It's Official: President Joe Biden Drops Out Of 2024 Presidential Race

Frank Underwood

Telly Talk Champion
LV
3
 
Awards
9
This certainly isn't surprising, but the worst part is having to listen to Biden sycophants heap undeserved, faux praise on him. Newsom clearly wants to be the Dem nominee.

Not that Republicans are any less self-serving, of course. They're demanding that Biden resign now, despite the fact that he has only six months left to serve.

Leave it to the opportunistic bastards on both sides of the aisle to use this to their advantage.

Biden, after a five-decade career, faced a reckoning over his age and his ability to defeat Trump. He endorsed Vice President Kamala Harris as his party faces a historic effort to replace him.

WASHINGTON — President Joe Biden announced Sunday that he will end his presidential re-election campaign, bringing an abrupt and humbling conclusion to his half-century-long political career and scrambling the race for the White House just four months before Election Day.

Biden, 81, could not reverse growing sentiment within his party that he was too frail to serve and destined to lose to Donald Trump in November. He backed Vice President Kamala Harris to replace him as the Democratic nominee.

“While it has been my intention to seek reelection, I believe it is in the best interest of my party and the country for me to stand down and to focus solely on fulfilling my duties as President for the remainder of my term,” Biden wrote in a letter posted on X. “I will speak to the Nation later this week in more detail about my decision.”

Biden thanked Harris for “being an extraordinary partner” in his letter and then endorsed her in a subsequent post.

"My very first decision as the party nominee in 2020 was to pick Kamala Harris as my Vice President," Biden posted. "And it’s been the best decision I’ve made. Today I want to offer my full support and endorsement for Kamala to be the nominee of our party this year."

His withdrawal caps a singular national political career, bookended by Richard Nixon’s fall and Trump’s rise. He mounted four presidential bids. He spent 36 years in the U.S. Senate representing tiny Delaware. He rose to the chairmanships of the powerful Judiciary and Foreign Relations committees. And he served eight years as Barack Obama’s vice president.

Reactions from politicians quickly began pouring in.

California Gov. Gavin Newsom wrote in a post on X that Biden “has been an extraordinary, history-making president — a leader who has fought hard for working people and delivered astonishing results for all Americans.”

“He will go down in history as one of the most impactful and selfless presidents,” said Newsom, who was one of the most prominent Biden surrogates. Newsom has also been floated as a possible Democratic presidential contender.

The president's granddaughter Naomi Biden said in a post that she was “nothing but proud today of my Pop,” adding that he has “served our country with every bit of his soul and with unmatched distinction.” First lady Jill Biden posted her husband’s statement to X with a heart emoji.

Across the aisle, Republicans slammed the move and many called on him to resign his office, days after the completion of a Republican National Convention where speaker after speaker slammed the Biden-Harris ticket.

Sen. Josh Hawley of Missouri was one of the Republicans calling on Biden to resign, writing in a post, “If you can’t run a mere political campaign, you can’t be President.”

Biden’s decision to exit the race less than a month before his party’s convention and a few months before voters head to the polls is unprecedented in the modern political era. The last sitting president to abandon a re-election bid was Lyndon Johnson, whose expansion of the Vietnam War in the 1960s split the Democratic Party. But Johnson’s announcement came in March 1968 — eight months before that election.

“We’re in uncharted waters,” said Barbara Perry, a presidential studies professor at the University of Virginia’s Miller Center. “No president has dropped out or died this close to the convention.”

Replacing Biden atop the Democratic ticket is likely to set off internal Democratic tremors as ambitious officials maneuver to become his successor. Factions have already formed around Harris and prominent governors, including Michigan’s Gretchen Whitmer and California’s Gavin Newsom.

Harris would seem to be the heir apparent. She broke a barrier as the first female vice president. A woman of color, she enjoys strong support among African Americans, a loyal piece of the Democratic coalition. Overall, though, Harris’ approval rating stood at only 32% in an NBC News poll released earlier this month.

