Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Brian Kinney" data-source="post: 362669" data-attributes="member: 3219">Fully agree. I think it&#039;s perverse to be born into a cage. When raised in childhood they get brainwashed by a &quot;company&quot; that consists also of people who aren&#039;t family (family members are terrible enough with their negligence as you&#039;ve pointed out) but don&#039;t act in their interest (that would mean to get any children out of the cage, as responsible teachers would help to get kids out of a household with cult-like mental abuse).&nbsp; Today many people use the term &quot;groomed&quot;. The Royal Trumans are an example of groomed people over centuries. But thanks to the yellow press asslickers (their publishers, writers and readers) these people are glorified while I guess only a small number of people of them is able to identify anyone who won a Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in the last 50 years. Or know the names of their next neighbours. This crazy mass hypnosis led to such spectacles as Diana&#039;s and the Queen&#039;s funerals. Do they attend their next neighbour&#039;s funerals too? I doubt it. Because no one toasted their brains over decades with an endless soap about them.There are monarchies in Europe who spent less money on their RFs than others or they make attempts to reduce costs&nbsp; or where they&#039;re more transparent but it&#039;s still a system that allows children to be born into a cage facing constant public observation. For me the latter is a bigger problem than the financial costs (because I&#039;m aware that a Republic with a President is no guarantee for not wasting money elsewhere).</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Brian Kinney, post: 362669, member: 3219"] Fully agree. I think it's perverse to be born into a cage. When raised in childhood they get brainwashed by a "company" that consists also of people who aren't family (family members are terrible enough with their negligence as you've pointed out) but don't act in their interest (that would mean to get any children out of the cage, as responsible teachers would help to get kids out of a household with cult-like mental abuse). Today many people use the term "groomed". The Royal Trumans are an example of groomed people over centuries. But thanks to the yellow press asslickers (their publishers, writers and readers) these people are glorified while I guess only a small number of people of them is able to identify anyone who won a Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in the last 50 years. Or know the names of their next neighbours. This crazy mass hypnosis led to such spectacles as Diana's and the Queen's funerals. Do they attend their next neighbour's funerals too? I doubt it. Because no one toasted their brains over decades with an endless soap about them. There are monarchies in Europe who spent less money on their RFs than others or they make attempts to reduce costs or where they're more transparent but it's still a system that allows children to be born into a cage facing constant public observation. For me the latter is a bigger problem than the financial costs (because I'm aware that a Republic with a President is no guarantee for not wasting money elsewhere). [/QUOTE]

Verification

6 + 4 =