Menu
Forums
New posts
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Awards
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Forums
News & Politics
US Politics
Females & politics
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Frank Underwood" data-source="post: 22248" data-attributes="member: 35"><p>No, not just for the sake of it. That in itself is sexist. If we're going to go that route, how about electing Sarah Palin or Michelle Bachman president?</p><p></p><p>That's not to say that only men should be president. Women should have the same opportunity to run for the office as well. However, the decision has to come down to who has the best policy positions. I made the choice to vote for Jill Stein in this election because I agreed with her the most on policy. But between Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton, I thought Bernie was the best choice by far. And it was because of policy, not gender.</p><p></p><p></p><p>When talking about equality, I personally prefer the term "humanism" to feminism. It just sounds more inclusive to me. </p><p></p><p>As such, it should only be a victory for a woman to win if she had the best policy positions and leadership skills.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Same here. I see nothing inherently better about either gender. I care about policy, not what's between a person's legs.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Frank Underwood, post: 22248, member: 35"] No, not just for the sake of it. That in itself is sexist. If we're going to go that route, how about electing Sarah Palin or Michelle Bachman president? That's not to say that only men should be president. Women should have the same opportunity to run for the office as well. However, the decision has to come down to who has the best policy positions. I made the choice to vote for Jill Stein in this election because I agreed with her the most on policy. But between Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton, I thought Bernie was the best choice by far. And it was because of policy, not gender. When talking about equality, I personally prefer the term "humanism" to feminism. It just sounds more inclusive to me. As such, it should only be a victory for a woman to win if she had the best policy positions and leadership skills. Same here. I see nothing inherently better about either gender. I care about policy, not what's between a person's legs. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who played JR Ewing?
Post reply
Forums
News & Politics
US Politics
Females & politics
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top