Joan Crawford: The Warner Brothers Era

ClassyCo

Telly Talk Superstar
LV
5
 
Messages
4,490
Reaction score
5,450
Awards
11
Member Since
September 2013
Joan Crawford is one of my favorite actresses. One of things that I like about her best is how her career went through so many different phases. Crawford was career-driven and perhaps more than any other movie star, she fought for her place in the sun. Among all the rest of them, she seemed like she earned it herself because she bypassed and beat all the odds. She was a jazz baby in the 1920s, saucing and dancing the Charleston; became a rags-to-riches Cinderella in the 1930s, playing to Depression-weary audiences; and solidified herself as a clotheshorse in the late 1930s.

Crawford had been with Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer for over eighteen years when she and studio head Louis B. Mayer dissolved her contract in 1943. The official statement was that the exit was a "mutual decision", but one has their doubts. Crawford, for one, had been slightly edged out of her home studio in the early 1940s. Greta Garbo, Norma Shearer, and Luise Rainer had all hung up their coats and took their final bows, and MGM was in an ever-changing process of bringing in newer and younger talent. Women like Judy Garland, Lana Turner, and Hedy Lamarr were getter more attention, although one thinks Crawford was most anxious about the late 1930s arrival of Greer Garson at the studio. Similar to the 1930s when Shearer got all the parts Crawford wanted, now it was Garson getting the roles Crawford felt she was suited well for. MGM fueled Garson's popularity by casting her in prestigious pictures, while the quality and popularity of Crawford's movies was dropping rapidly. I'm sure Mayer had grown weary of Crawford, who was now pushing forty, especially since her films were no longer making money. Crawford probably wanted to leave MGM to get better roles, and MGM wanted her gone so they would quit loosing money.

As it turned out, Crawford leaving MGM was probably the best thing for her. While she was understandably shaken and concerned about loosing the security of Hollywood's Tiffany Studio, she was also very determined to reinvent herself to stay relevant. Crawford's final pictures at MGM had gotten stale and repetitive, and she knew better than anyone that she needed to get out of that rut if she was going to do anything worth her time. Eventually, Crawford signed a contract with Warner Brothers, where she hoped a better future lied ahead of her. She had learned a thing or turn during her MGM days, however, and she turned down several scripts she felt were beneath her and would not progress her career. Crawford also faced stiff competition with other actresses at Warner Brothers, where two-time Oscar winner Bette Davis was the the Queen of the Lot and got the first choice of scripts. Rosalind Russell, Ida Lupino, and Ann Sheridan were also at the studio, and often got roles that Crawford probably wanted for herself.

In 1945, Crawford came across a script for MILDRED PIERCE, a highly sanitized big-screen dramatization of James M. Cain's novel. The part had been originally offered to Bette Davis, but she turned it down. Crawford felt the role was hers for the taking, and she actively pursued it. She had to overcome a few hurtles along the way. Michael Curtiz, the director assigned to the project, was against her casting from the start. As Crawford later recalled, Curtiz wanted Barbara Stanwyck in the role, but she was unavailable and Warner Brothers would not wait for her. Only after Crawford agreed to do a screen test did Curtiz applaud her work and approve of her taking on the title role. MILDRED PIERCE was the perfect vehicle to introduce Crawford's changeover from MGM to Warner Brothers. It incorporated ingredients of her rags-to-riches tales that she had popularized in the 1930s, but with a good dose of film noir's lights and shadows, a sub-genre Warner Brothers was perfecting. The film has so many layers, and one can tell why Crawford wanted the role: we see Mildred rise from the depths of poverty into running a multimillionaire restaurant franchise. She does this all while trying endlessly to satisfy her spoiled oldest daughter Veda, played brilliantly by newcomer Ann Blyth.

MILDRED PIERCE was a runaway hit with critics and audiences in 1945. Crawford received the strongest reviews of her career and she was quickly heralded as a fierce competitor for an Oscar. She received an Academy Award nomination that year, sharing the honor with Ingrid Bergman, Greer Garson, Jennifer Jones, and Gene Tierney. When Crawford won the Best Actress statuette on March 7, 1946, she was famously photographed receiving the award in bed. She was apparently ill the evening of the ceremony and took to her bed. Her adopted daughter Christina later remembered that Crawford faked the illness because of nervousness.

