court found against Ledbetter, ruling she had filed her complaints too late. Ginsburg wasn't impressed with that reasoning.

"The court's insistence on immediate contest overlooks common characteristics of pay discrimination," Ginsburg wrote, urging Congress to take up the issue, which it did in 2009.

In 2015, it was Ginsburg who led the liberal block of the court as it voted in favor of same-sex marriage with the critical fifth vote of Justice Anthony Kennedy. Kennedy wrote the opinion and it was joined by the liberals, who chose not to write separately. Ginsburg was likely behind that strategy and she said later that had she written the majority she might have put more emphasis on equal protection.

After the retirement of Justice John Paul Stevens, Ginsburg was the most senior of her liberal colleagues and she had the power to assign opinions when the chief justice was on the other side.

She assigned herself an angry dissent when the court struck down a key provision of the Voting Rights Act in 2013.

"The sad irony of today's decision lies in its utter failure to grasp why the VRA has proven effective," she wrote. She compared racial discrimination to a "vile infection" and said early attempts to protect against it were like "battling the Hydra."

She also penned a partial dissent in a 2012 case concerning Obama's health care law, disagreeing with the conservative justices that the individual mandate was not a valid exercise of Congress' power under the Commerce Clause. She called the reasoning "crabbed" but was satisfied that Chief Justice John Roberts delivered the fifth vote to uphold the law under the taxing power.

Ginsburg puzzled some liberals with her criticisms of the 1973 decision in Roe v. Wade that legalized abortion -- a case that was decided well before she took the bench. Although she said she felt like the result was right, she thought the Supreme Court should have limited itself to the Texas statute at hand instead of issuing a sweeping decision that created a target for opponents to abortion rights.

She was in dissent in 2007 when the majority upheld a federal ban on a procedure called "partial birth abortion." She called the decision "alarming" and said that it "tolerates, indeed applauds, federal intervention to ban nationwide a procedure found necessary and proper in certain cases by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists."

She voted with the majority, however, in 2016 when the court struck down a Texas abortion law that critics called one of the strictest nationwide.

In July, Ginsburg filed another fierce dissent when the conservative majority allowed the Trump administration to expand exemptions for employers who have religious or moral objections to complying with the Affordable Care Act's contraceptive mandate.

"Today, for the first time, the Court casts totally aside countervailing rights and interests in its zeal to secure religious rights to the nth degree," Ginsburg wrote, joined by Justice Sonia Sotomayor. She observed that the administration had said the new rules would cause thousands of women -- "between 70,500 and 126,400 women of childbearing age," she wrote -- to lose coverage.

Friendship with Scalia
Despite their ideological differences, her best friend on the bench was the late Justice Antonin Scalia. After the conservative's sudden death in February 2016, Ginsburg said he left her a "treasure trove" of memories.

She was a life-long opera fan who appeared onstage in 2016 at the Kennedy Center for a non-speaking role in the Washington National Opera's "The Daughter of the Regiment."

At speaking events she often lamented that while she dreamed of being a great opera diva, she had been born with the limited range of a sparrow.

Her relationship with Scalia inspired Derrick Wang to compose a comic opera he titled "Scalia/Ginsburg" that was based on opinions penned by the two justices.

The actress Kate McKinnon also portrayed Ginsburg -- wearing black robes and a trademark jabot -- in a recurring "Saturday Night Live" skit responding to the news of the day.

Ginsburg suffered two bouts of cancer in 1999 and 2009 and received a stent implant in her heart but never missed a day of oral arguments. She was married to Martin Ginsburg, a noted tax attorney, for more than 50 years until his death in 2010 and they had two children.

"I would just like people to think of me as a judge who did the best she could with whatever limited talent I had," Ginsburg said at an event at the University of California Hastings College of Law in 2011, "to keep our country true to what makes it a great nation and to make things a little better than they might have been if I hadn't been there."

Source: https://www.cnn.com/2020/09/18/politics/ruth-bader-ginsburg-dead/index.html
 

Angela Channing

World Cup of Soaps Moderator
LV
16
 
Messages
13,754
Reaction score
25,463
Awards
42
Member Since
1999
Very sad news. I'm not American so her decisions haven't had a direct impact on my life but she was still one of my living heroes.
 

Frank Underwood

Telly Talk Winner
LV
1
 
Messages
3,834
Reaction score
2,463
Awards
6
Member Since
June 2001
Her death -- less than seven weeks before Election Day -- opens up a political fight over the future of the court. Addressing the liberal justice's death, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said Friday evening, "President Trump's nominee will receive a vote on the floor of the United States Senate."
McConnel is such a ghoul. He's also refusing to live by the precedent he set in 2016 when he refused to take up a vote on a Supreme Court nominee during an election year.

