Harris Staffers Blaming Biden Admin For Not Helping Her Campaign

Frank Underwood

Telly Talk Champion
LV
3
 
Awards
9
Could there be trouble in paradise? The outcome of this election is going to suck no matter who wins, so might as well enjoy the drama in the mean time.

Harris staffers blaming Biden admin for not helping her campaign: ‘They’re too much in their feelings’​


Vice President Kamala Harris staffers are starting to blame the Biden administration for not doing enough to help her presidential campaign, according to a new report – as the Democrat sinks in the polls with less than a month before the Nov. 5 election.

Despite the veneer of unity that Harris and President Biden have displayed after Biden dropped out of the race, some of their staffers have reportedly been butting heads behind the scenes.

Privately, several members of Harris’ team have feuded with Biden’s White House staff, feeling that they aren’t adequately prioritizing her election bid while some within the president’s orbit still feel raw over his ouster.

“The White House is lacking someone in the room thinking first and foremost about how things would affect the campaign,” a source involved in the Harris-Walz campaign told Axios.

As the Harris-Walz campaign grapples with a very close election, some within Harris’ orbit have felt that the White House hasn’t been calibrating the president’s schedule and messaging in the way that she needs, Axios reported, citing 10 sources familiar.

“They’re too much in their feelings,” a Harris ally told the outlet of the Biden White House.

Just this month, Biden, 81, shocked reporters by giving his first-ever press conference in the White House briefing room as president, which some in Harris’ world felt sucked the media oxygen away from her Flint, Michigan rally.

Last week, Harris, 59, feuded with Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) after reports revealed that his team turned down an overture to hold a call with her in the aftermath of Hurricane Helene late last month.

Biden then praised DeSantis’ job getting the Sunshine State ready for Hurricane Milton. He also held a call with DeSantis. All of this gave fodder to conservative critics that vexed the Harris campaign.

When asked about the Axios report, White House senior deputy press secretary Andrew Bates underscored to The Post that Biden endorsed Harris “immediately after leaving the race,” alluding to calls the president rejected for a mini primary to replace him.

“We have made significant changes to guarantee the Vice President’s team has all of the support and resources that they need,” Bates argued, crediting the White House for “successfully executing an unprecedented transition to a new candidate.”

Despite a subset of White House staffers being alienated by the Democratic revolt that led to Biden bowing out of the race, some have opted to jump ship onto Harris’ campaign.

A White House official familiar with the dynamic told The Post that Biden’s team recognizes “that the VP and her team need the independence to run the campaign on their terms and our goal is to provide support when helpful.”

That official contended that the Harris-Biden administration is doing what it can “within the rules” to ensure coordination between the Office of the Vice Presidency (OVP), the White House and the Harris-Walz campaign.

Several steps the White House has taken for coordination, include having vice presidential staffers sit on strategic meetings and working to accommodate Harris’ travel schedule, according to that official.

“There are legal restrictions affecting details from the White House to the Office of the Vice President, so senior White House aides worked hard to find effective alternatives,” the official added.

But past efforts by some hardcore Biden loyalists to fend off the mutiny against him over the summer loom large for allies of Harris.

Famously amid that revolt against Biden, deputy campaign manager Rob Flaherty strongly insinuated that alternatives to him were less likely to defeat former President Donald Trump.

“At the end of the day, we’d switch to candidates who would, according to polls, be less likely to win than Joe Biden — the only person ever to defeat Donald Trump,” Flaherty wrote at the time.

To date, Harris has staunchly resisted pressure from top party strategists who have implored her to publicly draw a contrast with the policies of unpopular Biden.

“There is not a thing that comes to mind,” Harris told ABC News’ “The View” last week when asked if she would’ve done something differently during her boss’ presidency.

“And I’ve been part of most of the decisions that have had impact,” she went on, before later clarifying that one difference she will have with Biden is that she intends to have a Republican in the Cabinet.

