What was the last film you watched?

DallasFanForever

Telly Talk Supreme
LV
5
 
Messages
22,445
Reaction score
38,806
Awards
17
Location
Bethpage, NY
Dune Part Two (2024)

I wish I could say I understood what this movie was about but for two hours and 46 minutes I struggled to comprehend what I was watching. I won’t say it wasn’t entertaining because it definitely was at times, but overall I didn’t find it to be very good in quality. Part one from three years ago felt like a much better film overall, while this one didn’t seem quite as enjoyable.
 

Oh!Carol Christmasson

Telly Talk Schemer
LV
8
 
Messages
19,835
Reaction score
34,880
Awards
23
Location
Plotville, Shenanigan
Member Since
April 2002
NOPE (2022)

1711757744992.png


The title looks too "cool" for my taste and the brother and sister characters are hm-hm so-so.
The story and cinematography are fantastic and there's never a dull moment. I love the GORDY sitcom tragedy and the chimpansee is played by the chimpansee-impersonator from THE SQUARE.

I guess there's a little bit of HOW TO TRAIN YOUR DRAGON in it, and even though it all looks very wacky it's never at the expense of the sci-fi menace.
And the sounds, oh the sounds. Great stuff!
 

Oh!Carol Christmasson

Telly Talk Schemer
LV
8
 
Messages
19,835
Reaction score
34,880
Awards
23
Location
Plotville, Shenanigan
Member Since
April 2002
Today was an "age disparity" double feature.

THE HUMAN STAIN (2003)

1712515360242.png


Set against the backdrop of the Clinton-Lewinsky scandal (hence the title's double entendre) the story opens with a college scandal based on another word with two different meanings. That is to say, if you're familiar with the slang expression of the word "spook".
While the professor who used the word has a very good case based on common sense, the pressure of political correctness decides that his career as college professor has to be terminated.
Not very cool since he's spent his entire career building up the prestige of said college. Naturally, that itself wouldn't make a genuine racist comment less racist, but that is not the case here.
Or so it seems.
On top of everything, his wife is so upset by the whole thing that she literally dies because of it.

Sometime later, the former professor (Antony Hopkins) befriends a seclusive writer and also begins a romantic relationship with an emotionally scarred and much younger woman (Nicole Kidman).
Initially he contacted the writer to write a revenge-memoir because he felt that the people who voted against him were responsible for his wife's death, but for reasons not stated specifically the project fails to materialise.

The story is interspersed with flashbacks of the younger version of Anthony Hopkins' character and that's when we learn, most bafflingly, that he is in fact a black man with a pale complexion.
This part of the story builds up to a dramatic conclusion while the present day narrative reveals the shocking trauma of Nicole Kidman's character, including a homicidal ex-husband.
Meanwhile, the couple has to deal with the community's disapproval of their May December relationship.

I must say that everything that's happening on screen looks very good to me. Nicole Kidman may not be the most suitable choice for a trailer trash character (to use their own words) but I always like her when she plays "dirty" and she doesn't hold back.
However, to say that there's a lot going on in this story would be the understatement of the year.
There's the story of college controversy and the narrow-minded community, the controversy of the relationship itself, the excruciatingly traumatic past of Kidman's character, and then there's the meatiest part of the white Afro-American man who betrays his heritage for personal gain, and even develops racist feelings against his own race, which retroactively makes the "spook" word controversy interestingly ambiguous.
But this is mostly me reading between the lines, they don't actually do very much with it.
And then at the end the whole story is hijacked by the crazy ex-husband which is actually enjoyable in a FARGO type of twist, but still I feel that the peculiar story of the white black man deserved a much more dramatic payoff.
I think it's a good film about a muddled and ultimately unsatisfying story.


MAY DECEMBER (2023)

1712521576904.png


I guess it's better not to say too much about the story of this new-ish film so I'll just describe it as a drama with dark and tragic undertones.
And I mean very subtle undertones because nothing is being spelt out.
If this would describe all of the film then I'd say "fantastic!", but it's also got some satirical undertones that gave the false promise of something slightly more outlandish.

Julianne Moore - who already has a flair for "nouveau camp" - tells her somewhat plump daughter "I'm so proud of you that you're not afraid to show your arms in that dress. You are a modern woman".
And then the daughter, initially ecstatic about her choice, returns to the changing room to try on another dress - with sleeves, of course.
The MAY husband tells his father that it's going to be very quiet now that the children are going to leave their home.
His father comforts him by saying that he'll have more time to focus on other things, to which the non-smoking son responds with ligthing a cigarette, followed by a close-up of the father's ashtray filled to the brim with cigarette butts.
That's not drama that's satire. And there are many more examples.

