Menu
Forums
New posts
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Awards
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Forums
News & Politics
US Politics
#metoo
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Frank Underwood" data-source="post: 96108" data-attributes="member: 35"><p>Yes, I see it happen all the time. You have to walk on egg shells around them, and if you don't phrase things the way they want you to, they'll lump you in with the worst of the worst.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Yes, because who has time for an investigation? If a woman accuses a man of anything, he's obviously guilty because men are inherently evil.</p><p></p><p>At least that's what the misandrist third wavers would like us to believe. They want to doll out their brand of justice, and we're just supposed to shut up.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Tamblyn's always been that way. She's a huge Hillary Clinton supporter, and claimed outrage over Hillary's takeover of the DNC showed that we "treat women differently." As if the left would have been less upset if a man had done that. She also lumped Bernie Sanders in with Harvey Weinstein and Donald Trump as men who've caused women "all kinds of pain." When people pushed back, she admitted that Bernie was on the "other end of the spectrum" from Weinstein and Trump, but was still a "wound" for some women. Because, as we all know, a man is never to run against a woman in a primary. Why, that's just as bad as sexually assaulting and harassing women, don't you know? That's why I loathe identity politics.</p><p></p><p>She must keep her husband's balls in a jar. Wouldn't want any of his "toxic masculinity" to hurt anybody! Also, only a third wave feminist could make the idea of innocent until proven guilty and measured consequences seem like bad things. Guilty or innocent, friend or foe, men must take the fall. So yeah, Tamblyn sounds like a horrible person.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Frank Underwood, post: 96108, member: 35"] Yes, I see it happen all the time. You have to walk on egg shells around them, and if you don't phrase things the way they want you to, they'll lump you in with the worst of the worst. Yes, because who has time for an investigation? If a woman accuses a man of anything, he's obviously guilty because men are inherently evil. At least that's what the misandrist third wavers would like us to believe. They want to doll out their brand of justice, and we're just supposed to shut up. Tamblyn's always been that way. She's a huge Hillary Clinton supporter, and claimed outrage over Hillary's takeover of the DNC showed that we "treat women differently." As if the left would have been less upset if a man had done that. She also lumped Bernie Sanders in with Harvey Weinstein and Donald Trump as men who've caused women "all kinds of pain." When people pushed back, she admitted that Bernie was on the "other end of the spectrum" from Weinstein and Trump, but was still a "wound" for some women. Because, as we all know, a man is never to run against a woman in a primary. Why, that's just as bad as sexually assaulting and harassing women, don't you know? That's why I loathe identity politics. She must keep her husband's balls in a jar. Wouldn't want any of his "toxic masculinity" to hurt anybody! Also, only a third wave feminist could make the idea of innocent until proven guilty and measured consequences seem like bad things. Guilty or innocent, friend or foe, men must take the fall. So yeah, Tamblyn sounds like a horrible person. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What month follows July?
Post reply
Forums
News & Politics
US Politics
#metoo
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top