MILDRED PIERCE opened the door to the most successful phase of Crawford's film career. During the late 1940s, she starred in what one commentator called a "series of first-rate melodramas". She was definitely in her element, and she was ushered to the forefront of the Warner Brothers roster. Her next film was HUMORESQUE (1946), in which she chose to star in over the studio's objections. Warner Brothers felt that Crawford, now an Oscar winner, was too big a star to basically play second fiddle to John Garfield. Crawford, on the other hand, knew it would serve her well to be seen with Garfield, who was then at the peak of his success. HUMORESQUE was another big success, with Crawford earning positive reviews. Her next role came in POSSESSED (1947), which was another vehicle that Bette Davis had been touted for first. She had to decline the role because she was pregnant, and Crawford stepped in and received another Oscar nod for her performance.

Crawford was definitely on the top of her game in the late 1940s. This is probably the phase in her career when she was at her finest, at least acting-wise, and turned out several good performances.​

1620913064488.png
 

ClassyCo

Telly Talk Superstar
LV
5
 
Messages
4,490
Reaction score
5,450
Awards
11
Member Since
September 2013
Here is a good little mini-documentary about Joan Crawford and her time at Warner Brothers.​

 

Crimson

Telly Talk Enthusiast
LV
1
 
Messages
2,046
Reaction score
6,632
Awards
8
Location
Philadelphia
I'm particularly fond of mid-era Crawford: MILDRED PIERCE through SUDDEN FEAR. She was still beautiful, but in a flintier way than in her MGM years; yet not the mannish gorgon she became in the mid-50s.

Except for GOODBYE, MY FANCY (Crawford was terrible at comedy) and THE WOMAN IS DANGEROUS (which I haven't seen), I like all of Joan's films from this era. Most of them are preposterous, noir-ish melodramas; which is exactly what I love them. For me, it's a toss-up between THE DAMNED DON'T CRY or FLAMINGO ROAD for peak Crawford. HARRIET CRAIG is underrated and, IMO, possibly the closest to Joan in real life.

crawford-greenstreet-flamingo-road.jpg
 

ClassyCo

Telly Talk Superstar
LV
5
 
Messages
4,490
Reaction score
5,450
Awards
11
Member Since
September 2013
I'm particularly fond of mid-era Crawford: MILDRED PIERCE through SUDDEN FEAR. She was still beautiful, but in a flintier way than in her MGM years; yet not the mannish gorgon she became in the mid-50s.

Except for GOODBYE, MY FANCY (Crawford was terrible at comedy) and THE WOMAN IS DANGEROUS (which I haven't seen), I like all of Joan's films from this era. Most of them are preposterous, noir-ish melodramas; which is exactly what I love them. For me, it's a toss-up between THE DAMNED DON'T CRY or FLAMINGO ROAD for peak Crawford. HARRIET CRAIG is underrated and, IMO, possibly the closest to Joan in real life.
It is probably the best era of Crawford's career. She had matured and was taking on stronger roles. She was still attractive, even as her films took on darker hues. Crawford was perhaps her most attractive during this era as well. I've never been a fan of the mid-fifties switch to the cropped hair and tough face.

A lot of fans and commentaries tout POSSESSED, the 1947 version, as the peak of Crawford as an actress. I must admit she was very good in that film, and it is definitely one of her finest performances. Some critics find her at her most appealing visually in HUMORESQUE, and I can agree with them there. She was beautiful in that movie; the hair, the clothes, the voice. It was all combined in one exquisite package.

I need to seriously revisit this era of Crawford's career. I've only seen pieces of THE DAMNED DON'T CRY and SUDDEN FEAR, which are highly heralded as two of her strongest performances. There was one commentator that said THE DAMNED DON'T CRY summed up all of Crawford's on-screen personas into one role and that she was so committed to what he considered a rather tawdry film. I've often longed to see FLAMINGO ROAD, primarily because of the TV series it eventually spawned, but also because it brought Crawford back together with co-stars and filmmakers she had worked with on MILDRED PIERCE four years earlier.