I don't have anything against satire - on the contrary - but it made me feel as if something was missing here. Something like. for example, the frog rain in MAGNOLIA.
But if I'm willing to overlook that one missing ingredient that could make it look more complete then I'd say this is a very good film. Even the score from the GO-BETWEEN seems to work better in this one.
 

Marley Drama

Admin
LV
14
 
Messages
13,963
Solutions
1
Reaction score
28,318
Awards
33
Member Since
28th September 2008
Prometheus (2012)



This one's been on my radar for a while. Alien is a sci-fi horror favourite, so Ridley Scott returning to that universe for the first time since 1979 had me excited and, frankly, elevated my expectations considerably.

To offset this I was aware that this isn't an Alien film per se, but rather a story that exists in the same universe at an earlier point in time. Even so, I found myself actively looking for things that tied this to the original film... and it certainly wasn't difficult to find stuff. If I'd watched unaware of the link, I'm sure I'd have felt that this film was heavily influenced by Alien. Prometheus certainly hits many of the same notes as the original and embraces its themes.

All the same, what was most impressive about this Alien-adjacent project was the degree of world-building taking place. New concepts, ideas and innovations are to be found left, right and centre, and the balance between the familiar and the new was spot-on. There's obviously more CGI than in 1979's Alien, but it seems to be used relatively sparingly and stops short of unnatural artifice. It's most noticeable during scenes featuring holograms and suchlike, when one would expect it to look artificial. For the rest of the film there seem to be plenty of practical sets and effects.

The film is fairly well-cast, with the standout being Michael Fassbender whose performance speaks for itself.

As evil corporation head Peter Weyland, Guy Pearce's pretty features were hidden beneath a ton of ageing-up prosthetics (to the point he resembled Patricia Hayes). He was great in the role, but his moment to shine actually came in a scene not used in the film. The much younger Weyland's 2023 TED Talk was part of the film's viral marketing campaign:

In short, Prometheus has made me hungry to watch Covenant and (eventually) Romulus.​
 

Oh!Carol Christmasson

Telly Talk Schemer
LV
8
 
Messages
19,835
Reaction score
34,880
Awards
23
Location
Plotville, Shenanigan
Member Since
April 2002
ANATOMY OF A FALL (2023)

1713138384742.png


A title with a double meaning, or at least that's how the story plays out.
I think it's a very atmospheric and tense drama with terrific performances, and its 2,5 hours running time never got in the way of my viewing pleasure.
On the other hand it's the kind of film that I only need to watch once. But that's how people use to do it in the days without video, unless the film was shown on television.
 

Marley Drama

Admin
LV
14
 
Messages
13,963
Solutions
1
Reaction score
28,318
Awards
33
Member Since
28th September 2008
Alien: Covenant (2017)



For context, I actually watched this at the weekend but I'm only just getting round to writing about it. Even after a relatively short time, memories get a little fuzzy and logic takes over due to (over)thinking time. For these reasons, I find my views on Covenant perhaps a little harsher than they might have been three days ago.

The not so good news with this film is that it disappointed. It wasn't big time disappointment - there's a lot to enjoy and it's certainly mostly a well-made film - but there's just an underlying feeling that it could have been better.

The casting is mostly fine (if one can get past ghastly Jussie Smollett's presence).

If Prometheus was Alien without the Xenomorph, Covenant feels rather like Ridley Scott's take on 1986's Aliens, with elements of Alien 3 and Resurrection thrown in for good measure. In this regard I'm reminded of how Halloween's 2018 reboot was a top-notch tribute to the spirit of the original while the follow up films delved tonally into the numerous Halloween sequels and were all the poorer for it.

There's (1986's) Aliens' big stakes, with threat on a world scale and a large cast of characters armed with guns and whatnot. But this means there's also (1986's) Aliens' boisterousness and muscle flexing The good news being that this being Ridley Scott instead of Cameron and Hurd, Covenant mercifully lacks the air of chest-puffing, gum-chewing swaggering conceit that I find such a turn-off in Aliens, well-made and revered as it is.

