Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Snarky Oracle!" data-source="post: 82599" data-attributes="member: 57984">So you came back anyway?And I&#039;m sure you took a few days to carefully compose the above post, to leave your version of what took place....No, Stanley, you started going after me in April of 2016, not July 2016 &quot;after&quot; I&#039;d put you on &quot;ignore&quot; ---- why would I put you on &quot;ignore&quot; before you started going after me ??And we had a terrible fight over Jason Colby? Really?? I don&#039;t even recall the topic, and if we&#039;d had a serious row over it, I&#039;d remember.And I &quot;sent you a PM that weekend&quot; asking why you were mad with me? And yet refused to respond to you because I had you on &quot;ignore&quot;? (That last part I remember).Oh, really? I think I clearly respected your posts and said so publicly and enthusiastically. I&#039;ve dealt with plenty of people on this board who &quot;opposed&quot; me --- almost everybody, at some point. No one agrees on everything. And, frankly, you and I seemed to agree about 95% of the topics, until you had your break in Spring 2016 and admitted you&#039;d been criticizing the show &quot;disingenuously&quot; for ages just to please me in some way, and you felt, essentially, dirty for it and had no intention of doing it any longer.So, I was like &#039;whaaaat??&#039; Wow. You really are full of it.And, no, it started in April 2016 which was when I put you on &quot;ignore&quot; and shut down to you totally for the next 18 months. You obviously have a reason for moving it forward to &quot;July&quot; -- and now I realize the role that shift has in your manufactured version of the narrative.Wow, again. Total malarkey.And that says it all, even though you don&#039;t seem to realize it.You &quot;feared&quot; you had lost me after crash? Really? Is that what your taunting me was about and my &quot;40,000 lost posts&quot;? Not that I minded all that much, but it seemed an odd way to communicate your sense of&nbsp; -- ahemmm --&nbsp; loss over my presence on the site ... especially since I hadn&#039;t responded to you in more than 6 months even then.Ahhh. the standard last minute confessional, designed to trick third party readers that you&#039;re on the up and up so they&#039;ll think the rest of your rewritten hogwash is objective and possibly accurate.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Snarky Oracle!, post: 82599, member: 57984"] So you came back anyway? And I'm sure you took a few days to carefully compose the above post, to leave your version of what took place.... No, Stanley, you started going after me in April of 2016, not July 2016 "after" I'd put you on "ignore" ---- why would I put you on "ignore" [B]before [/B]you started going after me ?? And we had a terrible fight over Jason Colby? Really?? I don't even recall the topic, and if we'd had a [I]serious [/I]row over it, I'd remember. And I "sent you a PM that weekend" asking why you were mad with me? And yet refused to respond to you because I had you on "ignore"? (That last part I remember). Oh, really? I think I [B]clearly [/B]respected your posts and said so publicly and enthusiastically. I've dealt with plenty of people on this board who "opposed" me --- almost everybody, at some point. No one agrees on everything. And, frankly, you and I seemed to agree about 95% of the topics, until you had your break in Spring 2016 and admitted you'd been criticizing the show "disingenuously" for ages just to please me in some way, and you felt, essentially, dirty for it and had no intention of doing it any longer. So, I was like '[I]whaaaat??' [/I] Wow. You really [B]are [/B]full of it. And, no, it started in April 2016 which was when I put you on "ignore" and shut down to you totally for the next 18 months. You obviously have a reason for moving it forward to "July" -- and now I realize the role that shift has in your manufactured version of the narrative. Wow, again. Total malarkey. And that says it all, even though you don't seem to realize it. You "feared" you had lost me after crash? Really? Is that what your taunting me was about and my "40,000 lost posts"? Not that I minded all that much, but it seemed an odd way to communicate your sense of -- [I]ahemmm [/I]-- loss over my presence on the site ... especially since I hadn't responded to you in more than 6 months even then. Ahhh. the standard last minute confessional, designed to trick third party readers that you're on the up and up so they'll think the rest of your rewritten hogwash is objective and possibly accurate. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Who played Sue Ellen in Dallas?