Mueller Accuses Russians of Pro-Trump, Anti-Clinton Meddling

Frank Underwood

Telly Talk Champion
LV
3
 
Awards
9
U.S. Special Counsel Robert Mueller unveiled the details of a widespread and coordinated campaign by Russians to influence the U.S. presidential election in favor of Donald Trump, delivering on his initial mandate by the Justice Department.

In an indictment announced Friday in Washington, Mueller describes a years-long, multimillion-dollar conspiracy by hundreds of Russians aimed at criticizing Hillary Clinton and supporting Senator Bernie Sanders and Trump. Mueller charged 13 Russian nationals and three Russian entities and accused them of defrauding the U.S. government by interfering with the political process.

Prosecutors provided a remarkably detailed picture of how Russians used social media, fake rallies and secretive operatives in the U.S. to create “political intensity” by backing radical groups, opposition social movements and disaffected voters. The outreach from the Russians included direct contact with over 100 Americans.

This “information warfare” by the Russians didn’t affect the outcome of the presidential election, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein told reporters. Trump and his Republican supporters have repeatedly denounced the Mueller investigation as a “witch hunt” and have denied any collusion. The indictment cites no instances of Russians coordinating directly with the Trump campaign.

Still, the accusations detail unprecedented foreign attempts to influence the outcome of a U.S. election, including the manipulation of accounts at big U.S. companies like Facebook, Twitter, PayPal and Instagram. Those companies will continue to face pressure to clamp down on fraudulent accounts or risk a government crackdown as intelligence officials have warned that Russians are already engaged in influencing the 2018 midterm elections.

The president has been briefed on the indictment, the White House said. The Russian government called the accusations absurd. Mueller’s office said that none of the defendants was in custody.

Beyond the 13 people indicted, Mueller announced the Feb. 12 guilty plea of a California man for identity theft, Richard Pinedo, who is cooperating with prosecutors. The indictment of Russian individuals and companies also suggests a broader conspiracy than Mueller charged, saying grand jurors heard about others involved in the scheme.

Richard Painter, who was the chief ethics adviser in the George W. Bush administration, said the lack of any evidence of collusion in the indictment wasn’t the final word by prosecutors.

“They’re charging what they know,” he said. “The contact with the Trump campaign might be unwitting in this case, but that doesn’t mean that the collaboration issue is finished.”

Click here to read the indictment in full.

The Internet Research Agency, a Russian organization, and the defendants began working in 2014 to interfere in U.S. elections, according to the indictment. They used false personas and social media while also staging political rallies and communicating with “unwitting individuals” associated with the Trump campaign, it said.

In a Feb. 10, 2016, planning memo, the Russians were instructed to “use any opportunity to criticize Hillary and the rest (except Sanders and Trump -- we support them).”

The operations also denigrated candidates including Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio, Trump’s rivals in the 2016 Republican primary, the indictment said.

The efforts included contact with “unwitting” Trump campaign officials, with the goal of “impairing, obstructing, and defeating the lawful government functions” including the election.

Mueller’s Case of Russian Meddling in U.S. Election: Highlights

The group bought advertisements on U.S. social media and created numerous Twitter accounts designed to appear as if they were U.S. groups or people, according to the indictment. One fake account, @TEN_GOP account, attracted more than 100,000 online followers.

The Russians tracked the metrics of their effort in reports and budgeted for their efforts. Some traveled to the U.S. to gather intelligence for the surreptitious campaign, according to the indictment. They used stolen U.S. identities, including fake drivers licenses, and contacted news media outlets to promote their activities.

In September 2016, the group ordered one worker to “intensify criticizing Hillary Clinton” after a review found insufficient anti-Clinton activity.

The effort went well beyond social media. The Russian effort included organizing rallies for Trump and paying Americans to participate in them or perform tasks at them. One American was paid to build a cage on a flatbed truck; another was paid to portray Clinton in a prison uniform.

Rallies were promoted with Facebook ads. Paid ads included this one on Oct. 19, 2016: “Hillary is a Satan, and her crimes and lies had proved just how evil she is.”

Mueller Charges Against Russians Highlight Florida Trump Rallies

After the election, the group organized both pro- and anti-Trump rallies, including a “Trump is NOT my President” rally in New York the week after the election and one in Charlotte, North Carolina, the following week.

The Russian organization had settled on Trump as their favored candidate by at least April 2016 and began producing and purchasing ads promoting the reality-TV star to voters and “expressly opposing Clinton,” according to the indictment.

In June 2016, the defendants allegedly posed as grassroots activists using the account @March_for_Trump to contact a volunteer for the Trump campaign in New York. The volunteer agreed to provide signs for their “March for Trump” rally, according to the indictment. By August, the accused Russians were communicating with unwitting Trump campaign staff involved in local community outreach to discuss their fraudulent “Florida Goes Trump” rallies.

Two years before the election, the Russians began monitoring groups that use social media sites to influence U.S. politics and social issues, tracking the size of groups and how popular they were with their audiences, according to the indictment.

‘Drop Phones’
Several Russians traveled around the U.S. to gather intelligence for their operation, posing as U.S. political and social activists. They used clandestine methods to communicate and gather information, employing special cameras, “drop phones” and “evacuation scenarios” to ensure security.

The Russians set up Facebook and Instagram groups with names that targeted such issues as immigration, religion and the Black Lives Matter movement. They also controlled numerous Twitter groups that appeared to be controlled by U.S. people, such as “Tennessee GOP.”

