Menu
Forums
New posts
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Awards
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Forums
Global Telly Talk
General TV
ABC Cancels Roseanne In Response To Racist Tweet About Valerie Jarrett
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Gabriel Maxwell" data-source="post: 122178" data-attributes="member: 121"><p>Why doesn't ABC just let it go?</p><p></p><p>First of all, who wants to watch DARLENE or THE CONNERS? Roseanne <em><strong>was</strong></em> the show. The remaining cast were there to play off her sarcastic lines. Think of Roseanne what you want, but it'd be a dull ROSEANNE without Roseanne. It would fizzle out quickly after some initial interest.</p><p></p><p>Secondly, she's co-producer, so she's likely entitled to a share of the profits. And if they try to screw her over, she can sue them like Charlie Sheen successfully sued CBS who then had to settle for millions of dollars. Not much of a punishment if she ends up profiting from additional episodes without even lifting a finger.</p><p></p><p>But I suppose they want to get some of the money back, since Gilbert, Goodman & Metcalf are reportedly still getting paid $300,000 per episode next season whether ABC produces a 2nd season or not, so they're probably thinking - well, we might as well give it a shot, since we're losing buckets of money on this anyway.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Gabriel Maxwell, post: 122178, member: 121"] Why doesn't ABC just let it go? First of all, who wants to watch DARLENE or THE CONNERS? Roseanne [I][B]was[/B][/I] the show. The remaining cast were there to play off her sarcastic lines. Think of Roseanne what you want, but it'd be a dull ROSEANNE without Roseanne. It would fizzle out quickly after some initial interest. Secondly, she's co-producer, so she's likely entitled to a share of the profits. And if they try to screw her over, she can sue them like Charlie Sheen successfully sued CBS who then had to settle for millions of dollars. Not much of a punishment if she ends up profiting from additional episodes without even lifting a finger. But I suppose they want to get some of the money back, since Gilbert, Goodman & Metcalf are reportedly still getting paid $300,000 per episode next season whether ABC produces a 2nd season or not, so they're probably thinking - well, we might as well give it a shot, since we're losing buckets of money on this anyway. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who played Sue Ellen in Dallas?
Post reply
Forums
Global Telly Talk
General TV
ABC Cancels Roseanne In Response To Racist Tweet About Valerie Jarrett
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top