Crawford was not adept in comedy, but neither was Davis. They stumbled and were forceful in their attempts to be humorous. It just comes off restricted and against their nature. They were both more at home in the soapier, heavier melodramas. That's where Crawford belongs; in those old-fashioned tear-jerkers.
1620924329036.png
 

Crimson

Telly Talk Enthusiast
LV
1
 
Messages
2,046
Reaction score
6,632
Awards
8
Location
Philadelphia
MILDRED PIERCE and HUMORESQUE were 'classier', while THE DAMNED DON'T CRY and FLAMINGO ROAD were seedier. I prefer the later. I like Crawford being disreputable.

Crawford was not adept in comedy, but neither was Davis.

They could both swing a witty line (THE WOMEN; ALL ABOUT EVE), but neither showed any flair for true comedy. Based on GOODBYE, MY FANCY and her LUCY SHOW appearance, Joan thought smiling was the key to comedy. Bette seemed out of her element in her few comedies. In fairness, I suppose, neither ever had a great comedy script or director; perhaps if they had worked with a Howard Hawks or Preston Sturges, they would have risen to the occasion. But, based on the evidence we have, they both appeared leaden in comedy.
 

ClassyCo

Telly Talk Superstar
LV
5
 
Messages
4,490
Reaction score
5,450
Awards
11
Member Since
September 2013
MILDRED PIERCE and HUMORESQUE were 'classier', while THE DAMNED DON'T CRY and FLAMINGO ROAD were seedier. I prefer the later. I like Crawford being disreputable.
MILDRED PIERCE and HUMORESQUE do have a sharper, more mainstream appeal to them. They really read like a heightened rendition of Crawford's MGM Cinderella tales. From what I know, have seen, and have read about THE DAMNED DON'T CRY and FLAMINGO ROAD, they do seem dustier, grittier, and maybe more vaguely realistic. They at least to be reaching for a grittier false reality over the Hollywood glossiness of the other two.
1621012624131.png

They could both swing a witty line (THE WOMEN; ALL ABOUT EVE), but neither showed any flair for true comedy. Based on GOODBYE, MY FANCY and her LUCY SHOW appearance, Joan thought smiling was the key to comedy. Bette seemed out of her element in her few comedies. In fairness, I suppose, neither ever had a great comedy script or director; perhaps if they had worked with a Howard Hawks or Preston Sturges, they would have risen to the occasion. But, based on the evidence we have, they both appeared leaden in comedy.
I am not terribly well-versed on Crawford's venture into comedy. I have seen her appearance on THE LUCY SHOW, which really isn't very good, and her turn in THE WOMEN, which is actually a very good movie. It's probably the only movie I actually really like Norma Shearer in, and I enjoy how Crawford plays a villain with a humorous slant. She also showed she was business savvy by accepting a co-starring role at a time when theater owners had labeled her "box office poison" and she knew she needed a good vehicle to recover her reputation.
1621013041545.png

I have watched Davis in THE BRIDE CAME C.O.D. and THE MAN WHO CAME TO DINNER, and I'd say she does well enough with the material given, but comedy is certainly not her forte. I must give her credit for wanting to diversify, but she was clearly out of her element in those roles. Like you said, she could deliver a witty line on the right occasion, but her efforts in straight out comedy just falls short. She never quite reaches the right marks.​
 

ClassyCo

Telly Talk Superstar
LV
5
 
Messages
4,490
Reaction score
5,450
Awards
11
Member Since
September 2013
Joan Crawford had an affair with film director Vincent Sherman in the late forties and early fifties. He directed her in three films: THE DAMNED DON'T CRY, HARRIET CRAIG, and GOODBYE, MY FANCY. In the biography Turner Classic Movies did on Joan called The Ultimate Movie Star, Sherman said that their affair began before the production of THE DAMNED DON'T CRY. Crawford first made a pass at him when she invited him to her home to meet him directly. She apparently disrobed herself in front of him, and thus began an affair that lasted around almost three years.

Sherman himself made the comparison between Crawford and the title character she played in HARRIET CRAIG, a 1950 film noir that basically told the story of a woman who was more concerned about keeping up appearances rather than the people in her life. Sherman said that was "true in many ways with Joan". A lot of people single in on HARRIET CRAIG as being close to Crawford in real life, and apparently Faye Dunaway drew inspiration from that film for her portrayal of Joan in MOMMIE DEAREST in 1981.​

1621013780228.png
 

ClassyCo

Telly Talk Superstar
LV
5
 
Messages
4,490
Reaction score
5,450
Awards
11
Member Since
September 2013
Crawford apparently called THIS WOMAN IS DANGEROUS (1952) her worst movie. As it has been stated, she hated the script and only did it to get out of her Warner Brothers contract. One film historian called the movie a "tired rehash" of Crawford's earlier successes. It was not well reviewed nor a box office success when it was originally released.

