Menu
Forums
New posts
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Awards
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Forums
Speciality TV
Comics On Screen
The Batman
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="darkshadows38" data-source="post: 318963" data-attributes="member: 19"><p>Adam West as much as i loved his Batman don't get me wrong isn't how Batman should be, they had watered down the comics so much by (1966) that it was a mere shell of what it was Originally. i haven't read any of the 60's comics yet i'm up to (1955) digital wise i mean, & The Thing is in the Original Comics from the late 30's to about at some point i'd say Spring of (1954) i think? or was it spring (1955) i forget which when they introduced the comics code they watered down the comics all of them really. Batman is meant to be a dark as hell character it was a really dark comic book back than before the code as it should be with Serial killers and such. and it went even goofier when the show was on in the mid 60's. but when Denny O'Neil one of my favorite writers joined DC in i think it was Dec. of (1969) or was it Dec of (1970)? i forget which he brought back Two face who hadn't been used in shit 17 years i think? he in short made the comic dark again as it's suppose to be.</p><p></p><p>Bruce is a guy who's really f.. up in the head over seeing his parents get killed as a kid and while he's a really smart guy it well you know the Origin. what's funny about the 60's show was the only reason they did the BAM, POW's at all was cause they didn't have the money for really anything so to cover that they went cheap and just put those in. it was cheap to do that's really the only reason</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="darkshadows38, post: 318963, member: 19"] Adam West as much as i loved his Batman don't get me wrong isn't how Batman should be, they had watered down the comics so much by (1966) that it was a mere shell of what it was Originally. i haven't read any of the 60's comics yet i'm up to (1955) digital wise i mean, & The Thing is in the Original Comics from the late 30's to about at some point i'd say Spring of (1954) i think? or was it spring (1955) i forget which when they introduced the comics code they watered down the comics all of them really. Batman is meant to be a dark as hell character it was a really dark comic book back than before the code as it should be with Serial killers and such. and it went even goofier when the show was on in the mid 60's. but when Denny O'Neil one of my favorite writers joined DC in i think it was Dec. of (1969) or was it Dec of (1970)? i forget which he brought back Two face who hadn't been used in shit 17 years i think? he in short made the comic dark again as it's suppose to be. Bruce is a guy who's really f.. up in the head over seeing his parents get killed as a kid and while he's a really smart guy it well you know the Origin. what's funny about the 60's show was the only reason they did the BAM, POW's at all was cause they didn't have the money for really anything so to cover that they went cheap and just put those in. it was cheap to do that's really the only reason [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who played JR Ewing?
Post reply
Forums
Speciality TV
Comics On Screen
The Batman
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top