“There’s no one you can name right now who is an obvious substitute,” Perry said. “That’s what makes this so uncertain and chaotic.”

The mechanics of putting a new name on ballots also gives rise to myriad legal questions. Republicans could work to throw obstacles in the nominee’s path by mounting legal challenges aimed at keeping that person off the ballot.

Source: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/20...biden-drops-2024-presidential-race-rcna159867
 
Last edited:

tommie

Telly Talk Hero
LV
3
 
Awards
9
Oh wow. If only they'd have listened to people who said he was a confused mess so that they could mount a full election cycle, eh?
 

Julia's Gun

Telly Talk Well-Known Member
LV
3
 
Awards
10
This is wonderful news, am sure a series of events will ensure a surprise candidate defeats Trump and America - and the world- are saved from oblivion. You couldn't make it up.
 

Frank Underwood

Telly Talk Champion
LV
3
 
Awards
9
The Democrats are pushing us towards oblivion now. The last four years have been comprised of more war and worsening economic conditions for the lower classes.

Dems also deprived voters of a meaningful primary, assured the public that Biden was mentally fit going into the debate, and then threw him under the bus after exposing his mental decline. Now they get to select a nominee of their choosing, and it might not even be Harris! This is some seriously undemocratic maneuvering on their part, yet they'll keep fear mongering about Trump being the sole threat to democracy. Ranked choice voting and viable third parties are the solution, but the uniparty will never let it happen.
 
Last edited:

Frank Underwood

Telly Talk Champion
LV
3
 
Awards
9
Republicans are already threatening legal challenges to replacing Biden on the ticket. This is an extremely unusual election, and the road to the White House won't be easy.

Johnson: Replacing Biden on ticket would be 'wrong,' 'unlawful'​

Johnson reacts to talk about replacing Biden on the Democratic ticket.

As calls from some Democratic lawmakers for President Joe Biden to pass the torch have grown this week, House Speaker Mike Johnson suggested Sunday that such a move might lead to legal trouble.

Johnson, R-La., told "This Week" co-anchor Martha Raddatz that it would not be possible for some states to switch out Biden for another candidate ahead of the presidential election in November.

"So it would be wrong, and I think unlawful, in accordance to some of these states' rules for a handful of people to go in a back room and switch it out because they're, they don't like the candidate any longer. That's not how this is supposed to work. So I think they would run into some legal impediments in at least a few of these jurisdictions," he told Raddatz.

"I think there'll be a compelling case to be made that that shouldn't happen, and so I think they've got legal trouble. If that's their intention, and that's their plan. So we'll see how it plays out," he continued.

Election law expert Richard Hasen wrote that there is "no credence" to the notion that the Democratic Party could not legally replace Biden on the ticket, as he is not the nominee yet -- the nominating process generally takes place during the Democratic National Convention.

"Joe Biden is not the party's nominee now, and states generally point to the major party's nominee as the one whose name is on the ballot," he wrote in a piece earlier this month.

Raddatz asked Johnson on Sunday about how Republicans might approach the race differently if Vice President Kamala Harris were to replace Biden as the Democratic nominee.

"It doesn't matter who they put at the top of the ticket," Johnson said. "If Kamala is the nominee, so be it. She is the co-author and the co-owner of the policies of the Biden administration, and she owns all these policy failures herself."

In an ABC News/Washington Post/Ipsos poll published last week, Harris led Trump 49-46% among all adults if she replaced Biden as the Democratic nominee.

"I mean, it's no contest, and everybody knows that, and I think that's why we're in such a good position. I think this election should not be about personalities, but about policies," Johnson said.

Raddatz pushed back, noting that former President Donald Trump called Harris "crazy" and "nuts" at a rally in Grand Rapids, Michigan, on Saturday night.

"President Trump was attacking her personally, as you know, last night," Raddatz said. "He wasn't really talking about her policies."

Johnson responded that Democrats have lobbed the same kinds of verbal jabs against Trump.

