Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Frank Underwood" data-source="post: 30997" data-attributes="member: 35">Also, it&#039;s worth keeping in mind that many Democrats believed the FBI&#039;s investigation of Hillary was simply an excuse to hurt her in the election.&nbsp; However, those same Democrats aren&#039;t questioning the CIA&#039;s accusation that Russia is behind the hacked emails.&nbsp; Republicans are just the opposite.&nbsp; They believe every investigation of Hillary should result in a conviction, but believe blaming Russia for the hacked emails is just &quot;partisan politics.&quot;&nbsp; This is why many people have lost faith in their government, and take everything said with a grain of salt.&nbsp; Everything is partisan now. Another issue worth noting is how this is being spun in the press.&nbsp; The Democrats keep saying that the Russians &quot;hacked the election,&quot; which is ridiculously misleading.&nbsp; That makes it sound like they tampered with the votes, when what they really did was release emails from the DNC and John Podesta to Wikileaks.&nbsp; That&#039;s hardly the same thing as hacking the election results.&nbsp; Democrats are now resorting to the kind of trickery that Republicans are known for.As for the information released, I believe it should have been available to the public anyway.&nbsp; Because of the emails, we learned that the DNC chose to bury the debates and suggested attacking Bernie over his religion.&nbsp; Donna Brazile was caught leaking debate questions to Hillary, and Hillary herself admitted to having both a public and private stance on the issues.&nbsp; These sort of unethical shenanigans should not be allowed to go on behind closed doors.&nbsp; We deserve transparency when it comes to how our political parties conduct themselves.&nbsp; Thanks to the information released, Debbie Wasserman Shcultz lost her chair position with the DNC, and Donna Brazile was ousted from CNN. Lastly, if a major political party&#039;s emails are this vulnerable to attacks, their Internet security is clearly not up to par.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Frank Underwood, post: 30997, member: 35"] Also, it's worth keeping in mind that many Democrats believed the FBI's investigation of Hillary was simply an excuse to hurt her in the election. However, those same Democrats aren't questioning the CIA's accusation that Russia is behind the hacked emails. Republicans are just the opposite. They believe every investigation of Hillary should result in a conviction, but believe blaming Russia for the hacked emails is just "partisan politics." This is why many people have lost faith in their government, and take everything said with a grain of salt. Everything is partisan now. Another issue worth noting is how this is being spun in the press. The Democrats keep saying that the Russians "hacked the election," which is ridiculously misleading. That makes it sound like they tampered with the votes, when what they really did was release emails from the DNC and John Podesta to Wikileaks. That's hardly the same thing as hacking the election results. Democrats are now resorting to the kind of trickery that Republicans are known for. As for the information released, I believe it should have been available to the public anyway. Because of the emails, we learned that the DNC chose to bury the debates and suggested attacking Bernie over his religion. Donna Brazile was caught leaking debate questions to Hillary, and Hillary herself admitted to having both a public and private stance on the issues. These sort of unethical shenanigans should not be allowed to go on behind closed doors. We deserve transparency when it comes to how our political parties conduct themselves. Thanks to the information released, Debbie Wasserman Shcultz lost her chair position with the DNC, and Donna Brazile was ousted from CNN. Lastly, if a major political party's emails are this vulnerable to attacks, their Internet security is clearly not up to par. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Who played Sue Ellen in Dallas?