Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Snarky Oracle!" data-source="post: 81712" data-attributes="member: 57984">Yes, and the women in particular don&#039;t know what else to say. They&#039;ve been culturally bred to think any opposition and any lack of praise is automatically &quot;misogyny.&quot;They really don&#039;t know how else to process it.When Bill Clinton was slaughtered unreasonably in the &#039;90s and beyond, he wasn&#039;t in a position to claim sexism (and in fact was accused of it just because he like a little side snatch). And when Obama was lacerated insanely for 8 years, even though he could have screamed &quot;racism&quot; (and some did) he instead chose to say, &quot;Look, I was black before I was elected...&quot;But not a woman and not Hillary.Has anyone witnessed in their real lives how women respond to any criticism, as opposed to how men respond to it? Be that criticism accurate or false?Women, of course, will respond &quot;but all we get is criticism!&quot; which is really not true at all, but they genuinely don&#039;t realize the falseness of that argument. It&#039;s so ingrained.If you don&#039;t get what you want, or if someone insults you, then it&#039;s automatically &quot;sexism&quot; and &quot;misogyny&quot; and the &quot;patriarchal culture&quot; keeping you suppressed and degraded as a woman. (And, on occasion, it is).The result of that mindset is that you get to be &quot;right&quot; 100% of the time, without question or resistance. And who, frankly, doesn&#039;t like to be in that position?The things that were said about Hillary were pretty awful, and a good percentage of it were a pack of lies. But somehow it&#039;s &quot;worse&quot; if you treat a woman this way, but when men from either party are smeared and insulted -- justly or unjustly -- and just as egregiously, it just doesn&#039;t register in the same way... &#039;Cause nobody has insulted Mama.But if you trash Hillary, you&#039;ve insulted Mama.So it&#039;s misogyny and &quot;we need to start having conversations about that!&quot; as if we don&#039;t talk about the evils of misogyny constantly in the culture and in the media. It&#039;s an incessant drone.Like Hillary&#039;s assertion that &quot;women are the main victims of war&quot; which no one even blinked an eye at.Hillary was treated badly, any fool can see that, but no worse than any man who ran as the frontrunner of the Democratic party, or served as its head, in recent decades.And given her own point that she won the popular vote by nearly 4 million ballots, giving her the most votes of any presidential candidate ever,&nbsp; then it should be self-evident that it&#039;s not &quot;misogyny/sexism/the-patriarchy&quot; that prevented her from re-entering The White House, but the electoral college which was always designed to subvert the will of the people on behalf of white slave owners (and apparently still is, and for that very reason) or perhaps her own failure to campaign in the working class swing states, or possibly Russian tampering or even hacking.So if she were to blame &quot;racism&quot; it would actually by more accurate (as that&#039;s the original, and continued?, reason for the electoral college) or the ruthlessness of the political right and their possible treason and collusion with fascist dictators overseas.But when she (and her blinder PC/SJW supporters) just scream &quot;misogyny!&quot; yet again because they prefer that righteously simplistic narrative, then they&#039;re actually avoiding the real issues which resulted in her loss and belittling the existence of actual sexism.I remind folks that I voted for her twice in 2016. And still would.But her claims that she had the White House stolen from her because she&#039;s a woman, or because of&nbsp; sabotage from Bernie Sanders she&#039;s currently lying about (and in fact projecting upon him) only degrades herself and should.And it only fuels her detractors and gives their arguments against her about her &quot;entitlement&quot; the tinge of validity. Even though they&#039;re admittedly largely pigs in their own right.<img src="https://imgs.6sqft.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/26203203/Trump-Clinton-Sanders-e1460751567993.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Snarky Oracle!, post: 81712, member: 57984"] Yes, and the women in particular don't know what else to say. They've been culturally bred to think any opposition and any lack of praise is automatically "misogyny." They really don't know how else to process it. When Bill Clinton was slaughtered unreasonably in the '90s and beyond, he wasn't in a position to claim sexism (and in fact was [B]accused [/B]of it just because he like a little side snatch). And when Obama was lacerated insanely for 8 years, even though he could have screamed "racism" (and some did) he instead chose to say, "Look, I was black [B]before [/B]I was elected..." But not a woman and not Hillary. Has anyone witnessed in their real lives how women respond to any criticism, as opposed to how men respond to it? Be that criticism accurate or false? Women, of course, will respond "but all we [B]get [/B]is criticism!" which is really not true at all, but they genuinely don't realize the falseness of that argument. It's so ingrained. If you don't get what you want, or if someone insults you, then it's automatically "sexism" and "misogyny" and the "patriarchal culture" keeping you suppressed and degraded as a woman. (And, on occasion, it is). The result of that mindset is that you get to be "right" 100% of the time, without question or resistance. And who, frankly, doesn't like to be in that position? The things that were said about Hillary were pretty awful, and a good percentage of it were a pack of lies. But somehow it's "worse" if you treat a woman this way, but when men from either party are smeared and insulted -- justly or unjustly -- and just as egregiously, it just doesn't register in the same way... 'Cause nobody has insulted Mama. But if you trash Hillary, you've insulted Mama. So it's misogyny and "we need to start having conversations about that!" as if we don't talk about the evils of misogyny [B]constantly [/B]in the culture and in the media. It's an incessant drone. Like Hillary's assertion that "women are the main victims of war" which no one even blinked an eye at. Hillary was treated badly, any fool can see that, but no worse than any man who ran as the frontrunner of the Democratic party, or served as its head, in recent decades. And given her own point that she won the popular vote by nearly 4 million ballots, giving her the most votes of any presidential candidate [B]ever, [/B]then it should be self-evident that it's not "misogyny/sexism/the-patriarchy" that prevented her from re-entering The White House, but the [B]electoral college [/B]which was always designed to subvert the will of the people on behalf of white slave owners (and apparently still is, and for that very reason) [B]or [/B]perhaps her own failure to campaign in the working class swing states, [B]or [/B]possibly Russian tampering or even hacking. So if she were to blame "racism" it would actually by more accurate (as that's the original, and continued?, reason for the electoral college) or the ruthlessness of the political right and their possible treason and collusion with fascist dictators overseas. But when she (and her blinder PC/SJW supporters) just scream "misogyny!" yet again because they prefer that righteously simplistic narrative, then they're actually avoiding the [B]real [/B]issues which resulted in her loss and belittling the existence of [B]actual [/B]sexism. I remind folks that I voted for her twice in 2016. And still would. But her claims that she had the White House stolen from her because she's a woman, or because of sabotage from Bernie Sanders she's currently lying about (and in fact projecting upon him) only degrades herself and should. And it only fuels her detractors and gives their arguments against her about her "entitlement" the tinge of validity. Even though they're admittedly largely pigs in their own right. [IMG]https://imgs.6sqft.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/26203203/Trump-Clinton-Sanders-e1460751567993.jpg[/IMG] [/QUOTE]

Verification

6 + 4 =