Lindsey Graham said at the time “I want you to use my words against me. If there’s a Republican president in 2016 and a vacancy occurs in the last year of the first term, you can say Lindsey Graham said let’s let the next president, whoever it might be, make that nomination." I have a feeling he'll soon be singing a different tune as well.

But Ginsburg told her granddaughter she wanted her replacement to be appointed by the next president, NPR reported. "My most fervent wish is that I will not be replaced until a new president is installed," she dictated to granddaughter Clara Spera days before her death.
Installed? That sounds like a Freudian slip from the late Justice Ginsburg. The correct term is elected, although Dems don't care about fair elections anymore than Republicans.

Ginsburg was on the right side of many issues, but she also had some questionable views. Her friendship with a far right ghoul like Justice Scalia is particularly questionable. She also referred to Colin Kaepernick 's choice to kneel rather than stand during the National Anthem as "dumb, disrespectful, and arrogant." She added that she "strongly takes issue with the point of view that they are expressing when they do that." That's odd, considering the "point of view" they're expressing is that police brutality is wrong. Kaepernick said at the time that it was "disappointing to hear a Supreme Court justice call a protest against injustices and oppression 'stupid, dumb.' "

This isn't meant to take away from all of the good Justice Ginsburg did, but it does show that she had a flawed side that's often ignored as a result of her saint-like portrayal.
 
Last edited:

Frank Underwood

Telly Talk Winner
LV
1
 
Messages
3,834
Reaction score
2,463
Awards
6
Member Since
June 2001
Here's an article that's more even handed when it comes to both the good and the bad of Justice Ginsburg's career. It was released in July:

OPINION: It’s time to end the liberal love affair with Ruth Bader Ginsburg

The United States Supreme Court has been praised by many Democrats for its recent decisions regarding LGBTQ discrimination in the workplace, a Louisiana anti-abortion law and the future of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program.

In all three cases, Chief Justice John Roberts, and, in the LGBTQ discrimination case, Justice Neil Gorsuch, joined with liberal justices Elena Kagan, Sonia Sotomayor, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer in the majority opinion.

Within the same period, however, the Court also ruled to allow the construction of the Atlantic Coast Pipeline underneath the Appalachian Trail and to allow the Trump administration to speed up the deportation of asylum-seekers. Both these decisions saw all five conservative justices joined by Breyer and Ginsburg, who is often lionized as the face of the judicial resistance to President Donald Trump and the Republican Party.

Despite what the mugs and tote bags on Etsy might have you believe, Ginsburg isn’t the most dependable liberal vote on the Court, especially when her record is put next to that of the more reliably progressive Sotomayor, and she has made choices and comments during her term that many on the left would find problematic at best. That’s why it’s time to end the liberal love affair with Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

Ginsburg worked as a lawyer and professor before being appointed to the U.S. Court of Appeals in 1980 by former President Jimmy Carter and to the Supreme Court in 1993 by former President Bill Clinton.

She is most famous for her legal work, both on and off the bench, surrounding gender equality and access to abortion, and her more than two decades on the Supreme Court have seen her become a staunch defender of statutes and laws such as the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965.

Her particularly fiery dissent in Shelby County v. Holder in 2013, which gutted sections of the Voting Rights Act, inspired Shana Knizhnik, then a law student at New York University, to create a Tumblr blog dedicated to the “Notorious R.B.G.,” which was a name meant to compare the justice to the Notorious B.I.G., a rapper. Since then, Ginsburg has been the subject of books, movies and a huge assortment of merchandise.

Idolizing a public figure is always going to be inherently unhealthy, but the idolization of a political figure comes with even more risk. While a singer’s political views have the potential to be harmful to their fans, they’re never going to be in a position to influence the law in the way that someone like Ginsburg is on a daily basis.

When the Democratic Party still controlled the White House and Senate in 2014, Ginsburg faced calls to step down from the Court in order to ensure that she was replaced by another liberal. Encouraged by her fans, she chose to stay on the Court, which, following the 2016 election of Trump, proved to be a risky calculation. Though her health seems to be fine at the moment, Ginsburg is 87, and she has dealt with both colon and pancreatic cancer, broken ribs and a blocked artery during her years on the Court.

Were Ginsburg to die or fall seriously ill, it could have major effects on the Court’s decision making. Allowing Trump to appoint another conservative justice has the potential to put access to abortion, the future of DACA recipients and possibly even the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act at risk. Hindsight is 20/20, but Ginsburg still put the fate of her legacy, and major liberal judicial gains, at risk by not retiring when she had the chance.

The justice’s fans would also likely be shocked to learn that her legal disposition toward equal opportunity and protection under the law doesn’t appear to be translated into her own life. As of 2018, Ginsburg had only hired one Black law clerk since joining the Court in 1993. She also called former San Francisco 49ers quarterback Colin Kaepernick’s protest against police brutality and racial inequality “really dumb” before walking her comments back in an apology.

