Grande Dame Guignol

ClassyCo

Telly Talk Warrior
LV
5
 
Awards
11
WHATEVER HAPPENED TO BABY JANE is back in theaters this Sunday and next Wednesday. I'm going for the second showing.


View attachment 38238
I'd love to see BABY JANE on the big screen, but these screenings are always too far from my house, especially for them to be shown on weekdays. If they were screening them on the weekends, I might could squeeze a show in, but it's next-to-impossible for me to rearrange my schedule during the week.​
 

Toni

Maximum Member
LV
11
 
Awards
24
WHATEVER HAPPENED TO BABY JANE is back in theaters this Sunday and next Wednesday. I'm going for the second showing.


View attachment 38238

I hope it´s not a "Rocky Horror"-style showing (better take raticide with you!).

5v7w.gif
 

Toni

Maximum Member
LV
11
 
Awards
24
If it's not, I'm going to feel a bit foolish when I show up in full Baby Jane drag.

time-to-pretty-up-lipstick.gif

There´s nothing that good makeup can´t fix...​
 

Snarky Oracle!

Telly Talk Supreme
LV
8
 
Awards
21
Awe man! I was counting on you guys to tell me how it went because I couldn't go. :oops:​

Thanks to @Crimson and @ClassyCo. for tipping me off to the movie. I rushed over to the metroplex and found that of the three overfed, caucasian inversion neckbeard late-boomers who still reside in my county, two were apparently out sick.

I was alone in the theatre -- not one other audience member accompanied me.

To be fair to BABT JANE -- and the neighborhood -- the temperature was literally 100 degrees F and there was a major cloudburst in less than an hour prior to showtime... and the cavernous 24-screen complex was almost devoid of customers.

Worse, with few people in attendance to any of the movies, they shut down the air-conditioning midway thru the picture and I was sweltering by the time it wrapped up.

Oh, and the print was certainly clean but not quite as pristine as I'd hoped -- but that could have been the projection equipment.

And I'd never noticed the "C U Next Tuesday" line between Bette and their maid until now.. which is astounding, since I've owned a copy of BABY JANE for 35 years.

whateverhappenedtobabyjane.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Crimson

Telly Talk Enthusiast
LV
2
 
Awards
9
I did indeed go to see JANE on the big screen and I'm glad I did; it's likely a once-in-a-lifetime chance.

I've seen JANE so many times, it's nearly impossible for me to really see it; my memories and expectations trump the actual act of watching. The great thing about seeing classics in the theater is that it's like seeing the film for the first time, and I find myself with a renewed appreciation for just how great this film is.

Its plot and horror elements are pretty meager, but the film's emotional resonance is surprisingly rich, filled with regrets, resentments and recriminations. Even the film's revelations aren't so much plot twists as emotional twists: Blanche was the villain all along.

Seeing it on the big screen also showed what an excellently directed film this is; this is no shoddy B-picture, but a film with gorgeous, stark cinematography and inventive screen composition. The print wasn't quite pristine, but it was crisp and clear.

Of course, the film is all about the two lead actresses and they give two of the screen's great performances. It's easy to focus on the flamboyance of Bette's acting, but she gave a layered, nuanced performance. She knew when to go big, but also when to reel it in. Crawford's performance is often unjustly overlooked. She's every bit as great as Davis; I guess it's too easy to mistake a tightly controlled performance of quite desperation as a lack of acting. And if nothing else, she gets credit for managing to look haggard and beautiful at the same time; no easy feat.

I'll cross my fingers that HUSH ... HUSH SWEET CHARLOTTE will get its own 60 year anniversary release, although I suspect that film's lesser renown will prevent that.
 

Snarky Oracle!

Telly Talk Supreme
LV
8
 
Awards
21
I'll cross my fingers that HUSH ... HUSH SWEET CHARLOTTE will get its own 60 year anniversary release, although I suspect that film's lesser renown will prevent that.