Those comments gave the Trump-Vance campaign ammunition given Biden’s lackluster approval ratings.

Conversely, Biden has been emphatic about his praise of Harris, declaring during the Democratic National Convention in August that choosing her as his veep was “the best decision I made my whole career.”

Notably after delivering a headline speech on the first night of the convention, Biden jetted off for a lengthy getaway that spanned some two weeks.

Ultimately, once Harris ascended to the top of the ticket, her standing against Trump grew more competitive than Biden’s poll numbers had been.

Harris staffers blaming Biden admin for not helping campaign (nypost.com)
 

KayLloyd

Telly Talk Addict
LV
0
 
Awards
5
Could there be trouble in paradise? The outcome of this election is going to suck no matter who wins, so might as well enjoy the drama in the mean time.

Harris staffers blaming Biden admin for not helping her campaign: ‘They’re too much in their feelings’​


Vice President Kamala Harris staffers are starting to blame the Biden administration for not doing enough to help her presidential campaign, according to a new report – as the Democrat sinks in the polls with less than a month before the Nov. 5 election.

Despite the veneer of unity that Harris and President Biden have displayed after Biden dropped out of the race, some of their staffers have reportedly been butting heads behind the scenes.

Privately, several members of Harris’ team have feuded with Biden’s White House staff, feeling that they aren’t adequately prioritizing her election bid while some within the president’s orbit still feel raw over his ouster.

“The White House is lacking someone in the room thinking first and foremost about how things would affect the campaign,” a source involved in the Harris-Walz campaign told Axios.

As the Harris-Walz campaign grapples with a very close election, some within Harris’ orbit have felt that the White House hasn’t been calibrating the president’s schedule and messaging in the way that she needs, Axios reported, citing 10 sources familiar.

“They’re too much in their feelings,” a Harris ally told the outlet of the Biden White House.

Just this month, Biden, 81, shocked reporters by giving his first-ever press conference in the White House briefing room as president, which some in Harris’ world felt sucked the media oxygen away from her Flint, Michigan rally.

Last week, Harris, 59, feuded with Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) after reports revealed that his team turned down an overture to hold a call with her in the aftermath of Hurricane Helene late last month.

Biden then praised DeSantis’ job getting the Sunshine State ready for Hurricane Milton. He also held a call with DeSantis. All of this gave fodder to conservative critics that vexed the Harris campaign.

When asked about the Axios report, White House senior deputy press secretary Andrew Bates underscored to The Post that Biden endorsed Harris “immediately after leaving the race,” alluding to calls the president rejected for a mini primary to replace him.

“We have made significant changes to guarantee the Vice President’s team has all of the support and resources that they need,” Bates argued, crediting the White House for “successfully executing an unprecedented transition to a new candidate.”

Despite a subset of White House staffers being alienated by the Democratic revolt that led to Biden bowing out of the race, some have opted to jump ship onto Harris’ campaign.

A White House official familiar with the dynamic told The Post that Biden’s team recognizes “that the VP and her team need the independence to run the campaign on their terms and our goal is to provide support when helpful.”

That official contended that the Harris-Biden administration is doing what it can “within the rules” to ensure coordination between the Office of the Vice Presidency (OVP), the White House and the Harris-Walz campaign.

Several steps the White House has taken for coordination, include having vice presidential staffers sit on strategic meetings and working to accommodate Harris’ travel schedule, according to that official.

“There are legal restrictions affecting details from the White House to the Office of the Vice President, so senior White House aides worked hard to find effective alternatives,” the official added.

But past efforts by some hardcore Biden loyalists to fend off the mutiny against him over the summer loom large for allies of Harris.

Famously amid that revolt against Biden, deputy campaign manager Rob Flaherty strongly insinuated that alternatives to him were less likely to defeat former President Donald Trump.

“At the end of the day, we’d switch to candidates who would, according to polls, be less likely to win than Joe Biden — the only person ever to defeat Donald Trump,” Flaherty wrote at the time.

