Support tellytalk.net with a contribution of any amount
Dear Telly Talkers. Every so often we ask for your support in the monthly running costs of the forum.
You don't have to contribute... it's totally your choice.
The forums are advert-free, and we rely on donations to pay for the monthly hosting and backup costs. Your contribution could also go towards forum upgrades to maintain a robust experience and stop down time.
Donations are not to make a profit, they are purely put towards the forum.
Every contribution is really appreciated. These are done via the UltimateDallas PayPal account using the donation button.
Why would I trust someone or anyone again - they threw away 15+ years to go off and be a "good person". They called me all sorts of things in the process, I genuinely did not do anything wrong. I can barely breathe when thinking about it - it was a good friend, but was it all one-sided? Am...
I said: transing children are wrong and I stand by that. Show me the evidence that it's right and I might change my mind.
People still get angry over this sort of opinion, especially "rights" crusaders.
People are actually horrible. Just imagine people 10x worse than you and there's the thing.
I did literally nothing worse than stand by my principles and I got absolutely shat on, there's nothing like nice people and why do I even bother?
God I wish I didn't have a shit memory but from my absolute horrible recollection, it wasn't as much as evidence of planting as much as clumsy detectives who contaminated things. Then add the racist factor and bingo. You have a planting scenario.
Saying that they fell short (fair) isn't the same thing as saying that they fabricated evidence. And that's what you're saying.
Either way - yes, OJ did it. Far less people have been convicted on less then him. No, that does not mean that the rage against the Rodney King case - or more...
lmao
This would usually not be demonstrable facts when you've decided they weren't. Sorry do you hear yourself and how biased you sound?
I'm sure I can carry out a better investigation by the definition of it being me alone.
But where these reasonable objections or just ones that were exploited at the time because OJ had high-priced lawyers?
OJ got off because he could afford it. It's not justice.
This is exactly the problem - the "police mishandled evidence" thing has been repeated over and over again that people believe it, yet they never question "how did the police mishandle evidence" or "where's the proof of police mishandling evidence". But it's what they've heard years and for...
I don't think so - the season finale was in mid-May and it premiered at the end of September as previous seasons; I think it's more down to the changing fashion in women's hairstyles at that point. I'd imagine it was the usual thing where it was filmed at the end of March/start of April and...
OJ exploited righteous anger over a previous verdict and unfortunately, it worked. Even to this day people won't properly admit they were blind-sided and consumed by what they thought was right versus what actually was.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.