Forums
New posts
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Awards
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
A little forum update...We're planning an upgrade.
Find out more about what's planned and how you can help support the forum
Click here for the details
Forums
Telly Talk Soaps
UK Soaps Forum
EastEnders: What if Steve McFadden had left in 1999 instead of Ross Kemp?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="soapfan" data-source="post: 270525" data-attributes="member: 354"><p>Basically, the pub was a focal point, "The Queen Victoria" - Phil eventually lost as the landlord with Grant, and the opposite could easily have happened with Grant eventually becoming the sole owner of "The Arches".</p><p></p><p>Kathy/Grant would have had "Kathygate" in 1997-1998, 1999 and eventual Kathy/Grant marriage.</p><p></p><p>Kathy would have aborted Phil's baby and Phil NEVER knowing the gender of the baby, Sharon/Grant would have had a lesbian daughter and Sharon and/or Grant struggling to come to terms with it.</p><p></p><p>From 1999, Grant/would have took on Phil's good side as the Grant/Phil hybrid, "Sharongate" would <strong>NEVER have happened and instead been a one night stand</strong>, and left it there. </p><p></p><p><u>The 1999 Mitchell Car Crash, Phil/Grant argued etc as they did:-</u><strong> </strong></p><p><strong>The least they could have done with the story brought Sharon/Letitia Dean back to have it out with Kathy/Gillian Taylforth also - It's almost like deciding between the Manchester United side of 1994 and 1999, so the 1994 Manchester United side and a better improved EastEnders 1999 Mitchell Car Crash WITH the involvement of Sharon getting to grips with Kathy would have worked better in addition with Phil/Grant clashing ALSO.</strong></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="soapfan, post: 270525, member: 354"] Basically, the pub was a focal point, "The Queen Victoria" - Phil eventually lost as the landlord with Grant, and the opposite could easily have happened with Grant eventually becoming the sole owner of "The Arches". Kathy/Grant would have had "Kathygate" in 1997-1998, 1999 and eventual Kathy/Grant marriage. Kathy would have aborted Phil's baby and Phil NEVER knowing the gender of the baby, Sharon/Grant would have had a lesbian daughter and Sharon and/or Grant struggling to come to terms with it. From 1999, Grant/would have took on Phil's good side as the Grant/Phil hybrid, "Sharongate" would [B]NEVER have happened and instead been a one night stand[/B], and left it there. [U]The 1999 Mitchell Car Crash, Phil/Grant argued etc as they did:-[/U][B] The least they could have done with the story brought Sharon/Letitia Dean back to have it out with Kathy/Gillian Taylforth also - It's almost like deciding between the Manchester United side of 1994 and 1999, so the 1994 Manchester United side and a better improved EastEnders 1999 Mitchell Car Crash WITH the involvement of Sharon getting to grips with Kathy would have worked better in addition with Phil/Grant clashing ALSO.[/B] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
6 + 4 =
Post reply
Forums
Telly Talk Soaps
UK Soaps Forum
EastEnders: What if Steve McFadden had left in 1999 instead of Ross Kemp?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top