To date, Harris has staunchly resisted pressure from top party strategists who have implored her to publicly draw a contrast with the policies of unpopular Biden.

“There is not a thing that comes to mind,” Harris told ABC News’ “The View” last week when asked if she would’ve done something differently during her boss’ presidency.

“And I’ve been part of most of the decisions that have had impact,” she went on, before later clarifying that one difference she will have with Biden is that she intends to have a Republican in the Cabinet.

Those comments gave the Trump-Vance campaign ammunition given Biden’s lackluster approval ratings.

Conversely, Biden has been emphatic about his praise of Harris, declaring during the Democratic National Convention in August that choosing her as his veep was “the best decision I made my whole career.”

Notably after delivering a headline speech on the first night of the convention, Biden jetted off for a lengthy getaway that spanned some two weeks.

Ultimately, once Harris ascended to the top of the ticket, her standing against Trump grew more competitive than Biden’s poll numbers had been.

Harris staffers blaming Biden admin for not helping campaign (nypost.com)
What I find very telling is Obama chastising African American men, that was a calculated move that he knew wasn't going to play well for Harris, and I think that he is deliberately sabotaging Harris so that she looses the election and and clears the way for either Michelle or him to run in 2028.
 
Last edited:

DallasFanForever

Telly Talk Supreme
LV
5
 
Awards
17
and clears the way for either Michelle or him to run in 2028.
Michelle must really not want any part of it because I have a hard time believing she wouldn’t have run by now if she really wanted to.

As for Barack though, I don’t think he can ever run again, can he? I thought two full served terms was the max allowed?
 

Frank Underwood

Telly Talk Champion
LV
3
 
Awards
9
As for Barack though, I don’t think he can ever run again, can he? I thought two full served terms was the max allowed?
I'm not sure where that's coming from either. The 22nd Amendment doesn't allow a president to serve more than two terms. It would be an arduous process to change that.

There's also been speculation that Trump will stay in office indefinitely if he's elected again, but I don't see that happening for the same reason.

Obama clearly loves the spotlight, hence why he's campaigning for Harris. Michelle may or may not run someday, but she's his only hope of getting back in the White House.
 

DallasFanForever

Telly Talk Supreme
LV
5
 
Awards
17
I'm not sure where that's coming from either. The 22nd Amendment doesn't allow a president to serve more than two terms. It would be an arduous process to change that.
That’s what I thought, although I’ve always had mixed feelings on the term limitation amendment myself. I understand why it was passed but to me if someone has a high approval rating and the voters feel that strongly about having them for a third term then I think they should have that option. Personally I would have no issue with that if that’s what the majority of the country wanted.


There's also been speculation that Trump will stay in office indefinitely if he's elected again, but I don't see that happening for the same reason.
I don’t know where people get the idea from that someone could stay in indefinitely because obviously that’s not the way it works. Technically he can only serve one more four year term if elected.
 

Frank Underwood

Telly Talk Champion
LV
3
 
Awards
9
What I find very telling is Obama chastising African American men, that was a calculated move that he knew wasn't going to play well for Harris, and I think that he is deliberately sabotaging Harris so that she looses the election and and clears the way for either Michelle or him to run in 2028.
I think it was poor strategy on his part. The Dems have a terrible habit of chastising men whenever a woman runs for president. They'd rather do that than focus on policies.

The Dems have always been terrible at voter outreach. They never miss an opportunity to be smug and condescending, rather than engaging and persuasive.
 
Last edited:

Frank Underwood

Telly Talk Champion
LV
3
 
Awards
9
I've got a terrible feeling that it's going to be 2016 all over again.
Harris is using Hillary Clinton's failed playbook from 2016, which certainly doesn't help.

An anti-war candidate that ran on being a champion of the poor and working class would likely be trouncing Trump right now. Instead, the Dems chose a nominee endorsed by Dick and Liz Cheney. Even CNN's Jake Tapper questioned why Harris is campaigning with Liz Cheney and not Bernie Sanders. Sadly, the answer is obvious.