Oh, I know, I know. My thoughts exactly. CHARLOTTE is the superior film, and has even more Oscar noms, but those dark-hearted Crawford fans have convinced everybody that it's a cheap rip-off... I'm not expecting to see it re-released in two years in the theatres -- if it was, it would be like my life coming full-circle in a fashion.

b12e089c4e2b9b2fb675c29545c2363a.jpg
 

ClassyCo

Telly Talk Warrior
LV
5
 
Awards
11
Does anyone have any ideas for potential Grande Dame Guignol films you'd like to share? Much earlier in this discussion Snarky shared some of his ideas -- such as a story called HORNET'S NEST, where Crawford played a pair of good vs. evil identical twins.

What ideas do you wish could've been done back in the '60s or '70s when this sub-genre was at its peak?
 

Snarky Oracle!

Telly Talk Supreme
LV
8
 
Awards
21
Does anyone have any ideas for potential Grande Dame Guignol films you'd like to share? Much earlier in this discussion Snarky shared some of his ideas -- such as a story called HORNET'S NEST, where Crawford played a pair of good vs. evil identical twins.

What ideas do you wish could've been done back in the '60s or '70s when this sub-genre was at its peak?

In lurid Halloween-ish 1966/67 color, probably in London and possibly from Hammer Films...

I just see it -- the evil Crawford with a vicious beehive hairdo and the benign clairvoyant Crawford with long cascading hair who eventually overcomes her wicked sister, the holy Crawford watching in mock-horror as a fire consumes the nasty sister's Victorian mansion as evil Joan is attacked -- strangled and stabbed -- by a vengeful giant hydra plant she been growing and abusing for years.

I like to think it exists out there somewhere.

The grande-dame-guignol (psycho-biddy/hagsploitation) genre could have easily been one of my favorites, except that most of them just simply weren't very good -- what used to be called unaffectionately "drive-in" movies... Yes, the potential was great, like the four Bette did in the mid-'60s, but most of the others were far too crap to have any fondness for them collectively.-

I mean, who doesn't love a middle-aged maniacal mama with a blunt instrument or an ice pick or something, living in her gothic domicile and may or may not have eradicated somebody in the past or the present?? I mean, it's absolutely primal for many -- if not most -- of us.

But this sub-genre was seized upon, rather predictably, by third-rate filmmakers in the wake of BABY JANE's success, so a poorly-edited Slutty-Grandma-with-a-Blowtorch** was about as good as we were ever going to get... Which, perhaps anticipating this, is why Bette said circa 1965 that the horror genre had been good to her in the previous couple of years "but I want out," and she indeed should never have returned to them as she later did.

I also think the era has a lot to do with it... You need a valid diva (ideally one with a Scorpio Rising), past her cinematic prime, to head these pictures, and they were still around in the '60s and now are long gone... Who would do them now -- Jane Fonda? Helen Mirren? Those actresses would probably be okay, but it just wouldn't be the same.

Also, the angsty tension endemic to the '60s, where the century appears to divide and you have the sacred pre-apocalyptic doom of the first half of the '60s and post-apocalyptic hellscape of the last half of the decade in stark contrast to one another as everyone appears to be looking into the Face of Eternity...... well, isn't that combination a little difficult to reproduce in the present?

Even when they still had those things in the '60s, most of the entries kinda sucked.

Besides, HUSH ... HUSH, SWEET CHARLOTTE perfected the genre and, in my mind, can't really be surpassed. As Judith Crist, one of the '60s more objective critics observed, with CHARLOTTE "the guignol is about as grand as it gets."

Bette-Davis-Olivia-de-Havilland-Hush-Hush-Sweet-Charlotte-1964.jpg
1657056397646.png

** Slutty-Grandma-with-a-Blowtorch, both title and concept -- and all related intellectual property -- is copyrighted by tellytalk.net and Snarky Oracle -- so you just turn and walk away, Lee Daniels!

That settled, Diana Ross is a possibility.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Snarky Oracle!

Telly Talk Supreme
LV
8
 
Awards
21
What idas do you wish could've been done back in the '60s or '70s when this sub-genre was at its peak?