The new planet with its inbuilt threat and old-world feel conjures up Alien 3 (and probably some of what makes that film work for me). More controversially, Covenant takes a leaf from Alien 3's book by killing off one of its primary protagonists off-screen between films. It's a decision I cheered in Alien 3, Newt's incessant, annoying high-pitched scream having been one of the main reasons I find Aliens so intolerable. I'm less enthused about the similar choice in Covenant, though this stems less from attachment and more from disappointment at having to start this angle from scratch... again.

There's also Resurrection's themes of experimentation as a means of speeding up evolution.

Also in common with the original sequels is the "give 'em what they want" approach with the alien itself. When the xenomorph does show up, it's more in-your-face than it should be: on screen and nicely lit. What makes the original Alien the best of the films - still - is that it kept the alien in the shadows, where it's never been more terrifying.

It's said that Ridley Scott understandably wanted Covenant to be a direct continuation of Prometheus, with a focus on AI (embodied by David) as the key threat and that he did not plan for the Xenomorph to even feature until there was interference from The Powers That Be based on feedback from Prometheus. Understanding this helps make sense of Covenant. It does pick up Prometheus's themes and run with them. There's also alien horror action. Neither quite achieves its potential because there's a sense of two differently toned films playing out at the same time, but a few days on, it's the Prometheus stuff that lingers in the mind, while the xenomorph stuff is already forgotten. That's where the interest lies.​
 

Treeviewer

Telly Talk Warrior
LV
8
 
Messages
5,356
Reaction score
9,303
Awards
18
Location
Australia
Member Since
14 September 2001
Alice in Wonderland (1931)
Alice in Wonderland (1910)
Having watched the 1915 version, YouTube naturally offered up some more. The 1931 version is a talkie with a theme song by Irving Berlin no less, while the 1910 one , although only ten minutes long, has the distinction of being made by Thomas Edison - or at least his company.
In common with remakes up to the present, they leave out parts of the story and substitute sequences of their own device, sometimes insisting on finding some rational meaning to the nonsense in much the same way as the 1939 Wizard of Oz introduces Dorothy's acquaintances before they transform into the characters of her dream. And successive screenwriters persist with the hubris that can improve on Carroll's original dialogue .
 

Jolly Jimmy Tinsel Todd

Telly Talk Mega Star
LV
4
 
Messages
3,134
Reaction score
6,298
Awards
9
Location
United States
Member Since
2019
I just saw Now, Voyager, which I enjoyed much more than I thought I would. I haven't seen too many Bette Davis movies, but now I want to see more, particularly Dark Victory.

I've seen Whatever Happened to Baby Jane a few times, and I've see All About Eve once. The latter I want to see again. Now, Voyager is the first I've seen of her earlier pictures. I now totally get the fascination people have with her.
Any suggestions on Bette's movies I should see?

1713614192270.png
1713614192314.png
 
Last edited:

Marley Drama

Admin
LV
14
 
Messages
13,963
Solutions
1
Reaction score
28,318
Awards
33
Member Since
28th September 2008
Sparrows Can't Sing (1963)




She was able to display some competent acting skills in the early career such as in the film Sparrows Can't Sing , which earned her a BAFTA nomination, so even the industry recognised her abilities as an actress.


This film's been on my radar for many a year, so I'm delighted to be able to say I've now watched it... and in glorious high definition.

What a fascinating film. It captures a moment in time like very few films do with any success. The use of genuine East End characters as extras and secondary characters. The location work on an area that was evidently still recovering from the after effects of war, but which has now largely been redeveloped and gentrified, make this one of those wonderful social documents of along with the likes of Ealings such as Hue & Cry or Went The Day Well. Very much in common with Till Death Us Do Part, its backdrop shows us the practical realities of working class families being moved from condemned two up/two downs to brand new high rises, considered at the time to be the height of modernity, offering new hope with luxurious assets such as indoor toilets and lifts.

Multiculturalism is celebrated in the most low-key way, being presented as part of the city's cosmopolitan vibrance. There's a terrific scene where James Booth nips up and down the stairs of a block, opening the door to different living spaces, each appearing as a welcoming exotic window to a different culture.

There's a darker edge to the film but, for better or worse, the hopeful ebullience makes it palatable. There are undercurrents of violence, with Booth's character returning from sea having left Babs with serious injuries from a beating (in the original play he was returning from serving prison time for that very act), but it's told so matter of factly that it's accepted as the reality with which these characters live (which I find far more potent than had it been presented as an "issue"). I'm sure oversensitive younger viewers might be triggered by Babs receiving wolf whistles as she walks along the street, but she simply soaks it all up and then sticks out her tongue, thumb to the tip of her nose while waggling her fingers in front in a "nyaaa nyaaah" gesture. It's endearing, and serves as a grounded precursor to the similar treatment she'd receive on a regular basis in the Carry Ons. More fascination comes from scenes filmed in the Krays' nightclub (they were friends of Barbara's and, as is relayed in the bonus features, also paid visits to the set and even arranged security for cast and crew).