The in-fighting between the Biden and Harris camps also goes to show that the coup against Biden wasn't as smooth as we were originally led to believe.
 
Last edited:

KayLloyd

Telly Talk Addict
LV
0
 
Awards
5
Harris is using Hillary Clinton's failed playbook from 2016, which certainly doesn't help.

An anti-war candidate that ran on being a champion of the poor and working class would likely be trouncing Trump right now. Instead, the Dems chose a nominee endorsed by Dick and Liz Cheney. Even CNN's Jake Tapper questioned why Harris is campaigning with Liz Cheney and not Bernie Sanders. Sadly, the answer is obvious.

The in-fighting between the Biden and Harris camps also goes to show that the coup against Biden wasn't as smooth as we were originally led to believe.
Indeed, and letting Obama continue to openly sabotage her shows just how bad Harris's decision making is and how unfit she is to be President. It's so pathetic that it's laughable, Obama says that Trump wants unchecked power while he's the one serving his third term behind the scenes.
 
Last edited:

Snarky Oracle!

Telly Talk Supreme
LV
8
 
Awards
21
Something's happening...

There are subtle signs that the mainstream media is suddenly turning on Harris (and certain billionaires expecting to endorse her refusing to at the last minute). Even Democratic pundits are, almost overnight, acknowledging and criticizing her trademark hollow word-salads.

This has to be strategic.

What gives?? They probably are realizing Trump may very well win on November 5 and they're afraid of his vindictive targeting of them (just as what has been done to him --- and, no, I've never voted for Trump); and there are rumblings that the Democrats realize that a Kamala Harris win, and subsequent presidency, could damage their party for years into the future.

Obama is actively campaigning for her despite -- or because -- he didn't want her for the nominee because he solidly believed she couldn't win.

BTW: I watched the entire 3-hour Trump interview with Joe Rogan today, and it's pretty tough to get through; Trump was just doing his usual talking-over-himself routine (reminiscent of Fred Armisen's SNL character who can't finish a brief thought because he's endlessly distracted by his next one -- which I've heard can be solved by a little extra selenium, but that hasn't worked for me). Rogan says Kamala has been invited too, but one suspects her handlers are unlikely to allow it as they've been keeping her away from most extended interview scenarios for obvious reasons -- her "joy" would just be too lustrous.

D1KPKpiXcAAEg9T.jpg
 

KayLloyd

Telly Talk Addict
LV
0
 
Awards
5
Something's happening...

There are subtle signs that the mainstream media is suddenly turning on Harris (and certain billionaires expecting to endorse her refusing to at the last minute). Even Democratic pundits are, almost overnight, acknowledging and criticizing her trademark hollow word-salads.

This has to be strategic.

What gives?? They probably are realizing Trump may very well win on November 5 and they're afraid of his vindictive targeting of them (just as what has been done to him --- and, no, I've never voted for Trump); and there are rumblings that the Democrats realize that a Kamala Harris win, and subsequent presidency, could damage their party for years into the future.

Obama is actively campaigning for her despite -- or because -- he didn't want her for the nominee because he solidly believed she couldn't win.

BTW: I watched the entire 3-hour Trump interview with Joe Rogan today, and it's pretty tough to get through; Trump was just doing his usual talking-over-himself routine (reminiscent of Fred Armisen's SNL character who can't finish a brief thought because he's endlessly distracted by his next one -- which I've heard can be solved by a little extra selenium, but that hasn't worked for me). Rogan says Kamala has been invited too, but one suspects her handlers are unlikely to allow it as they've been keeping her away from most extended interview scenarios for obvious reasons -- her "joy" would just be too lustrous.

D1KPKpiXcAAEg9T.jpg
Something is definitely up, now Michelle is in on the sabotage act.
 

