Especially if she was the one who had called it off because Fallon had driven her away--and she comes back at the funeral to be there for Blake. It was always weird that no other woman besides Alexis is mentioned from Blake's pastRegardless of who played her? Would this give more gravity to Blake and Krystle's tension during Season 5?
She was the only one that mattered, and I think it works better for the story because he thought he could never love again.It was always weird that no other woman besides Alexis is mentioned from Blake's past
So, in retrospect, Krystle's story wouldn't be so exclusive anymore. "Been there done that".Especially if she was the one who had called it off because Fallon had driven her away
I don't think Camille Marchetta had "verisimilitude" in her Moldavian vocabulary, so that wasn't an issue.The idea is nice but Daniel was already a man from Krystle's past, I think it would have been VERY odd if at the same time lovers from Blake and Krystl's past have come to Denver.
They were never plans for a spin-off like that--do you mean something else?Well, I'm not sure that it was her idea to make of Daniel an ex-lover of Krystle. In the season bible, he is a new people in town. And he is not the father of Sammy Jo either. I think the Shapiro and/or the Pollocks made the changes when they thought they could do a spin-off with Daniel and Sammy Jo.