Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Willie Oleson" data-source="post: 34686" data-attributes="member: 8">And the ones who didn&#039;t vote for Trump or Clinton also didn&#039;t want Clinton as president. Trump got the biggest percentage of votes, I&#039;m not saying that this was the ideal outcome, but it was fair, wasn&#039;t it? And the people of America did this, it was their decision to vote for Trump and not to vote - en masse - for Clinton.But was it general speech against hate? Either way, she had the right to do it. I don&#039;t know if it was the proper occasion to do so...maybe it was.I can&#039;t disagree with that, and Trump definitely deserves the criticism. &quot;I don&#039;t think it can be said enough times&quot;...well, at some point it starts to feel like beating a dead horse, or ammunition disguised as genuine concern for that disabled person. It&#039;s not like anyone can un-do what happened, so is it really necessary to jump on the bandwagon and revive the story over and over again? And does the disabled reporter even want to be the victim?*If* Trump as president is a disaster, then it&#039;s not because he won, but because he was considered for the election in the first place. America should have stopped it right there and then.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Willie Oleson, post: 34686, member: 8"] And the ones who didn't vote for Trump [I]or[/I] Clinton also didn't want Clinton as president. Trump got the biggest percentage of votes, I'm not saying that this was the [I]ideal[/I] outcome, but it was [I]fair[/I], wasn't it? And the people of America did this, it was their decision to vote for Trump and not to vote - en masse - for Clinton. But was it general speech against hate? Either way, she had the right to do it. I don't know if it was the proper occasion to do so...maybe it was. I can't disagree with that, and Trump definitely deserves the criticism. "I don't think it can be said enough times"...well, at [I]some[/I] point it starts to feel like beating a dead horse, or ammunition disguised as genuine concern for that disabled person. It's not like anyone can un-do what happened, so is it really necessary to jump on the bandwagon and revive the story over and over again? And does the disabled reporter even [I]want[/I] to be the victim? *If* Trump as president is a disaster, then it's not because he won, but because he was considered for the election in the first place. America should have stopped it right there and then. [/QUOTE]

Verification

What month follows July?