Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Awards
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Forums
Dynasty
Dynasty
DYNASTY versus DALLAS versus KNOTS LANDING versus the rest of them
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Willie Oleson" data-source="post: 104711" data-attributes="member: 8"><p>Yes, first there was Falcon Crest, then LOST.</p><p>And while there is something sadistically funny about the fact that a new character manages to spoil <em>the few good things</em> that happened to Maggie, I wonder why they felt they had to go back to square one (again) in order to progress the story. Because it's not only an addition but also an alteration. OK, fine, Falcon Crest's storylines were never very sacred, but at this point it looks as if they don't have much story to tell, almost as if they don't know how to move on after Chase's death.</p><p>It's not that they shouldn't use things from the past, but this is so out of the blue, unlike (for example) Roger Grimes - a character that was already shrouded in mystery and hinted at the pre-Dynasty era. And that's why the season 9 mystery was a satisfactory conclusion, eventhough they tampered with the some of the original "facts". But I doubt many viewers remembered who-said-what 7 years earlier.</p><p></p><p>"I know that he knows that I know that he knows"...it's so fascinating when people are aware of eachother's lies and then agree to go along with it. I think it happens a lot in real life too.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Willie Oleson, post: 104711, member: 8"] Yes, first there was Falcon Crest, then LOST. And while there is something sadistically funny about the fact that a new character manages to spoil [I]the few good things[/I] that happened to Maggie, I wonder why they felt they had to go back to square one (again) in order to progress the story. Because it's not only an addition but also an alteration. OK, fine, Falcon Crest's storylines were never very sacred, but at this point it looks as if they don't have much story to tell, almost as if they don't know how to move on after Chase's death. It's not that they shouldn't use things from the past, but this is so out of the blue, unlike (for example) Roger Grimes - a character that was already shrouded in mystery and hinted at the pre-Dynasty era. And that's why the season 9 mystery was a satisfactory conclusion, eventhough they tampered with the some of the original "facts". But I doubt many viewers remembered who-said-what 7 years earlier. "I know that he knows that I know that he knows"...it's so fascinating when people are aware of eachother's lies and then agree to go along with it. I think it happens a lot in real life too. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What month follows July?
Post reply
Forums
Dynasty
Dynasty
DYNASTY versus DALLAS versus KNOTS LANDING versus the rest of them
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top