I was a kid in the 80s and sometimes I would see bits of Cagney and Lacey, although only the later seasons because I would have been sent to bed by the time it came on for the early shows. It was a giant hit in the UK - I think my mum (blonde and pretty) sometimes took inspiration from Sharon Gless' clothes and my grandma thought she was 'smashing' (or some such adjective) too.
I decided to watch it from the pilot to the finish recently; partly out of general nostalgia and curiosity but with some more specific nerdy reasons too.
Specfically:
- I thought it would be interesting to see New York City street scenes from 1981-1988, a time and place I am utterly fascinated by.
- I thought it would be interesting to see how fashion and the overall aesthetic of the world around us changed. Cagney and Lacey had so many episodes that you can see the 80s unfold in real time.
- The real-time element gives a taste of a social history of the period too.
There is a big problem with the first of those - because after all the wonderfully authentic shots of Chinatown and Manhattan in the early episodes, they moved the whole thing to LA. Regardless of cost, I still feel that was a bit unforgiveable. The show was so rooted in New York dialect, food, culture it loses something the moment they take it out of its environment. If they could have used Manhattan in later series for some of the scenes it really would have added to things. Sometimes in the pseudo-NY streets they choose to look like Manhattan you can see a stray palm tree in the background and the spell is broken.
Anyway, thanks to The Internet Archive I have now watched eveything from the pilot up to Season 5 Episode 5. It has felt quite a mad and eccentric quest to make myself watch all of it from start to finish, so imagine how thrilled I was to find
@Mel O'Drama 's excellent episode reviews, which I now read after I have finished an episode. They are very well-written - congratulations.
The best thing about the show is Tyne Daly and i get the feeling most people agree with me about that. Some of her performances are brilliant in their nuance, range, delivery, emotion. I had no recollection that she was such a wonderful actor but she is a phenomenon. I liked Meg Foster in Season 1, more than Loretta Switt in the pilot, but when Season 2 kicks in Sharon Gless feels like she is the right hand for the right glove. However... I feel that while Gless is varying in tone in S2 and S3, about halfway through S4 she starts to deliver all of her lines at NINETY DECIBELS and spends a lot of the time punching things and overacting. This has largely continued into Season 5. Another poster here commented that she has become quite unlikeable much of the time by now.
Perhaps another criticism I have is that the show does feel like it has a bit of avocado syndrome about it. You know when you have an avocado in the kitchen and you have to wait days for it to ripen or its hard and raw, but if you miss the tiny one day 'just right' window if goes all black and you have to throw it in the bin? I am getting hints of that with C&L. In Season 2 it felt like the show still hadn't quite found its legs and was very patchy and a bit underwritten. Then in Season 3 it gets a bit riper but not quite ready to eat, then in Season 4 it's ripe for a few episodes and fully edible, before at the end of Season 4 they have added insane amounts of underscoring to the show and Gless is barking out the script like a Julius Ceaser speech and we have reached overipeness. Please tell me I'm not stuck with the underscoring all the way until the end of Season 7!
So, a few criticisms there, but don't get me wrong, it's been a very worthwhile venture so far and I will watch every last second of the series and the TV movies too. There is much to enjoy - especially the best bits of dialogue between Daly and Gless which are sometimes stupendous.
That's my twopenneth so far then.