Forums
New posts
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Awards
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Poison your name this Hallowe'en
There's plenty of time to choose your spooky October username
Click here for more details
Forums
Dallas the TV series
Dallas TNT
TNT revived Dallas for a 2012–14 series. Would you revisit it again?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="the-lost-son" data-source="post: 265631" data-attributes="member: 672"><p>Yes. It's actually quite easy. The Romeo/Juliet story carried into the new generation.</p><p>JR/Sue Ellen and Cliff/Afton as the new in-laws right from the start.</p><p>And then you got Christopher (Is it because I'm adopted?) as the new villain who creates conflict/drama all over the place:</p><p>Smart producers wouldn't have them fight only over Ewing Oil, but also over Barnes&Wentworth/Barnes Global - now between Pamela, Christopher and an offspring of Katherine (in best scenario JR's daughterwith Katherine). It was unnecessary to melt Ewing Oil & Barnes Wentworth into one. If you stay focused on the Ewings and the Barnes you can see all the offspring to be included and don't get tempted to include all these Rylands/Ramos no one ever heard of/cared about.</p><p></p><p>I agree that the timing didn't help either. In 2012 it was too late. Ten years earlier would have been helpful.</p><p>Or ten years later. I hardly watched/didn't like ABC's Dynasty. But I read that CW's Dynasty got picked up for a 5th season although the writing doesn't appear to be phenomenal (apparantly Krystle was recast several times, correct me if I'm wrong).</p><p>As Dallas was an international phenomenan maybe a global streaming provider would have had more success (despite it's many flaws).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="the-lost-son, post: 265631, member: 672"] Yes. It's actually quite easy. The Romeo/Juliet story carried into the new generation. JR/Sue Ellen and Cliff/Afton as the new in-laws right from the start. And then you got Christopher (Is it because I'm adopted?) as the new villain who creates conflict/drama all over the place: Smart producers wouldn't have them fight only over Ewing Oil, but also over Barnes&Wentworth/Barnes Global - now between Pamela, Christopher and an offspring of Katherine (in best scenario JR's daughterwith Katherine). It was unnecessary to melt Ewing Oil & Barnes Wentworth into one. If you stay focused on the Ewings and the Barnes you can see all the offspring to be included and don't get tempted to include all these Rylands/Ramos no one ever heard of/cared about. I agree that the timing didn't help either. In 2012 it was too late. Ten years earlier would have been helpful. Or ten years later. I hardly watched/didn't like ABC's Dynasty. But I read that CW's Dynasty got picked up for a 5th season although the writing doesn't appear to be phenomenal (apparantly Krystle was recast several times, correct me if I'm wrong). As Dallas was an international phenomenan maybe a global streaming provider would have had more success (despite it's many flaws). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What month follows July?
Post reply
Forums
Dallas the TV series
Dallas TNT
TNT revived Dallas for a 2012–14 series. Would you revisit it again?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top