"We could run the tape of the terrible things that Kamala Harris has said about Donald Trump, of course, and Biden, as well, and everybody in the Democrat leadership. I mean, we're accustomed to it now. It's their standard practice," Johnson said.

Source: https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/johnson-replacing-biden-ticket-wrong-unlawful/story?id=112129063
 
Last edited:

Frank Underwood

Telly Talk Champion
LV
3
 
Awards
9

America is paying the price for the monstrous Biden lie​


Joe Biden has bowed to the inevitable, and abandoned his attempt at re-election. It was a decision that should have been made four years ago in his first election campaign.

Even back then in 2020, there were clear concerns about the Democratic nominee’s age and health. But the Democratic party, with the active connivance of sections of the US media, worked overtime to cast any such concerns as nothing more than Republican slurs, and Mr Biden won the election.

Questions about his health, however, never quite went away. Clips of the President stumbling, misspeaking or appearing visibly confused continued to circulate for the duration of his term, in each case defused by helpful allies across the press, dismissed as “cheapfakes” or labelled “misinformation”.

When the change came, it came swiftly. When questions came one or two at a time from partisan sources, they could, with effort, be dismissed. When it became common knowledge that people of all persuasions could see that something was not quite right, they started to come thick and fast from all sides at once.

The shift in the public perception of Mr Biden’s mental state appears to have resulted in something close to absolute panic within the power structures of Democratic politics. It is possible to deny something that everyone knows, so long as you can maintain the idea that other people haven’t noticed, and punish those who speak out of line.

But this requires a coordination mechanism, and in this case, that appears to have been the idea that Mr Biden represented the best chance of maintaining Democratic control of the White House. The moment that wavered, the message discipline went with it, with a sudden burst of briefing about the President’s health released to Left-leaning organisations which had previously maintained the party line that there was “nothing to see here”.

The price for winning power with what looks, to the outside, like a deliberate strategy of deception is now being paid. The Democratic party has a little over 100 days to find a new nominee, install them, sort out their campaign financing, make their case to the American people – and seek forgiveness for the last four years.

After all, there is a considerable degree of explaining left to do. If Mr Biden was only “dependably engaged” for six hours of the day, what was the decision making process in the White House like outside of these hours? Who was guiding the President’s hand during the hours when he needed greater assistance to function? If the Commander in Chief loses his train of thought and is unable to “pick it up again”, who brings him round to a conclusion?

Meanwhile, the battle to secure the nomination is beginning. Mr Biden has endorsed his Vice President, Kamala Harris. With a great deal of money already raised for the Biden-Harris ticket, she enjoys a considerable financial advantage over any alternative names. However, there are legitimate questions about her popularity with the public and her work in the White House that could see other candidates make an attempt at unseating her.

It is not, to say the least, a good place for a party to be in so close to an election. Then again, it is also an entirely self-inflicted wound. Had Mr Biden prepared a succession plan, or been honest about his limitations at an earlier date, the path to a Democratic presidency would be far clearer.

Source: America is paying the price for the monstrous Biden lie (msn.com)
 

Emelee

Telly Talk Warrior
LV
6
 
Awards
16
Expected, but also crappy. There is no way in hell that The US will elect a woman for President. Only a few certain states would do that, but the swing states will go to Trump if a woman is the Dem candidate.
 

Seaviewer

Telly Talk Warrior
LV
9
 
Awards
20
I suppose it was inevitable but it's sad that it had to play out the way it has. It would have been far better if he had kept to his word that he would serve one term as a "transitional" president.
Comparisons are being made to Johnson in 1968. I think it's worth noting that the Republicans still won that year. Of course, it might have been different if Bobby Kennedy had been the nominee but that's one of the great unknowables.
 