They spent thousands of dollars a month to buy advertisements on social media groups, while carefully tracking the size of U.S. audiences they reached, according to the indictment.

These Are the Russians Accused of Meddling in the 2016 Election

All of the people and companies charged in Friday’s indictment were connected in some way to the Internet Research Agency, a company widely reported to be a front for Russian government influence campaigns on social media. The company and 12 of its current or former executives and employees were charged.

Prosecutors also charged Yevgeniy Viktorivich Prigozhin, a Russian restaurateur and caterer widely known as “Putin’s chef” for hosting his state dinners with foreign dignitaries, and two of his companies. The companies, Concord Catering and Concord Management and Consulting, have Russian government contracts. The special counsel alleges that they provided the financing for the Internet Research Agency’s operations.

“Americans are very impressionable people, they see what they want to see. I have great respect for them. I’m not at all upset that I ended up on this list. If they want to see the devil - let them see it,” Prigozhin told RIA Novosti.

Source: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...ed-up-affair-with-ex-playmate-new-yorker-says
 

Frank Underwood

Telly Talk Champion
LV
3
 
Awards
9
I read another article that mentioned Russia also pushed support for Jill Stein after Sanders had officially been screwed over by the DNC.

According to an article on Vox, "Russian operatives used accounts they controlled — including an account called 'Woke Blacks' and 'Blacktivist' — to urge Americans to vote for third-party candidates or not to vote at all. 'Choose peace and vote for Jill Stein,' one such message read. 'Trust me, it’s not a wasted vote.'"

So naturally, both Sanders and Stein are receiving criticism for not speaking out about it. Sanders has actually been quite vocal when it comes to Russian interference. He has always supported this claim. In light of these indictments, Sanders said "It has been clear to everyone (except Donald Trump) that Russia was deeply involved in the 2016 elections and intends to meddle in the 2018 elections." Of course, that's not enough for some corporatist Dems who are upset that he didn't mention Russia's alleged support for him. It's also worth noting that these are the same Dems who've tried to undermine the content of the DNC and Podesta emails, which indicated that the primaries were rigged against Sanders.

As for Stein, many have believed she's a Russian puppet since the photo of her at a dinner with Putin was released. However, Stein claims she attended the dinner to push peace with the Middle East, and that she was never introduced to Putin because there were no interpreters at the table. She said she was introduced to Flynn, but after she briefly discussed her peace initiative with him, the conversation ended abruptly because he wasn't interested. She seems truthful to me, and considering she also ran for president in 2012, it's hard for me to believe that she's part of some Russian plot to interfere in the election. Not to mention the fact that her platform has remained consistent, and couldn't be further from Trump's.

Of course, that hasn't stopped some on the left from going after her in light of these allegations. In their minds, it reinforces what they already believe about progressives who didn't support Hillary. I can't speak for all progressives, but I never saw any of the fake ads that came from Russia. My decision to vote for Jill Stein was based purely on my rejection of Hillary's neoliberalism and Trump's neoconservatism. They were two terrible choices IMO, and I also felt it was important to look beyond one election cycle. The DNC's pied piper strategy, which called for legitimizing Trump in the media, helped give us Trump as much or more than fake ads and rallies. Not to mention the sabotage of Bernie in the primaries.

I also have several takeaways from the article. The first regards this statement: "The accusations detail unprecedented foreign attempts to influence the outcome of a U.S. election." Hmm, so who prosecutes members of the US government when they do that? Has Hillary been investigated for saying elections in Palestine should have been halted until we were sure we could control the outcome? Of course not. Was Bush prosecuted for war crimes by illegally invading Iraq and overthrowing Saddam? Of course not. It's okay when we do it.

Here's the second thing I found interesting: "The Internet Research Agency, a Russian organization, and the defendants began working in 2014 to interfere in U.S. elections, according to the indictment." I hate to agree with Trump on anything, but as he tweeted, he wasn't even a candidate in 2014. Bill Maher said Russia's main goal was to create chaos, which is why they backed the "chaos candidate." The article states that they hadn't even settled on Trump until April 2016. It seems to me that Russia's agenda was more anti-Hillary than pro-Trump. Why else would they have also supported Sanders and Stein when their platforms are the antithesis of Trump's? The indictment states that Russia “had a strategic goal to sow discord in the U.S. political system, including the 2016 U.S. presidential election.” Perhaps they colluded with Trump after he became the Republican candidate, or perhaps there was no collusion at all. Either way, it seems pretty clear to me that Russia's primary objective was keeping Hillary Clinton out of the White House.

The unfortunate consequence of that is that it has emboldened establishment Dems to shutdown progressives who criticize them. If you oppose neoliberalism, corporatism, militarism, and believe Dems like Hillary are too far to the right, they'll label you a Russian stooge who fell for propaganda. Never mind that those criticisms of Hillary and Dems are valid, with or without Russian influence. Like identity politics and faux cries of sexism, Russian interference has allowed Democrats to turn a blind eye to the shitty policies they support. Republicans wear their conservatism like a badge of honor, while Democrats give lip service to progressives while supporting war, Wall Street, big pharma, big oil, etc.

And isn't it also funny how Democrats who claim to resist Trump and still believe he colluded with Russia voted to give him unlimited surveillance powers and caved on DACA.

But why criticize them or try to reform our broken political system when we can blame all of our woes on Russia.
 
Top