I also want to see some B&W picture with Gloria Swanson, Dame Judith Anderson, Miriam Hopkins -- and, maybe, someone like Ruth Roman -- sisters (more or less) living together in a darkened mansion... old mysteries, ancient conflicts, great dialogue, black shadows.

I'd also throw in Tallulah Bankhead, but she did DIE! DIE! MY DARLING, so she'd already had her entry

I don't even have a detailed story for it necessarily. :lol:

Smells like 1964.

1657075909775.png1657076067960.png1657076180255.png1657076225424.png

Needs a Twilight Zone-y title, doesn't it?

4584468.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Crimson

Telly Talk Enthusiast
LV
2
 
Awards
9
If we're going to engage in 'what if ...?' fantasy about the genre, we should start with just wishing that the existing films were better. If STRAIT-JACKET wasn't so dully inept and DIE! DIE! MY DARLING! was a bit less pallid (and preferably in B&W), the genre as a whole would have been strengthened by a few more superior entries.

After that, the big question to me is: which actresses of that era would have been suited to the genre. Hepburn, of course, would never have sullied herself and others of that era (Colbert; Loy) expressed contempt for the genre. The most obviously missing involvement was Stanwyck. I know she has her own William Castle film (which I haven't seen), but it's clearly not of the BABY JANE ilk. Stanwyck paired with Crawford or Davis -- or, heck, maybe all three in the same film! -- engaged in some guignol shenanigans could have been prime hagsploitation.

But my one big wish is that Serling, Spielberg and Crawford had extended their episode of NIGHT GALLERY to feature length; if Joan had been able to sustain that performance, I think it would have obliterated the rest of the genre.

Who would do them now -- Jane Fonda? Helen Mirren? Those actresses would probably be okay, but it just wouldn't be the same.

Jessica Lange, with her old Hollywood floridness, seems the best suited. Of course, she's already dabbled in the genre, with the late-entry and somewhat lackluster HUSH (1998); although the film was at least evocatively titled to be reminiscent of the best film in the genre.
 

Snarky Oracle!

Telly Talk Supreme
LV
8
 
Awards
21
If we're going to engage in 'what if ...?' fantasy about the genre, we should start with just wishing that the existing films were better. If STRAIT-JACKET wasn't so dully inept and DIE! DIE! MY DARLING! was a bit less pallid (and preferably in B&W), the genre as a whole would have been strengthened by a few more superior entries.

Oh, yes. If only the existing ones were better. STRAIT-JACKET is a film I always compulsively re-direct in my head whenever I see it -- so close and yet so far from what it is. Among other things, Arthur Arling's camerawork is crap. But the movie's so tacky it looks like audition footage that went wrong.

Oddly enough, I like the color scheme of DDMD, so it's one of the few of this genre I actually preferred not be in B&W... It gets fairly tired, though, after Miss Powers is locked in the attic.

After that, the big question to me is: which actresses of that era would have been suited to the genre. Hepburn, of course, would never have sullied herself and others of that era (Colbert; Loy) expressed contempt for the genre. The most obviously missing involvement was Stanwyck. I know she has her own William Castle film (which I haven't seen), but it's clearly not of the BABY JANE ilk. Stanwyck paired with Crawford or Davis -- or, heck, maybe all three in the same film! -- engaged in some guignol shenanigans could have been prime hagsploitation.

Stanwyck's is THE NIGHT WALKER, which features a creepy Vic Mizzy score admired by even Hitchcock's Bernard Herrmann. The movie goes bad fast, just after the first explosion.

The intriguing prologue was obviously complied by somebody other than William Castle:


But my one big wish is that Serling, Spielberg and Crawford had extended their episode of NIGHT GALLERY to feature length; if Joan had been able to sustain that performance, I think it would have obliterated the rest of the genre.
.
Agreed, my thoughts exactly. Even Crawford said it was her favorite horror venture behind only BABY JANE. . Spielberg never knew Mommie Dearest tried to fire him until after she died years later. i

Jessica Lange, with her old Hollywood floridness, seems the best suited.