I have not personally seen this movie myself, but I have often wanted to. I consider it something of a hobby to watch movies that are generally not considered to be up to par. I also like to watch movies the actor/actress involved did not like themselves. Watching the movies often answers why they did not like the movie from the start. It's weird, I know, but I like to watch them nonetheless.

She was released from Warner Brothers after filming was completed, and she immediately signed on to star in SUDDEN FEAR in 1952, which generated her final Oscar nomination.​

1621014701950.png
 

ClassyCo

Telly Talk Superstar
LV
5
 
Messages
4,490
Reaction score
5,450
Awards
11
Member Since
September 2013
I saw this HUGE poster of THIS WOMAN IS DANGEROUS at a flea market one day. If I were still into collecting this type of memorabilia, and had I had the proper place to store/hang it, I probably would have been more inclined to buy it.

But it stayed at the store.

1621086588549.png
 

ClassyCo

Telly Talk Superstar
LV
5
 
Messages
4,490
Reaction score
5,450
Awards
11
Member Since
September 2013
DAISY KENYON is one of those Crawford vehicles that I often hear little about. I know she did the film on a loan out from Warner Brothers to 20th Century Fox in 1947, and that film was released on Christmas Day.

There was apparently some shadowy camerawork employed to disguise Crawford's age. She was forty-two at the time, and her character in the movie was only thirty-two. The title role had been originally slated for either Gene Tierney or Jennifer Jones. Crawford's male leads, Dana Andrews and Henry Fonda, were not fond of the completed script, but committed themselves to the project so they could complete their Fox contracts.

I just never really hear a lot about this film nor do I think I've ever seen it on Turner Classic Movies.

Any thoughts on this one?​

1621087108760.png
1621087148001.png
 
Last edited:

Crimson

Telly Talk Enthusiast
LV
1
 
Messages
2,046
Reaction score
6,632
Awards
8
Location
Philadelphia
DAISY KENYON is one of those Crawford vehicles that I often hear little about.

I've seen it and ... I don't remember it. I think that says it all, as I had neither a positive or negative reaction to it. I think I may have found that Crawford and Fonda had no chemistry together, but my impressions aren't that strong. Of Joan's films of the era (1945 - 1952), I think DAISY KENYON is the most middling.
 

ClassyCo

Telly Talk Superstar
LV
5
 
Messages
4,490
Reaction score
5,450
Awards
11
Member Since
September 2013
FLAMINGO ROAD was apparently a production of great importance to Warner Brothers. It was based on a novel by Robert Wilder. Warner Brothers had hoped the film version of Wilder's novel would be a big success, and therefore assembled some of the cast and crew from the Oscar-winning MILDRED PIERCE: Joan Crawford and Zachary Scott were given top roles, Michael Curtiz was assigned to direct, and Jerry Wald was set to produce.

One commentator said that FLAMINGO ROAD was the point in Crawford's career where she started to appear older on film, but also the point where she began to play younger characters. From what I know about the skeleton of the film's plot (I've yet to see it myself), I do think that Crawford was a little old for her character: here she plays a woman named Lane Bellamy, an ex-carnival dancer who marries a wealthy businessman.

The film was released in May 1949. FLAMINGO ROAD received mixed reviews from critics. One reviewer said it was "no fault of Crawford's that she couldn't handle the complicated romances and double crosses" she was involved in within the story. THE NEW YORK TIMES called the movie a "jumbled melodrama", while another source praised the film as "a class vehicle for Joan Crawford, loaded with heartbreak, romance, and stinging violence". FLAMINGO ROAD was quite popular with movie audiences, however, grossing over $2 million inside the United States.

Any thoughts on this movie?

How is it comparable to the TV series?​

1621269356269.png
 

Snarky Oracle!