Stephen Lewis wrote Sparrows Can't Sing (which I've never seen but have read good things about. My fascination with British films of this era means it's on my viewing bucket list).


The very young Stephen appears as well, as does his future sparring partner and co-scriptwriter Bob Grant. There are a host of familiar character actors, many of whom would later become household names through sitcoms: Brian Murphy is here, with best friend Roy Kinnear and Yootha Joyce. There's Victor Spinetti. Harry H. Corbett. Fanny Carby. Arthur Mullard and Queenie Watts.

It's a proper who's who of British light entertainment, and I would think that any "six degrees of separation" of actors from this era can be made significantly shorter by visiting this film.




I love this song:

It's gorgeous (and I've just seen that it's on iTunes).

In the bonus features, Barbara says that Joan Littlewood showed Lionel Bart (another East Ender) a cut she'd made of the film (after using certain connections to pinch it from the studio to stop The Powers That Be taking the heart out of it). Afterwards, Lionel told Barbara "I'll write you a song" then went away and came up with this.


Actually, the bonus material is fascinating. I haven't watched it all yet, but the "then and now" locations featurette is great, and the BFI Q&A with Babs and Murray Melvin is fantastic. They tell of Joan's dislike of actors who were too professional. She liked them to have a certain rawness and sacked a technician for trying to polish Barbara's performance.

They also tell a great story of Joan's aversion to awards ceremonies. When she received a lifetime achievement BAFTA, it was insisted that she attend, and her acceptance speech was "I know why you've given me this. It's because I stayed away". Apparently she immediately dumped the award in a Sainsbury's carrier bag and told someone to "take the f*cking thing to Stratford. It'll do as a doorstop".

I hadn't realised this was also the first English language talkie to receive English subtitles in American screenings.

There's a charming moment where Barbara invites June Brown to say something from the audience, prompting June to admit that she hasn't been able to hear a word they've said.
 

Treeviewer

Telly Talk Warrior
LV
8
 
Messages
5,356
Reaction score
9,303
Awards
18
Location
Australia
Member Since
14 September 2001
Corsair (1931)
I've been on something of a Thelma Todd kick recently - watching the DVDs of the comedy shorts she made for Hal Roach.
This is a more dramatic affair involving stock market fraud and maritime hijacking but she never quite loses the playful persona.
 

Crimson

Telly Talk Enthusiast
LV
1
 
Messages
2,085
Reaction score
6,737
Awards
8
Location
Philadelphia
Today I watched ALIEN (1979), re-released to theaters for its 45th anniversary. It's a strong contender for my favorite film and I've been eager to eventually see in on the big screen. The experience did not disappoint!

Aside from being such an effective sci-fi horror, it's remarkable how well ALIEN has aged. Vintage sci-fi rarely ages well, at least visually. No matter how futuristic STAR TREK or LOGAN'S RUN tried to look, they are so aesthetically rooted in the 60/70s. Even Luke Skywalker's hair screams 1970s. ALIEN has few such visual queues. Hair is unstyled, clothes are drab and utilitarian, sets are dingy and industrial, special effects are used discretely. Only the technology, with its primitive graphics and CRT screens, betrays any age but even that works just fine since the Nostromo is meant to be an old ship.
 

Marley Drama

Admin
LV
14
 
Messages
13,963
Solutions
1
Reaction score
28,318
Awards
33
Member Since
28th September 2008
The Good Neighbour (2016)



Not a film I'd heard of. It came up last night as a "film we think you may like" suggestion on Prime. I glanced over a couple of sentences summarising the premise, clicked away unimpressed but somehow ended up coming back to it as the least worst option. I'm sure the low expectations helped.

Thinking back to the film, the Hitchcock parallels are many. The one that leapt out at me was the conspiratorial relationship between the two leads echoing that in Rope, with one being more timid and sympathetic while the other is shown as overconfident and willing to go much further (the latter element is explored and explained more here than in Rope, though isn't necessarily any better for doing so). There's the voyeuristic element of most Hitch films, but especially Rear Window. And there's the obligatory Psycho reference with hints of a secret waiting to be discovered in the basement.

