Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Zable" data-source="post: 192655" data-attributes="member: 47">This was the picture I was referring to when I made this comment:&nbsp;and I believe that&#039;s the same picture that Emily Maitlis and Prince Andrew were discussing at the 23 min mark of the video. Ms Maitlis said to the prince that his friend thought the photograph was doctored; by &#039;friend&#039; I think she means Ms Maxwell. Daily Mail also says that Ms Maxwell had said she thought the photograph was doctored, but didn&#039;t report when and to whom Ms Maxwell said that. In court in the US, when VG sued her, perhaps?Assuming this picture (above) is the photograph Ms Maitlis and Prince Andrew were discussing.... The prince said it couldn&#039;t be proven that the photograph was doctored&nbsp;&nbsp; “because it is a photograph of a photograph of a photograph”. Only he knows what he means by that and where he learnt that from, but note that he doesn’t say it’s a digital copy of a photograph or even a reprint of a photo; so might he have been told that the images in that photograph come from 3 different photographs, a composite cleverly put together to leave no trace? He says it’s definitely a photo of him in his travelling clothes, of which there are many such photographs, but everything else…. The photograph shows the upstairs of Ms Maxwell’s house. He doesn’t remember going upstairs. He claims not to allow many photographs of him with public displays of affection, so presumably he would remember those like this one and he says he doesn’t remember this one. He says he doesn’t believe that the photograph was taken in the way it was suggested. To prove him wrong in his recollection, all Virginia Giuffre nee Roberts needs to do is produce the original photograph, as Prince Andrew himself says in the interview.I was under the impression she hadn&#039;t spoken to the FBI.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Zable, post: 192655, member: 47"] This was the picture I was referring to when I made this comment: and I believe that's the same picture that Emily Maitlis and Prince Andrew were discussing at the 23 min mark of the video. Ms Maitlis said to the prince that his friend thought the photograph was doctored; by 'friend' I think she means Ms Maxwell. Daily Mail also says that Ms Maxwell had said she thought the photograph was doctored, but didn't report when and to whom Ms Maxwell said that. In court in the US, when VG sued her, perhaps? Assuming this picture (above) is the photograph Ms Maitlis and Prince Andrew were discussing.... The prince said it couldn't be proven that the photograph was doctored “because it is a photograph of a photograph of a photograph”. Only he knows what he means by that and where he learnt that from, but note that he doesn’t say it’s a digital copy of a photograph or even a reprint of a photo; so might he have been told that the images in that photograph come from 3 different photographs, a composite cleverly put together to leave no trace? He says it’s definitely a photo of him in his travelling clothes, of which there are many such photographs, but everything else…. The photograph shows the upstairs of Ms Maxwell’s house. He doesn’t remember going upstairs. He claims not to allow many photographs of him with public displays of affection, so presumably he would remember those like this one and he says he doesn’t remember this one. He says he doesn’t believe that the photograph was taken in the way it was suggested. To prove him wrong in his recollection, all Virginia Giuffre nee Roberts needs to do is produce the original photograph, as Prince Andrew himself says in the interview. I was under the impression she hadn't spoken to the FBI. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Who played JR Ewing?