Frank Underwood

Telly Talk Champion
LV
3
 
Awards
9
Something's happening...

There are subtle signs that the mainstream media is suddenly turning on Harris (and certain billionaires expecting to endorse her refusing to at the last minute). Even Democratic pundits are, almost overnight, acknowledging and criticizing her trademark hollow word-salads.

This has to be strategic.
Yes, it's quite obvious why Harris avoided the media for so long. She's the queen of deflection, gaslighting, and non sequiturs.

Like many of her supporters, Harris pivots to Trump to deflect from her own flaws. Of course, you don't have to be a Trump supporter to recognize that Harris is a terrible candidate in her own right. Dem strategists and media figures seem to realize this (for the most part,) but there will always be a few who blame it on sexism. I honestly believe that is why the Dems wanted their nominee to be a woman of color. If Harris bombs, they can say it's because most Americans are racist and sexist. It's a great way to absolve a candidate of running a substance-free campaign focused on empty platitudes like "joy."

Harris Flounders in Final Media Sprint: 'Word Salads Aren't Very Tasty'​


Vice President Kamala Harris was slammed for avoiding media appearances when she launched her nascent presidential campaign less than four months before the election. Now that she's embraced the media circuit, the Democratic nominee is being criticized — including from those within her own party — for not being quicker or sharper on her feet when she's given opportunities to answer direct questions.

Her campaign initially worked to address concerns about its media strategy by scheduling a series of interviews, on both cable news and with outlets outside the mainstream, aimed at reaching undecided and swing-state voters.

But things took a turn for Harris when she went on ABC's The View earlier this month and immediately caught blowback for saying she couldn't think of anything she would have done differently than President Joe Biden in the last four years.

"There is not a thing that comes to mind," Harris told co-host Sunny Hostin when Hostin asked her about specific things she would have changed.

Former President Donald Trump's campaign immediately seized on the comment as being indicative of Trump's frequent assertion that Harris' candidacy — and a potential Harris presidency — would only be a continuation of Biden's policies.

Harris, for her part, has since said she'd bring a "new generation of leadership" to the White House, though the damage from The View was done. Her "not a thing" line now appears in Trump's closing ad campaign, along with another spot centered around her policies on transgender issues.

"She is Biden," Trump said during his first and only presidential debate with Harris in September. "She's trying to get away from Biden. I don't know the gentleman, she says. She is Biden."

On Wednesday, Harris again had a less-than-stellar showing during a CNN town hall, which the network's own pundits and political strategists pointed out.

Among the harshest critics was David Axelrod, a longtime Democratic operative who was Barack Obama's chief strategist during his 2008 and 2012 campaigns.

"The things that would concern me is when she doesn't want to answer a question, her habit is to kind of go to word salad city," Axelrod said Wednesday after the town hall, using Republicans' oft-repeated jab against her.

Axelrod also criticized Harris for being evasive when asked direct questions on foreign policy, immigration, and border security.

"She would acknowledge no concerns about any of the administration's policies," he said. "And that's a mistake. Sometimes you have to concede things, and she didn't concede much."

Glen Bolger, a veteran Republican strategist and the co-founder of Public Opinion Strategies, didn't mince words on what he thinks of Harris' media strategy.

"She can't think on her feet, doesn't know what she stands for, and has no original policy ideas," he told Newsweek. "Her advisers are smart to keep her from the press. Word salads aren't very tasty."

Maria Cardona, a veteran Democratic strategist, struck a different tone, saying it was important to look at Harris' campaign in context.

"The reality is that she had a very constricted timeframe from which to build a campaign from scratch, get her national and state staff in place, reach out to DNC delegates to get their support, get nominated, pick a vice president, put together a flawless convention," introduce herself to voters, and come up with a coherent messaging strategy, Cardona told Newsweek.

Harris has "had to do the impossible, layered with historic sexism and misogyny ... that demand that she be flawless," Cardona added.

