New posts

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Gabriel Maxwell" data-source="post: 36015" data-attributes="member: 121">Even Comey's FBI along with 15 other agencies all agree that Russia hacked the elections not to mention Trump finally admitting to it.How certain are we? How certain can any of us ever be? Do we have any means to verify the findings of the intelligence agencies?What's the point of having them if their findings are going to be rejected point blank because they don't suit one's political narrative?And thanks to Julian Assange - who's despised and attempted to harm Hillary Clinton for years - we know even Wikileaks has their own agenda and will gladly withhold information or lie if it suits them. They have zero credibility.Because the whole purpose of hacking the DNC was influencing the elections. Why else would the Russians hack the DNC then to try to discredit Hillary Clinton and ensure her loss in the election?The media have clearly reported the intelligence agencies agree there is no evidence of the voting machines actually being penetrated by the Russians.But the results of the hacking (i.e. the leaking of DNC emails), not to mention Comey's unprecedented 11th hour breaking of the Hatch Act, could have easily pushed Trump over the edge to give him his razor-thin victory margin in EC.John Lewis is right. Trump is not a legitimate president. How fitting for the era of fake news, the US would get a fake president.On top of Putin's personal grudge against Clinton (something he and Assange have in common), Russia seems like the culprit because of Exxon's record-breaking 2012 deal giving that company drilling potential that dwarfs what they have in the US, Canda and other countries combined.<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/17/business/energy-environment/exxon-and-russian-oil-company-agree-to-joint-projects.html" target="_blank">http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/17/business/energy-environment/exxon-and-russian-oil-company-agree-to-joint-projects.html</a>That deal came to a crashing halt thanks to the sanctions implemented by the Obama administration.Puttin's buddy Tillerson - who had traveled to Moscow despite State Department's recommendation that he not do so and then publicly mocked Obama's State Department on Russian soil and got a thumbs up from the laughing Russians - was going to be nominated for the SOS position from the get-go despite all that dog and pony show with Romney and others.Putin - who is as John McCain puts it "a thug and a murderer", because that's how he deals with political opponents - is eager to jump-start his  country's struggling economy, not to mention fill his own coffers that already make him the world's richest man. And he would not have been able to do so under Hillary Clinton.Surprise, surprise... Trump's already talking about lifting those sanctions, saying on Friday: "If you get along and if Russia is really helping us, why would anybody have sanctions if somebody's doing some really great things?"<img src="https://s28.postimg.org/3sjn8yi6l/Putin_SNL.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /> </blockquote>

Verification: Who played JR Ewing?