Menu
Forums
New posts
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Awards
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Forums
Speciality TV
Cult TV
Twin Peaks s3 - episode discussion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="James from London" data-source="post: 286978" data-attributes="member: 22"><p>Yes, they're immediately likeable in a laid-back, unassuming way, which is a tricky thing to pull off when they've also got to be confident enough to spend the next two hours delivering their unasked for opinions on something that has already been theorised to death.</p><p></p><p>I've started watching it in little ten minute chunks, and it's great. It's already reminded me of so much I'd forgotten.</p><p></p><p>All TV reunions, especially the '80s soap ones, have that story element of "getting the band back together", where something happens that brings all the characters back from wherever they've supposedly been since the original series ended so that the new story can now begin. On DALLAS, it was JR's fake funeral, on KNOTS it was (sort of*) Mack and Karen's surprise anniversary party, on DYNASTY it was (sort of*) the court hearing in New York. With TWIN PEAKS, the whole thing is about getting the band back together - it takes that long for Coop and Laura to find their way home again.</p><p></p><p>*Actually, like TWIN PEAKS, the real reunion on DYNASTY doesn't take place until the very end. Up until then, it's mostly about different combinations of characters in different cities in countries. I think that's one of the reasons it's my favourite of the three. And the real reunion on KNOTS already took place at the end of the original series when Val came back from the dead and Abby moved back to the cup-de-sac, which kind of renders the whole of BTCDS redundant. That's probably why it's my least favourite of the three.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="James from London, post: 286978, member: 22"] Yes, they're immediately likeable in a laid-back, unassuming way, which is a tricky thing to pull off when they've also got to be confident enough to spend the next two hours delivering their unasked for opinions on something that has already been theorised to death. I've started watching it in little ten minute chunks, and it's great. It's already reminded me of so much I'd forgotten. All TV reunions, especially the '80s soap ones, have that story element of "getting the band back together", where something happens that brings all the characters back from wherever they've supposedly been since the original series ended so that the new story can now begin. On DALLAS, it was JR's fake funeral, on KNOTS it was (sort of*) Mack and Karen's surprise anniversary party, on DYNASTY it was (sort of*) the court hearing in New York. With TWIN PEAKS, the whole thing is about getting the band back together - it takes that long for Coop and Laura to find their way home again. *Actually, like TWIN PEAKS, the real reunion on DYNASTY doesn't take place until the very end. Up until then, it's mostly about different combinations of characters in different cities in countries. I think that's one of the reasons it's my favourite of the three. And the real reunion on KNOTS already took place at the end of the original series when Val came back from the dead and Abby moved back to the cup-de-sac, which kind of renders the whole of BTCDS redundant. That's probably why it's my least favourite of the three. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who played Sue Ellen in Dallas?
Post reply
Forums
Speciality TV
Cult TV
Twin Peaks s3 - episode discussion
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top