A series of recent national polls, meanwhile, have shown Trump and Harris in a dead heat in the final stretch before Election Day. Early voting is also kicking off across the country, and both candidates have focused almost all their energy on rallying voters in key swing states like Pennsylvania, Georgia, Arizona, and Nevada (notwithstanding Friday's dual visits to Texas).

Former New Jersey Governor Chris Christie weighed in on the state of play during an appearance on The View Friday, indicating that the last week or so may have been pivotal for Harris' campaign.

"Ten days ago, I would have said she's going to win," Christie, a vocal anti-Trump Republican, told the hosts. "But she's had a bad ten days."

But Cardona, the Democratic strategist, thinks Harris' strategy has been effective so far.

"The energy and enthusiasm out there for her is immeasurable, and it certainly is not getting picked up in the polls," she told Newsweek.

"In an ideal world, she would have started talking to the media earlier, and she could've put together a campaign with a lot more time," Cardona said. "But that ideal world was never going to exist."

Source: https://www.newsweek.com/kamala-harris-media-polls-trump-election-1975179
 
Last edited:

Frank Underwood

Telly Talk Champion
LV
3
 
Awards
9
Something is definitely up, now Michelle is in on the sabotage act.
Yes, she's chastising men just like Barack did. She said women will be "collateral damage" of men who don't vote for Harris. She's obviously referring to a woman's right to choose, which her husband promised to codify and never did. If Michelle wants to chastise anybody, she should start with her husband.

Michelle Obama makes plea to male voters at Michigan rally
 
Last edited:

Frank Underwood

Telly Talk Champion
LV
3
 
Awards
9
Harris was asked by Anderson Cooper about potentially losing votes over her continued support for Israel's genocide in Gaza. Harris pretended to sympathize with people who have "strong feelings" about the slaughter of Palestinians. She then proceeded to say that people are also concerned about the cost of groceries, fascism, and democracy. While it's true that Americans also care about those issues, it's interesting that those are the three things she pivoted to. Under the Biden Administration, the cost of groceries has increased significantly. Harris, of course, is the VP in that administration.

As for fascism, the Biden Administration is pro-censorship and is funding the war in Ukraine and the genocide in Gaza.

Lastly, there's democracy. DNC insiders selected Harris to be their nominee after lying about Biden's mental acuity for years. They waited until after their intentionally non-competitive primary to force Biden to drop out. This ensured that the party would get to select the nominee instead of the voters. It's absurd that people claim Trump is the sole threat to democracy, while pretending that Harris became the Democratic Party's nominee democratically.

Kamala Gives DESPICABLE Answer to Israel Question at CNN Town Hall
 
Last edited:

Seaviewer

Telly Talk Warrior
LV
9
 
Awards
20
I don't know why Harris is being singled out over so-called Word Salads. That's the way most politicians speak. They avoid being too specific and launch into a prepared speech on what they wanted to be asked instead of answering the actual question. It's annoying but Harris doesn't have it on her own.

 

Frank Underwood

Telly Talk Champion
LV
3
 
Awards
9
I don't know why Harris is being singled out over so-called Word Salads. That's the way most politicians speak. They avoid being too specific and launch into a prepared speech on what they wanted to be asked instead of answering the actual question. It's annoying but Harris doesn't have it on her own.

Harris is accused of giving word salad speeches because she struggles to form a coherent thought. It has nothing to do with avoiding specifics or relying on a prepared speech (although she does that too.) Take President Obama, for example. He was a neoliberal charlatan just like Harris, but he knew how to craft an articulate, coherent narrative to win over people. In contrast, Harris often back pedals, rambles, and meanders when trying to answer a question.

The Bernie Sanders video you posted also reinforces my point. Sanders has always articulated his thoughts well, although I don't buy what he's selling here. Harris plans to continue sending billions to Israel, and Sanders knows she doesn't have a plan to deescalate the situation. That's why I think Sanders is being both disingenuous and flippant. By predicting that Trump will make the situation worse if he gets in office, Sanders is effectively undermining the damage that the Biden Administration has already caused for a solid year. The need for humanitarian aid would be much less if the US wasn't funding Israel's genocide in Gaza, which Sanders glosses over. Dems want credit for being "the good guys," despite their role in the devastation and destruction.