It is possible to applaud and appreciate Ginsburg’s role in protecting access to abortion, fighting for gender equality and defending voting rights without making her into a larger-than-life figure that evades all criticism. Though you can buy her prayer candle online, she is not a saint, and she isn’t perfect. Pretending otherwise only leads to willful ignorance and future heartbreak.

It’s time to end the liberal love affair with Ruth Bader Ginsburg, but that doesn’t mean we can’t still celebrate her decades of work that has helped move the U.S. forward on so many issues.

Source: https://www.idsnews.com/article/202...-liberal-love-affair-with-ruth-bader-ginsburg
 

Seaviewer

Telly Talk Champion
LV
7
 
Messages
4,887
Reaction score
8,520
Awards
16
Location
Australia
Member Since
14 September 2001
McConnel is such a ghoul. He's also refusing to live by the precedent he set in 2016 when he refused to take up a vote on a Supreme Court nominee during an election year.
Is he even attempting to justify it? Or is it just a given that nobody sticks to their word anymore?
Installed? That sounds like a Freudian slip from the late Justice Ginsburg. The correct term is elected, although Dems don't care about fair elections anymore than Republicans.
Well, there is a three-month gap between the election and the swearing-in. Technically, a president-elect can't appoint anyone.
 

Frank Underwood

Telly Talk Winner
LV
1
 
Messages
3,834
Reaction score
2,463
Awards
6
Member Since
June 2001
Is he even attempting to justify it? Or is it just a given that nobody sticks to their word anymore?
I don't think he cares about justifying it. He has no shame, nor do the MAGA's. They simply want the seat filled, and they couldn't care less if that makes them hypocrites.

Well, there is a three-month gap between the election and the swearing-in. Technically, a president-elect can't appoint anyone.
I've never heard the word "installed" used to describe the president-elect officially taking office. In fact, the Democrats gave it a negative connotation during the Russia-gate hysteria. They insisted Putin "installed" Trump in the White House. Their use of the word suggests it means the president was put in office by someone other than the voters.

Ginsburg also made it a point to say she didn't want to be replaced until the new president is installed. That's an odd thing to say when there's an incumbent in the race.
 
Last edited:

Seaviewer

Telly Talk Champion
LV
7
 
Messages
4,887
Reaction score
8,520
Awards
16
Location
Australia
Member Since
14 September 2001
I've never heard the word "installed" used to describe the president-elect officially taking office.
You're right. The usual term is "inaugurated" I believe. A jurist would be expected to be as stickler for such things. As for "new", it's obviously too much to expect impartiality in these hyperpartisan times.
 

Frank Underwood

Telly Talk Winner
LV
1
 
Messages
3,834
Reaction score
2,463
Awards
6
Member Since
June 2001
Is he even attempting to justify it? Or is it just a given that nobody sticks to their word anymore?
Mitt Romney gave a statement saying "The historical precedent of election year nominations is that the Senate generally does not confirm an opposing party's nominee but does confirm a nominee of its own." That's not what the GOP was saying four years ago, so it sounds like they just moved the goal post. Romney has become a bit of a resistance hero among the Democrats due to his hatred of Trump, but he's still a Republican at heart. It's rumored that Romney is being considered for Biden's Secretary of State, and many of Biden's supporters and advisers are disaffected neocons. Biden is already a conservative Democrat, and the neocons flocking to him can easily bend him to their will.

Even if Trump isn't able to successfully appoint a new Supreme Court Justice, I honestly wouldn't be surprised if Biden himself nominated a conservative-leaning judge.
 
Last edited:

Sarah

Super Moderator
Staff Member
LV
5
 
Messages
8,990
Reaction score
11,980
Awards
14
Location
Ireland (North)
Member Since
1998
Favourite Movie
Silence of the Lambs
Ms Bader Ginsburg's coffin is now reposing at the Supreme Court:


Trump is expected to visit later.
 

Sarah

Super Moderator
Staff Member
LV
5
 
Messages
8,990
Reaction score
11,980
Awards
14
Location
Ireland (North)
Member Since
1998
Favourite Movie
Silence of the Lambs
Although I agree with the booing, maybe not the most appropriate time to be doing it.
 

Seaviewer

Telly Talk Champion
LV
7
 
Messages
4,887
Reaction score
8,520
Awards
16
Location
Australia
Member Since
14 September 2001
A fight would be a pointless distraction. The Republicans have the legal right and the numbers. But their hypocrisy is breathtaking.
 

