Forums
New posts
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Awards
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
A little forum update...We're planning an upgrade.
Find out more about what's planned and how you can help support the forum
Click here for the details
Forums
Dynasty
The Colbys
Could this show have made it without the ajef fallon connections which is basically just a milessized ploohole
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Grant Jennings" data-source="post: 262794" data-attributes="member: 746"><p>Network executives like spin-offs because they believe it gives a new show a built-in audience which is why we also have backdoor pilots* (if you've seen the gawdawful Rita Moreno episode of <em>The Golden Girls </em>or the Ken Berry episode of <em>The Brady Bunch </em> you know what a backdoor pilot is). <em>Knots Landing</em> didn't have to be a <em>Dallas </em>spin-off, David Jacobs created it before he created the Ewing family, but the Lorimar and CBS executives wanted a <em>Dallas </em>spin-off so that's what it became. </p><p></p><p>I find it ironic that Jeff and Fallon are the spin-off characters on <em>The Colbys , </em>as such they were expected to be the characters with the strongest initial appeal to the audience yet, to me at least, they were often the least interesting characters on the show. It may have worked better if Pamela Sue Martin had returned but I'm not so sure of that as the writers on both <em>Dynasty </em>and <em>The Colbys </em> were writing Fallon as the resident victim. On <em>The Colbys </em>Fallon was Kirby 2.0. As John James noted, spinning the characters off to the domain of the Colby family changed the dynamic of their relationship making Jeff the "alpha" when it had been Fallon when they were on <em>Dynasty.</em></p><p></p><p>Spinning Dominique over from time to time made sense both plot-wise (of course her record company would be based in Los Angeles) and ratings-wise (wouldn't you want one of your "name" stars to appear in the new show?). In hindsight, I think a spin-off that focused more on Dominique (perhaps without Jeff and Fallon) makes more sense. The <em>Dynasty </em>writers didn't seem to know what to do with the character (though one could argue that could easily be said of almost any character) and Diahann Carroll as the star would have strong appeal for African American viewers. I think if instead of Garrett, they had introduced Nick/Richard Lawson and had the Dominique & Nick love story as one of the new show's initial plots it would have been "appointment television" for many African American viewers.</p><p></p><p>* "Backdoor pilot" is one of those phrases, like "pulled pork" that isn't dirty but makes me blush because it sure sounds like it is.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Grant Jennings, post: 262794, member: 746"] Network executives like spin-offs because they believe it gives a new show a built-in audience which is why we also have backdoor pilots* (if you've seen the gawdawful Rita Moreno episode of [I]The Golden Girls [/I]or the Ken Berry episode of [I]The Brady Bunch [/I] you know what a backdoor pilot is). [I]Knots Landing[/I] didn't have to be a [I]Dallas [/I]spin-off, David Jacobs created it before he created the Ewing family, but the Lorimar and CBS executives wanted a [I]Dallas [/I]spin-off so that's what it became. I find it ironic that Jeff and Fallon are the spin-off characters on [I]The Colbys , [/I]as such they were expected to be the characters with the strongest initial appeal to the audience yet, to me at least, they were often the least interesting characters on the show. It may have worked better if Pamela Sue Martin had returned but I'm not so sure of that as the writers on both [I]Dynasty [/I]and [I]The Colbys [/I] were writing Fallon as the resident victim. On [I]The Colbys [/I]Fallon was Kirby 2.0. As John James noted, spinning the characters off to the domain of the Colby family changed the dynamic of their relationship making Jeff the "alpha" when it had been Fallon when they were on [I]Dynasty.[/I] Spinning Dominique over from time to time made sense both plot-wise (of course her record company would be based in Los Angeles) and ratings-wise (wouldn't you want one of your "name" stars to appear in the new show?). In hindsight, I think a spin-off that focused more on Dominique (perhaps without Jeff and Fallon) makes more sense. The [I]Dynasty [/I]writers didn't seem to know what to do with the character (though one could argue that could easily be said of almost any character) and Diahann Carroll as the star would have strong appeal for African American viewers. I think if instead of Garrett, they had introduced Nick/Richard Lawson and had the Dominique & Nick love story as one of the new show's initial plots it would have been "appointment television" for many African American viewers. * "Backdoor pilot" is one of those phrases, like "pulled pork" that isn't dirty but makes me blush because it sure sounds like it is. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
6 + 4 =
Post reply
Forums
Dynasty
The Colbys
Could this show have made it without the ajef fallon connections which is basically just a milessized ploohole
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top