Meh. Her turn as Crawford in FEUD failed to enthuse me. And HUSH didn't work for me either (I recall BUFFY's "Hush" was more effective).
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Crimson

Telly Talk Enthusiast
LV
2
 
Awards
9
Oddly enough, I like the color scheme of DDMD, so it's one of the few of this genre I actually preferred not be in B&W.

As a general rule, I don't care for classic horror in color. The horror aspects of these films tend to be, in retrospect, rather tepid; being in color, to me, just undermines their effectiveness. I've never been able to get into the Hammer films; for all their vaunted sex (well, corseted bosoms) and blood, they feel bloodless to me.

There's one major exception, a stray thought that led me down an interesting path of pondering: rather than linking with the inept William Castle, it's a shame that Joan didn't find herself working with Roger Corman instead. I don't think AIP dabbled in psycho-biddy films, but they could have. If Corman had brought his ghoulish, garish style to a BABY JANE knockoff, I think he could have pulled it off better than any of the other imitators.
 

Snarky Oracle!

Telly Talk Supreme
LV
8
 
Awards
21
LADY IN A CAGE (1964) with Olivia de Havilland and the recently defunct James Caan; it's a mildly interesting meltdown-of-the-inner-cities-in-the-mid-'60s entry, a film attempting to be edgy and shocking and perversely "real" in the way some pictures were doing from around '63/'64 onward.

I like the movie a little bit, and find its "distasteful" elements well within the realm of cinematic acceptability (the dead dog hit by a car at the beginning, and Caan's head squished under a tire at the end were nice touches). My main issue is that the film starts to drag as all these held-captive-against-their-wishes entries (like DIE! DIE! MY DARLING and even WHAT EVER HAPPENED TO BABY JANE? tend to do.

Olivia hesitated to replace Crawford in HUSH ... HUSH, SWEET CHARLOTTE because of the somewhat down-market results of LADY IN A CAGE. But I think her performance as the denial-ridden, overbearing mother whose excessive affection and French parfum turned her son gay and, hence, suicidal was impressively reprehensible and yet sympathetic.

f2021b55194d95f1bcf4467ab203655d--olivia-de-havilland-the-cage.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:

ClassyCo

Telly Talk Warrior
LV
5
 
Awards
11
I watched LADY IN A CAGE sometime ago when it was available for streaming on Hulu (it might still be there, but I haven't looked). As indifferent as I can be towards Olivia, I thought her performance was solid and I liked the "novelty" of her being trapped inside a small in-house elevator. James Caan, as I've said, was also good in the movie, and so was the hopelessly underrated Ann Sothern. One wonders why Sothern wasn't lured back to do more of these hagsploitation-type vehicles. Perhaps she was still too glamorous to have a lead in the genre, though I could easily picture her playing some former glamour puss whose life has fallen to pieces around her. But isn't that what most of these movies are about anyway?

LADY IN A CAGE is a decent movie, probably in my Top 5 favorites within the Grande Dame Guignol sub-genre (considering the ones I've seen so far). I'd agree that it does get a little long-winded. A good 25 minutes or better could've been shaved off the run-time, and the impact might've been a little stronger.

Still, the performances are quite good, especially considering what the script requires.

1657310071738.png

Roger Corman
He was producing a lot of horror films for Vincent Price in the early-'60s, so I'm sure he'd do Grande Dame Guignol correctly. It would've been great had it at least given it a shot.
 

Willie Oleson

Telly Talk Schemer
LV
9
 
Awards
27
What is it about the 1960s and 70s hunks that makes their sex appeal so intense? Even the psychopaths (or especially the psychopaths?)
 

Snarky Oracle!

Telly Talk Supreme
LV
8
 
Awards
21
I'm not sure if this is the right thread to post this in, but here goes WHAT EVER HAPPENED TO GOOD TASTE...?


... I don't think I'll ever adjust to the word "queer" -- it's just regressive.
 
Top