Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Daniel Avery" data-source="post: 71313" data-attributes="member: 27">I recall a scene (back when Ron Carlivati was still the Head Writer) where Monica mentioned that she was going over to Lee and Gail&#039;s house to play cards, as if this was a standing date they had.&nbsp; Off-hand comments like that dropped into scenes are nice &quot;fan service&quot; and even though I wasn&#039;t watching back when Lee and Gail were on the show, I feel as if they are part of the series when the writers drop in such references.From the Liesl/Madeline conversations we saw a while back, we&#039;re pretty sure Nathan&#039;s dad was not Victor Cassadine, though this is the story Liesl tells everyone.&nbsp; So why don&#039;t they play up this &quot;Cassadine cousin&quot; thing, having him in scenes with fellow Cassadines like Alexis, Sam, and Spencer?&nbsp; Even stranger, you&#039;d think Valentin would have addressed the idea that his brother-in-law Nathan was also his nephew (since Victor and Valentin were half-brothers).&nbsp; If GH really wanted to throw a monkey-wrench into the works, we could discover that the reason Liesl was so desperate to keep Nathan&#039;s paternity a secret was because his father is in fact Mikkos Cassadine.&nbsp; Given what Helena did to women who had affairs with Mikkos, it&#039;s little wonder Liesl kept it under wraps.&nbsp; Of course, Liesl would have had to do the deed with ol&#039; Mikkos shortly before he died, since the timeline is totally wrong...but since when has that stopped them?&nbsp; Nathan would have just as much claim to the Cassadine fortune as Valentin, and we&#039;ve seen Valentin kill people who were in his way (Nikolas).&nbsp; Would he kill Nina&#039;s precious little brother, &#039;Jay&#039;?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Daniel Avery, post: 71313, member: 27"] I recall a scene (back when Ron Carlivati was still the Head Writer) where Monica mentioned that she was going over to Lee and Gail's house to play cards, as if this was a standing date they had. Off-hand comments like that dropped into scenes are nice "fan service" and even though I wasn't watching back when Lee and Gail were on the show, I feel as if they are part of the series when the writers drop in such references. From the Liesl/Madeline conversations we saw a while back, we're pretty sure Nathan's dad was [I]not[/I] Victor Cassadine, though this is the story Liesl tells everyone. So why don't they play up this "Cassadine cousin" thing, having him in scenes with fellow Cassadines like Alexis, Sam, and Spencer? Even stranger, you'd think Valentin would have addressed the idea that his brother-in-law Nathan was also his nephew (since Victor and Valentin were half-brothers). If GH really wanted to throw a monkey-wrench into the works, we could discover that the reason Liesl was so desperate to keep Nathan's paternity a secret was because his father is in fact [I]Mikkos[/I] Cassadine. Given what Helena did to women who had affairs with Mikkos, it's little wonder Liesl kept it under wraps. Of course, Liesl would have had to do the deed with ol' Mikkos shortly before he died, since the timeline is totally wrong...but since when has that stopped them? Nathan would have just as much claim to the Cassadine fortune as Valentin, and we've seen Valentin kill people who were in his way (Nikolas). Would he kill Nina's precious little brother, 'Jay'? [/QUOTE]

Verification

What month follows July?