Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Angela Channing" data-source="post: 192115" data-attributes="member: 33"><p>Because a child who has been groomed and trafficked would be considered to be vulnerable and so legally would not be considered able to give consent. Therefore being 16 or 17 wouldn't be a factor by law. Beyond age 18, the person involved couldn't be considered to be "vulnerable child" although they could be a "vulnerable adult", if for example they had a mental disability.</p></blockquote><p></p>