Telly Talk Supreme
LV
4
 
Messages
16,528
Reaction score
4,258
Awards
13
Location
In that attic above Falcon Crest
FLAMINGO ROAD was apparently a production of great importance to Warner Brothers. It was based on a novel by Robert Wilder. Warner Brothers had hoped the film version of Wilder's novel would be a big success, and therefore assembled some of the cast and crew from the Oscar-winning MILDRED PIERCE: Joan Crawford and Zachary Scott were given top roles, Michael Curtiz was assigned to direct, and Jerry Wald was set to produce.

One commentator said that FLAMINGO ROAD was the point in Crawford's career where she started to appear older on film, but also the point where she began to play younger characters. From what I know about the skeleton of the film's plot (I've yet to see it myself), I do think that Crawford was a little old for her character: here she plays a woman named Lane Bellamy, an ex-carnival dancer who marries a wealthy businessman.

The film was released in May 1949. FLAMINGO ROAD received mixed reviews from critics. One reviewer said it was "no fault of Crawford's that she couldn't handle the complicated romances and double crosses" she was involved in within the story. THE NEW YORK TIMES called the movie a "jumbled melodrama", while another source praised the film as "a class vehicle for Joan Crawford, loaded with heartbreak, romance, and stinging violence". FLAMINGO ROAD was quite popular with movie audiences, however, grossing over $2 million inside the United States.

Any thoughts on this movie?

How is it comparable to the TV series?​


I liked it, but then I liked almost all of Crawford's films from her Warner Bros. era -- similar tone and atmosphere.

Never saw much of the Lorimar TV series, however.
 

Crimson

Telly Talk Enthusiast
LV
1
 
Messages
2,046
Reaction score
6,632
Awards
8
Location
Philadelphia
FLAMINGO ROAD is my default favorite Crawford film, although I might spend some time debating amongst THE DAMNED DON'T CRY and POSSESSED (1947). It's a noir-tinged, soapy melodrama that's grounded and also slightly absurd without delving into camp. If nothing else, Joan is too old for the role; far from being a detriment, it's reflective of her self-made star power. (She might even have pulled it off twenty years later in STRAIGHT-JACKET if the movie itself wasn't so incompetent.)

I've never seen the TV-series. Who played the Crawford role?
 

ClassyCo

Telly Talk Superstar
LV
5
 
Messages
4,490
Reaction score
5,450
Awards
11
Member Since
September 2013
FLAMINGO ROAD is my default favorite Crawford film, although I might spend some time debating amongst THE DAMNED DON'T CRY and POSSESSED (1947). It's a noir-tinged, soapy melodrama that's grounded and also slightly absurd without delving into camp. If nothing else, Joan is too old for the role; far from being a detriment, it's reflective of her self-made star power. (She might even have pulled it off twenty years later in STRAIGHT-JACKET if the movie itself wasn't so incompetent.)
That is the main complaint I've heard about FLAMINGO ROAD; Crawford being too old for the lead role. Apparently Crawford hadn't wanted to do the movie at first. She had found a story called MISS O'BRIEN that she wanted to do, where she would have played a self-sacrificing school teacher. Warner Brothers turned that script down, even though Crawford publicly announced that MISS O'BRIEN would be her next picture. Jack Warner redirected Crawford's attention to FLAMINGO ROAD, and MISS O'BRIEN drifted into oblivion.​
I've never seen the TV-series. Who played the Crawford role?
Christina Raines played Crawford's role in the TV series. I watched a little of FLAMINGO ROAD when it was on YouTube, but I never really got glued to it. I mainly watched it for Morgan Fairchild.

 

Crimson

Telly Talk Enthusiast
LV
1
 
Messages
2,046
Reaction score
6,632
Awards
8
Location
Philadelphia
That is the main complaint I've heard about FLAMINGO ROAD; Crawford being too old for the lead role.

For me, whether she sought the role or it was pushed on her, it fits into the artifice and vanity of Crawford's imagery. Her entire persona during this period is a demimonde between glamourous and seedy, earthy and phony. I find it to be one of the most interesting phases any of the Old Hollywood actresses went through, even though the movies themselves aren't necessarily great. It's not just that it's my favorite era of Crawford, truth be told she doesn't interest me too much outside of 1945-1952. With one or two exceptions, I have no interest in her 1930s work and, except for BABY JANE, even less interest in her post- SUDDEN FEAR career.
 
Top