Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Laurie!" data-source="post: 429378" data-attributes="member: 2210">That&#039;s quite rich since you originally quoted yourself when you said that.Here&#039;s what I found on the subject of Twitter censorship:[URL unfurl=&quot;true&quot;]https://thehill.com/opinion/technology/3852594-the-twitter-bias-hearings-point-to-favoritism-but-not-for-liberals/[/URL]Here&#039;s what you said, &quot;my research skills are excellent, developed both educationally and professionally&quot;.&nbsp; You then mocked my high school education (which is all Charlie Kirk had btw).&nbsp; Seems like you think you&#039;re pretty great.Do you mean like Papa Putin?&nbsp; World leaders (including Russia) reject Trump&#039;s concepts of plans and framework of plans and his ever changing narrative...his kick the can &quot;two weeks&quot; down the road.&nbsp; I&#039;m not sure what else you want me to respond to while at the same time chastising me for deviating from the Kirks... &quot; another poster continues to belabor another topic, endlessly and inaccurately.&quot;I&#039;ve never said the US didn&#039;t contribute.&nbsp; I merely pointed out that they didn&#039;t and couldn&#039;t have done it alone.&nbsp; Continually denigrating the important contributions of other nations is one of the reasons Americans are known as &quot;blow hards&quot; around the world.Here&#039;s a fact...the US has never won a war without other countries helping.&nbsp; When you&#039;ve tried, you failed.I mean, I guess you won the Civil War but that was against yourselves.Of course there are and I&#039;m glad you recognize that since you said Canada only exists as we know it because of our proximity to the US.&nbsp; If that&#039;s the case, what happened with Mexico?&nbsp; Shouldn&#039;t they be prosperous and free too?Here&#039;s a Kirk topic for you...Charlie Kirk wouldn&#039;t have been in the job he was in without left wing talking points to debate against.&nbsp; I&#039;ll leave it at that and perhaps you can reflect on the irony of it all with your vilification of all things leftist.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Laurie!, post: 429378, member: 2210"] That's quite rich since you originally quoted yourself when you said that. Here's what I found on the subject of Twitter censorship: [URL unfurl="true"]https://thehill.com/opinion/technology/3852594-the-twitter-bias-hearings-point-to-favoritism-but-not-for-liberals/[/URL] Here's what you said, "my research skills are excellent, developed both educationally and professionally". You then mocked my high school education (which is all Charlie Kirk had btw). Seems like you think you're pretty great. Do you mean like Papa Putin? World leaders (including Russia) reject Trump's concepts of plans and framework of plans and his ever changing narrative...his kick the can "two weeks" down the road. I'm not sure what else you want me to respond to while at the same time chastising me for deviating from the Kirks... " another poster continues to belabor another topic, endlessly and inaccurately." I've never said the US didn't contribute. I merely pointed out that they didn't and couldn't have done it alone. Continually denigrating the important contributions of other nations is one of the reasons Americans are known as "blow hards" around the world. Here's a fact...the US has never won a war without other countries helping. When you've tried, you failed. I mean, I guess you won the Civil War but that was against yourselves. Of course there are and I'm glad you recognize that since you said Canada only exists as we know it because of our proximity to the US. If that's the case, what happened with Mexico? Shouldn't they be prosperous and free too? Here's a Kirk topic for you...Charlie Kirk wouldn't have been in the job he was in without left wing talking points to debate against. I'll leave it at that and perhaps you can reflect on the irony of it all with your vilification of all things leftist. [/QUOTE]

Verification

6 + 4 =