As for abortion rights, Obama betrayed his promise to codify them (which he had the ability to do in 2009.) Funny how Dems never mention that.

Another issue that Sanders mentioned is climate change. Harris infamously flip-flopped on fracking, which she now proudly supports.

Lastly, Sanders brought up the minimum wage. He must want us to forget that Biden promised to raise it when he took office.

As per usual, Sanders expects voters to hold Trump accountable for the lies and failures of Dems. Sanders is right that Trump won't solve the pressing issues of our time, but what good does voting Democrat do if they won't fight to solve them either? That's why I cast my vote for Jill Stein. Sanders accused Trump's rally speakers of attacking Harris for being "a woman of color." While that may be true, I oppose her and Trump for what they stand for.
 
Last edited:

Frank Underwood

Telly Talk Champion
LV
3
 
Awards
9
Speaking of Bernie Sanders, he had this to say when asked why struggling Americans would ever vote for Trump:

"I'll tell you exactly why. Because they are looking at the government. They're looking at the Democratic Party and saying, 'I can't afford healthcare. My kid can't afford to go to college. Everything being equal, my daughter is going to have a lower standard of living than I do. What are you doing for me? You're not doing really much. Trump is coming along. He is an atypical politician. He wants to get rid of all of that stuff. Why not? Maybe I think he's a little crazy. Maybe I don't agree with him on this, but he's not part of the old fashioned political establishment.' So that has an appeal.

Bottom line here is the way to beat Trump is to say, yeah, you want change, we're going to give you change. But it's not based on racism. It's not based on xenophobia. It's a change that says we're going to create an economy for you, not just for billionaires."

Bernie is certainly correct here, but he fails to mention that the Dems will never actually do that. That's why they worked harder to defeat Sanders than they did to defeat Trump. In 2016, Sanders himself said that the Dems would rather go down with the Titanic, so long as they have first class seats. He clearly knows how corrupt they are, yet he continues to shill for them. Even so, Harris still spits in his eye and does campaign events with Liz Cheney.

Harris clearly prefers the endorsement of vile neocons like the Cheneys. Considering her plans for Gaza and Ukraine, she'll be a war monger like them too.

 
Last edited:

KayLloyd

Telly Talk Addict
LV
0
 
Awards
5
Yes, she's chastising men just like Barack did. She said women will be "collateral damage" of men who don't vote for Harris. She's obviously referring to a woman's right to choose, which her husband promised to codify and never did. If Michelle wants to chastise anybody, she should start with her husband.

Michelle Obama makes plea to male voters at Michigan rally
Now Julia Roberts has made a fool of herself by narrating that ridiculous and offensive ad that women are too stupid to know that we can vote for anyone that we damn well please, Biden has called us garbage, and Mark Cuban has said that we're not strong and intelligent. We're all supposed to all good little clueless Handmaiden one issue robots who tow the Roe the vote for Kammie line. You can't make this stuff up.
 
Last edited:

Snarky Oracle!

Telly Talk Supreme
LV
8
 
Awards
21
Now Julia Roberts has made a fool of herself by narrating that ridiculous and offensive ad that women are too stupid to know that we can vote for anyone that we damn well please, Biden has called us garbage, and Mark Cuban has said that we're not strong and intelligent. We're all supposed to all good little clueless Handmaiden one issue robots who tow the Roe the vote for Kammie line. You can't make this stuff up.

Michelle Obama, who I once thought I liked, said the other day in a speech that men need to put aside their "rage" and do right by their women in their voting choices. She made a big point of it.

But a couple of years ago, Michelle said, "Sometimes we women are too nice to our men."
 
Last edited:
Top