Crimson

Telly Talk Dream Maker
LV
1
 
Messages
1,801
Reaction score
5,745
Awards
8
Location
Philadelphia
Hypocritical sure, but are we saying that if the situation had been reversed -- a Republican lame duck President about to install a Supreme Court Justice -- that the Left would have just rolled over for it? If so, we may have pinpointed why the Left always ends up looking like a pack of losers. While they're clinging to their high-mindedness, the Right is steamrolling them with their cutthroat realpolitik. The Right's plan to flip the judiciary has been well known for literally decades, and the Left has been impotent to stop it.

If even Trump loses -- and that's shockingly indeterminate -- conservatives got exactly what they wanted from him; the Supreme Court and Federal judiciary has been tilted to the Right for a generation. Maybe the Left can regroup for 2050.
 

Seaviewer

Telly Talk Champion
LV
7
 
Messages
4,887
Reaction score
8,520
Awards
16
Location
Australia
Member Since
14 September 2001
Hypocritical sure, but are we saying that if the situation had been reversed -- a Republican lame duck President about to install a Supreme Court Justice -- that the Left would have just rolled over for it
Who knows? Conventions are maintained until someone breaks them. The Republicans could simply have voted against Obama's nominee. Instead they made up a whole new rule which they're now reversing.
 

Frank Underwood

Telly Talk Winner
LV
1
 
Messages
3,834
Reaction score
2,463
Awards
6
Member Since
June 2001
I used to think it was high-mindedness that prevented the Democrats from standing up to the Republicans, but then I realized it's because they're right wingers themselves. They've helped fast track Trump's judges, they approved his warrantless spying powers, they increased his military budget, and they attacked his foreign policy because they didn't find it bellicose enough! They didn't even fight for their own Supreme Court nominee in 2016 because they so arrogantly believed that Hillary Clinton would win.

Chuck Schumer said at the time that she would pick up two moderate Republicans for every blue collar Democrat she lost. Obama also said that he would have been considered a moderate Republican in the 1980s. That's because the Democratic Party became the 1980s Republican Party beginning with Bill Clinton's "new Democrats." That's why the "Democratic" convention was filled with Republicans. They want a competent manager of the oligarchy and the imperialist agenda, which they get with Biden.

Of course, many solid leftists are enabling it to happen. Either they backed Biden in the primaries because they bought into the "electability" propaganda, or they defend him against progressive demands that Biden serve the interests of ordinary Americans. I've encountered many leftists who admit Biden will only benefit corporate America, Wall Street, and the military industrial complex, but they plant to vote for him anyway. Apparently, you're not allowed to ask for something in return for your vote because of Trump.

Personally, I don't think it's accurate to refer to Democratic politicians as "the left." They abandoned the left a long time ago. Those of us fed up with it are leaving the party.
 
Last edited:

Frank Underwood

Telly Talk Winner
LV
1
 
Messages
3,834
Reaction score
2,463
Awards
6
Member Since
June 2001
Likely Trump SCOTUS Pick Worked To Overturn 2000 Election
Trump says he expects the high court to decide the 2020 election — and if Barrett is appointed, the court will have 3 justices who worked directly on Bush v. Gore

President Donald Trump this week said he wants to immediately fill the new Supreme Court vacancy because he expects the panel to decide the 2020 presidential election.

On Friday, multiple news outlets reported that Trump intends to nominate Amy Coney Barrett, who would be the third justice on the court to have worked for Republicans directly on the Bush v. Gore case that handed the 2000 election to the GOP. She would be the second installed on the court by Trump.

Three years ago, Barrett told the Senate Judiciary Committee that “one significant case on which I provided research and briefing assistance was Bush v. Gore.” She said she worked on the case with the law firm Baker Botts while it was in Florida courts. She declined to detail the scope of her work on the case and for other clients at the firm, saying: “I no longer have records of the matters upon which I worked.”

Earlier this week, Trump refused to say that he would peacefully transfer power if he loses the election in November. He further suggested the Supreme Court will likely decide the election, underscoring the need to fill the seat left open by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s death.

"I think this will end up in the Supreme Court,” he said. “And I think it's very important we have nine justices.”

If Coney is confirmed, she will join two other lawyers from the Republican team that worked on the case that handed the GOP the presidency in 2000.

Chief Justice John Roberts counseled then-Florida Gov. Jeb Bush during that election, according to emails. The Los Angeles Times reported that Roberts “traveled to Tallahassee, the state capital, to dispense legal advice” and “operated in the shadows at least some of those 37 days” that decided the election. Roberts has a long record of working to limit voting rights.

It is a similar story for Justice Brett Kavanaugh. The Miami Herald reported that during the Florida standoff, “Kavanaugh joined Bush’s legal team, which was trying to stop the ballot recount in the state.” Kavanaugh appeared on national television to push for the ruling that halted the statewide recount and handed Bush the presidency.

Source: https://www.dailyposter.com/p/likel...aign=post&utm_medium=email&utm_source=twitter
 
Top