Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Willie Oleson" data-source="post: 443055" data-attributes="member: 8">Wasn&#039;t cancel culture the negative side effect of the MeToo movement?It&#039;s possible that that negative side effect was hijacked by the same people who hijacked the Woke movement, the self-imposed spokespersons who became the public face and voice of the various marginalised groups despite the fact that nobody has asked for it. The incredible damage caused by these people has even reached the sensibilities of the most progressive countries in Europe.It&#039;s when politics is taken over by an endless stream of intentionally controversial, sexy-newsworthy social media garbage. The celebrity cunts in their big mansions who always appear in the morning shows and podcasts, thinking they can speak for the man/woman/transexual on the street.Nevertheless, regardless of how it all came about, a gender politics-friendly government is in itself not a real problem as long as it doesn&#039;t happen at the expense of bigger issues that affect all&nbsp; people. You need a strong foundation to fine-tune certain issues, you can&#039;t build castles on quicksand, and in that regard it&#039;s not difficult to imagine that many people including former Democrates are hoodwinked into thinking that Trump is the most sensible choice.But if it&#039;s true that the faith in the Democratic Party has reached an all-time low then they are actually in a perfect position to make a positive comeback.To stop being tone-deaf is a good start, to stop handing over ammunition to the opposition who, of course, will use it for their hate &amp; fear campaigns would be even better. Politics is not rocket science, and any politician with half a braincell should understand that the word &quot;woke&quot; has been tarnished beyond repair.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Willie Oleson, post: 443055, member: 8"] Wasn't cancel culture the negative side effect of the MeToo movement? It's possible that that negative side effect was hijacked by the same people who hijacked the Woke movement, the self-imposed spokespersons who became the public face and voice of the various marginalised groups despite the fact that [B]nobody has asked for it[/B]. The incredible damage caused by these people has even reached the sensibilities of the most progressive countries in Europe. It's when politics is taken over by an endless stream of intentionally controversial, sexy-newsworthy social media garbage. The celebrity cunts in their big mansions who always appear in the morning shows and podcasts, thinking they can speak for the man/woman/transexual on the street. Nevertheless, regardless of how it all came about, a gender politics-friendly government is in itself not a real problem as long as it doesn't happen at the expense of bigger issues that affect [I]all[/I] people. You need a strong foundation to fine-tune certain issues, you can't build castles on quicksand, and in that regard it's not difficult to imagine that many people including former Democrates are hoodwinked into thinking that Trump is the most sensible choice. But if it's true that the faith in the Democratic Party has reached an all-time low then they are actually in a perfect position to make a positive comeback. To stop being tone-deaf is a good start, to stop handing over ammunition to the opposition who, [I][B]of course[/B][/I], will use it for their hate & fear campaigns would be even better. Politics is not rocket science, and any politician with half a braincell should understand that the word "woke" has been tarnished beyond repair. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Who played JR Ewing?