The production, though, goes for slick 21st Century, with numerous flashbacks and flash-forwards spliced into the key story, dialogue that seems intended to be über-naturalistic, much of the story shown via cuts between the characters' own various cameras and (of course) the found footage element. The latter elements make this feel closer in practice to the likes of The Blair Witch Project than anything Hitchcockian, and this comes with the same baggage in the form of characters who are frequently brash and unlikeable making bad choices.

James Caan is always worth his weight in gold, and this is one of his more intriguing performances since he spends much of his screen-time alone at home, doing very little and unaware he is being watched. He doesn't have a great deal of dialogue, but still manages to be the best thing in this. Mindy Sterling was great as well. I actually convinced myself she was Lily Tomlin and at one point found myself reflecting that I hadn't realised before just how good an actress she (as in Lily) was.

It's a decent enough little film - especially, as mentioned, with expectations kept low - and has enough turns to keep the viewer invested. The suspense was also very well done: my heart was racing during a couple of scenes.​
 

Treeviewer

Telly Talk Warrior
LV
8
 
Messages
5,356
Reaction score
9,303
Awards
18
Location
Australia
Member Since
14 September 2001
Cheating Blondes (1933)
Two Thelma Todds in this one. Anne is accused of murder and hides in plain sight posing as her twin sister Elaine, a showgirl who has dropped out of sight for her own reasons. Todd is not Bette Davis but she pulls it off well enough.
 

Oh!Carol Christmasson

Telly Talk Schemer
LV
8
 
Messages
19,835
Reaction score
34,880
Awards
23
Location
Plotville, Shenanigan
Member Since
April 2002
HALLOWEEN ENDS (2022)

1714607346005.png


I was in the mood for something new and familiar, and HALLOWEEN ENDS seems like the perfect choice for some "comfort horror". I have seen the original, at least one sequel from the 1980s and also the one from the late 1990s - which means that this is my first 21st century Halloween film.

Babysitter Corey Cunningham accidentally kills the "baby" which could have been a terrific drama in itself, but at the same time it also looks like a dark comedy "oops!" moment. I honestly don't know if we were supposed to feel sorry for the nasty little brat.
In the next scene we see Corey on his bike and I figured it was going to be one of those "one week earlier" kind of narratives, but it isn't, and the accident mostly serves as a backdrop, a new piece of Haddonfield history to build on.

It's clear that Corey has become quite the underdog who's just trying to keep his head down, further hammered home by his quirky-overbearing mother (although it made me giggle when she said "who's that calling you under the dinner table?").
Meanwhile, Laurie Strode is writing her memoir Serial Dearest and she's living with a young woman named Allyson who turns out to be her granddaughter.
Via-via Allyson and Corey meet and a romance develops even though Corey thinks that kind of life isn't meant for him.
She takes him to a Halloween party - she's dressed like Catwoman - but later that evening Corey has an emotional run-in with the mother of the boy who was killed.
On top of everything he is ambushed by a group of troublesome teenagers who throw him off the bridge and leave him for dead, but then an unseen person drags him away.

Funnily enough, this sequence - and the way it would transform his character - reminded me of Selina Kyle who was pushed out of the window, sort of died and then resurrected by the cats which would turn her into the iconic super anti-hero.
Corey's confrontation with Michael Myers who's secretly living in the sewers (hello, Penguin) followed by the stabbing of a vagrant (although not entirely without self-defence) has a similar effect on him.
There's even a scene that suggests some kind of super power.
1714610486230.png

1714610506963.png


After a confontation with Allyson's romantic pursuer Corey lures him to Michael's hiding place and the man gets stabbed to death.
It seems that the bloodshed awakens Michael, as if he had been a dormant vampire patiently waiting for his next bite.
This is where the slasher part takes off except that we have now a serial killer duo, and not in a mysterious way like the SCREAM movies.
However, since the killings are a big part of the thrill it didn't bother me that much, and the meatiest drama is still about Laurie and her role in the various tragedies - here and in the previous chapters (which kinda made me wish I had started from the very beginning, and maybe I'll do that anyway).
Jamie Lee Curtis really throws herself into it and there's even a moment that suggests that Laurie had killed herself à la JR in the last scene of DALLAS.
Michael and Laurie's final battle is quite satisfying - naturally it takes him forever to die - and in case they used a stunt double for JLC then they've done a terrific job obscuring it.

All in all an entertaining film but the killings could have been a bit more brutal.
 
Top