Frank Underwood

Telly Talk Champion
LV
3
 
Awards
9
Expected, but also crappy. There is no way in hell that The US will elect a woman for President. Only a few certain states would do that, but the swing states will go to Trump if a woman is the Dem candidate.
There was a time when that was the case, but I'm not so sure it holds true today. Putting my personal feelings about Hillary Clinton aside, she did win the popular vote in 2016 by almost 3 million votes. Yes, the swing states went to Trump and allowed him to win the electoral college, but it wasn't because they refused to vote for a woman. Clinton had ignored the swing states and wouldn't campaign there, which left a lane open for Trump to position himself as the working class's champion. This disparity in approaches was emphasized again when Senate Majority leader Chuck Schumer went on TV and said the Dems would pick up two moderate Republicans for every blue-collar Dem they lost.

Of course, 2020 was completely different because of the pandemic. The country had also grown Trump weary. By voting for Biden, they also voted for the first woman of color Vice President. Biden may have been at the top of the ticket, but they apparently found Harris suitable to serve out the remainder of Biden's term should he be unable to do so. The problem Harris faces now is people have had 3 and a half years to see her in "action," and it's clear that there's not much substance to her. She also carries the baggage of the Biden Administration's policies. Economic conditions for the lower classes have continued to decline. Meanwhile, they're funding a war in Ukraine and a genocide in Gaza.

The bottom line is I believe a woman can become president, preferably if she has solid policy positions and is a competent speaker. Unfortunately, that's not Kamala Harris.
 
Last edited:

Frank Underwood

Telly Talk Champion
LV
3
 
Awards
9
I suppose it was inevitable but it's sad that it had to play out the way it has. It would have been far better if he had kept to his word that he would serve one term as a "transitional" president.
Comparisons are being made to Johnson in 1968. I think it's worth noting that the Republicans still won that year. Of course, it might have been different if Bobby Kennedy had been the nominee but that's one of the great unknowables.
As much as I despise Biden, I blame the Democratic establishment even more. The fact that he was seen as "transitional" in the first place is insane. When selecting a nominee, people generally consider the likelihood of the candidate being able to serve a full two terms. The Dems knew that Biden's health was declining, but they had a backup plan. That's why they refused to let the 2020 primaries play out organically once Bernie Sanders emerged as the front runner. The "Democratic" Party has consistently proven how undemocratic it truly is over the last 8 years. Biden was clearly the contingency to get Harris in the White House all along, but they never expected her to falter this much.
 

Rove

Telly Talk Warrior
LV
0
 
Awards
5
yet they'll keep fear mongering about Trump being the sole threat to democracy
I keep hearing this argument statement from those who despise Trump. Just once I'd love to respond with, "Please explain." How exactly is Trump a threat to democracy? If he wins will he sign a document making him supreme leader...until eternity?

Just askin'.
 
Last edited:

Frank Underwood

Telly Talk Champion
LV
3
 
Awards
9
I keep hearing this argument statement from who despise Trump. Just once I'd love to respond with, "Please explain." How exactly is Trump a threat to democracy? If he wins will he sign a document making him supreme leader...until eternity?

Just askin'.
I think they were originally referring to Trump's refusal to accept the 2020 election results. Apparently, the Democrats want us to forget what Russia-gate was all about.

Now they're claiming that Trump will become a dictator and refuse to leave office. Oddly enough, they can't explain why Trump didn't do that during his first term.
 
Last edited:

Angela Channing

Telly Talk Veteran
LV
19
 
Awards
52
"Please explain." How exactly is Trump a threat to democracy
What he has done in the past and what he proposes to do in the future.

Trump has propagated the great lie that he didn't win the 2020 Presidential election, he demanded VP Pence not to ratify the democratic decision of US voters and he incited his supporters to carry out an insurrection at Capital Hill. Trump has said if he wins the election in November he will act like a dictator on day one of his administration and his advisors are behind Project 25 which is a terrifying right-wing power grab and could be implemented if Trump is re-elected. That's just for starters.
 

Karin

Moderator
Staff Member
LV
1
 
Awards
10
I think Biden stepping down is a good thing. At least now the Democratic party will offer voters another option than older american man.
So will the American people be ready to vote for a woman?

