Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Rove" data-source="post: 103549" data-attributes="member: 100">Once again it&#039;s the he said/she said/he said scenario. And rather than go to the police in such matters they&#039;re running to the media. How does one come to the conclusion he is guilty or she is lying based on events which occured 30 odd years ago without any absolute proof? And this one got me laughing;Sweet Jesus I&#039;ve heard women and men use language (at work) that would make a sailor blush. Should I in 25 years go running to the media and tell my horrid story about the two elderly ladies in the tearoom swearing their heads off? Should I lodge a formal complaint when they speak about their monthly visitor or hot flushes? I suppose it&#039;s about context but when it comes to the media the story of course will favour the complainant. The lines of guilt are being blurred here. Now its guilt by media - not by a court/judge or jury.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Rove, post: 103549, member: 100"] Once again it's the he said/she said/he said scenario. And rather than go to the police in such matters they're running [U][B]to[/B][/U] the media. How does one come to the conclusion he is guilty or she is lying based on events which occured 30 odd years ago without any absolute proof? And this one got me laughing; Sweet Jesus I've heard women and men use language (at work) that would make a sailor blush. Should I in 25 years go running to the media and tell my horrid story about the two elderly ladies in the tearoom swearing their heads off? Should I lodge a formal complaint when they speak about their monthly visitor or hot flushes? I suppose it's about context but when it comes to the media the story of course will favour the complainant. The lines of guilt are being blurred here. Now its guilt by media - not by a court/judge or jury. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Who played JR Ewing?