Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Angela Channing" data-source="post: 410340" data-attributes="member: 33">People can read back all the posts and make up their own minds whether or not I&#039;ve misrepresented you.&nbsp; I will add this though, there are many reasons why a woman delays reporting a rape and although that adds difficulties for a court to reach a verdict regarding whether she was abused, when it does reach a verdict, our reaction shouldn&#039;t be to cast doubt on it. Issues like the judge was appointed by Clinton is irrelevant when a jury, not the judge, reached the verdict and there was absolutely no evidence of the judge being biased. You are right to say &quot;it&#039;s hard to prove rape claims from decades ago&quot; which is why when it happens we have to appreciate the strength of evidence that made the jury come to that conclusion.Also, claiming that because a rape survivor was funded by a Democrat supporter means we shouldn&#039;t have to accept the verdict is nonsense when that wouldn&#039;t have been a factor in the jury&#039;s decision. I&#039;m glad that someone was there for the rape survivor so she could finally get the justice she deserved and I don&#039;t care what their political affiliations are any more than Trump cared about the political affiliations of the the woman when he raped her. Trump had a fair trial and the verdict was that the allegations of rape was &quot;substantially true&quot;. I think we should accept that and not try to make excuses for Trump being found responsible.I make no apologies for repeatedly bringing up that Trump is a rapist. Some crimes are so heinous that it should be a decisive factor in determining whether or not someone should be President. I&#039;m not talking about unproven allegations, I&#039;m talking about a court ruling on the facts.Political decisions that a President makes while in office is, according to your Supreme Court, are not illegal so it&#039;s up to American voters to decide whether or not those are a factor for them to consider when deciding how they should vote. Trying to suggest there is any equivalence between those decisions and Trump committing rape is complete nonsense and shameful. Hunter Biden should be irrelevant to this discussion because he&#039;s not standing to be President.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Angela Channing, post: 410340, member: 33"] People can read back all the posts and make up their own minds whether or not I've misrepresented you. I will add this though, there are many reasons why a woman delays reporting a rape and although that adds difficulties for a court to reach a verdict regarding whether she was abused, when it does reach a verdict, our reaction shouldn't be to cast doubt on it. Issues like the judge was appointed by Clinton is irrelevant when a jury, not the judge, reached the verdict and there was absolutely no evidence of the judge being biased. You are right to say "it's hard to prove rape claims from decades ago" which is why when it happens we have to appreciate the strength of evidence that made the jury come to that conclusion. Also, claiming that because a rape survivor was funded by a Democrat supporter means we shouldn't have to accept the verdict is nonsense when that wouldn't have been a factor in the jury's decision. I'm glad that someone was there for the rape survivor so she could finally get the justice she deserved and I don't care what their political affiliations are any more than Trump cared about the political affiliations of the the woman when he raped her. Trump had a fair trial and the verdict was that the allegations of rape was "substantially true". I think we should accept that and not try to make excuses for Trump being found responsible. I make no apologies for repeatedly bringing up that Trump is a rapist. Some crimes are so heinous that it should be a decisive factor in determining whether or not someone should be President. I'm not talking about unproven allegations, I'm talking about a court ruling on the facts. Political decisions that a President makes while in office is, according to your Supreme Court, are not illegal so it's up to American voters to decide whether or not those are a factor for them to consider when deciding how they should vote. Trying to suggest there is any equivalence between those decisions and Trump committing rape is complete nonsense and shameful. Hunter Biden should be irrelevant to this discussion because he's not standing to be President. [/QUOTE]

Verification

6 + 4 =