Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Gabriel Maxwell" data-source="post: 36209" data-attributes="member: 121">Oh, I don&#039;t disagree with you at all. Of course it contributed to her loss. But that&#039;s their political error, which at the end of the day they are entitled to making. They shouldn&#039;t, for their own sake, but they can.Hacking from a foreign power and the FBI boss abusing his position however is something very different. It&#039;s malevolent interference. And Clinton may have won the elections despite the DNC&#039;s political errors, had there not been that malevolent interference.Of course, as the intelligence leadership already underlined, there is unfortunately no definitive way to gauge the extent to which Russian hacking and Comey&#039;s dishonorable actions swayed the voters, unless there was a way to re-run the elections in a parallel universe.Unless evidence comes to light that the Trump campaign colluded with the Russians prior to the elections, which would invalidate their victory and trigger a political scandal of Watergate magnitude.Even if that doesn&#039;t happen, I wouldn&#039;t mind if people kept pushing Trump&#039;s buttons calling him illegitimate and a fake president.Due to Trump&#039;s severe narcissistic personality disorder and complete lack of restraint when faced with even the mildest form of criticism, such repeated provocation could result in an embarrassing public meltdown episode.I certainly duly note all your criticism of Trump. But you do have a penchant for linking every discussion point to Hillary Clinton. Something you appear to share with Trump&#039;s paid shills, though for very different reasons. Yours is persisting bitterness over Bernie, theirs is deflection.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Gabriel Maxwell, post: 36209, member: 121"] Oh, I don't disagree with you at all. Of course it contributed to her loss. But that's their political error, which at the end of the day they are entitled to making. They shouldn't, for their own sake, but they can. Hacking from a foreign power and the FBI boss abusing his position however is something very different. It's malevolent interference. And Clinton may have won the elections despite the DNC's political errors, had there not been that malevolent interference. Of course, as the intelligence leadership already underlined, there is unfortunately no definitive way to gauge the extent to which Russian hacking and Comey's dishonorable actions swayed the voters, unless there was a way to re-run the elections in a parallel universe. Unless evidence comes to light that the Trump campaign colluded with the Russians prior to the elections, which would invalidate their victory and trigger a political scandal of Watergate magnitude. Even if that doesn't happen, I wouldn't mind if people kept pushing Trump's buttons calling him illegitimate and a fake president. Due to Trump's severe narcissistic personality disorder and complete lack of restraint when faced with even the mildest form of criticism, such repeated provocation could result in an embarrassing public meltdown episode. I certainly duly note all your criticism of Trump. But you do have a penchant for linking every discussion point to Hillary Clinton. Something you appear to share with Trump's paid shills, though for very different reasons. Yours is persisting bitterness over Bernie, theirs is deflection. [/QUOTE]

Verification

6 + 4 =