I really doubt that. But I hope they will prove me wrong!
 

KayLloyd

Telly Talk Addict
LV
0
 
Awards
5
Expected, but also crappy. There is no way in hell that The US will elect a woman for President. Only a few certain states would do that, but the swing states will go to Trump if a woman is the Dem candidate.
Harris was complicit in the cover-up of Biden's deteriorating condition, it has nothing to do with her being a woman.
 

Sarah Danner

Telly Talk Active Member
LV
0
 
Awards
5
Too bad he didn't have this come-to-Jesus before all those primary votes were wasted.
The convention ought to be enchanting viewing for the first time in a long time.
 

KayLloyd

Telly Talk Addict
LV
0
 
Awards
5
I think Biden stepping down is a good thing. At least now the Democratic party will offer voters another option than older american man.
So will the American people be ready to vote for a woman?

I really doubt that. But I hope they will prove me wr

I think Biden stepping down is a good thing. At least now the Democratic party will offer voters another option than older american man.
So will the American people be ready to vote for a woman?

I really doubt that. But I hope they will prove me wrong!
This bait and switch humiliation of Biden has been their plan all along, and it's very sad and disconcerting. I don't see it as a good thing at all.
 

Frank Underwood

Telly Talk Champion
LV
3
 
Awards
9
I've said many times before that I'm not a fan of Trump. I've never voted for him before, and I don't plan on voting for him now.

That said, it frustrates me when people take things out of context in order to make Trump seem even worse than he actually is. The media has run with "Trump will be a dictator on day one" for months now, but they're being intentionally misleading. The quote comes from an interview Trump did with Sean Hannity. "I love this guy," Trump said, referring to Hannity. "He says, 'You’re not going to be a dictator, are you?' I said: 'No, no, no. Other than day one.' We’re closing the border, and we’re drilling, drilling, drilling. After that, I’m not a dictator." By being a "dictator," Trump's referring to issuing executive orders. This is something presidents from both parties regularly do. Biden has issued 140 so far.

Another thing Trump's accused of is starting an insurrection. Although he encouraged his supporters to march to the capitol and used provocative language, he also told them to be peaceful. Of course, if Trump's guilty of "the great lie" for saying the 2020 election was stolen, I guess that makes Russia-gate "the great deception." The Dems spent four years trying to convince people that Trump was an illegitimate president installed by Putin. Of course, this was after they meddled in two consecutive primaries to ensure Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden were the Democratic Party's nominees in 2016 and 2020 respectively. In 2024, they refused to have a competitive primary or hold debates.

Meanwhile, they intentionally covered up Biden's deteriorating cognitive state while assuring the public that he was capable of serving for four more years. They pretended he was cogent just long enough for him to win the primary. Once that was over, they conveniently scheduled the earliest presidential debate in history. For reference, the debate occurred 131 days before the election. Prior to that, the earliest presidential debate occurred a mere 44 days before the election in 1980! They knew Biden was in no shape to run, but they had to wait until the right moment to sabotage him. Now Harris will likely become the party's nominee like the Dems wanted in 2020. How democratic of them.

As for project 25, Trump claims to know nothing about it. He also called some of the proposals "absolutely ridiculous and abysmal." I tend to think he's lying myself since many of his former advisors are behind it. But as people are rightly concerned about the possible implementation of far-right policies, keep in mind the Dems refused to codify Roe v. Wade. They chose instead to use it as a campaign promise indefinitely. Same goes for raising the minimum wage. The Dems also escalated tensions with Russia by threatening NATO expansion and they spent the last 3 years funding a proxy war in Ukraine. At least Trump claims he'll put an end to it, although he plans on funding the genocide in Gaza just like Biden. Trump also got flak for saying we should steal the oil of countries we go to war with, but Biden advisor Neera Tanden said the same thing in a leaked email.

I'm not sure what it'll take to convince people that the Dems are just as undemocratic as Trump. We're getting screwed either way, but people still like to pick their poison.
 
Last edited:
Top