Menu
Forums
New posts
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Awards
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Forums
Dynasty
Dynasty
DYNASTY versus DALLAS versus KNOTS LANDING versus the rest of them
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Willie Oleson" data-source="post: 440493" data-attributes="member: 8"><p>Oh yes, it all looks very contrived and all the characters take the bait to make those schemes feasible.</p><p>But the reason it looks that way - and why it usually <em>doesn't</em> in Dynasty - is that Dallas always completed those schemes and storylines, sometimes with satisfying results, sometimes not.</p><p>Perhaps that explains a part of the Great Leslie Stewart Mystery - it didn't work out fabulously but they didn't realise that until that story arc was completed.</p><p>Everything else in that storyline was fine, just not for her. But that's still preferable to nipping story developments in the bud because the outcome might be uncertain.</p><p>If Dallas was the lesser soap then it was because the writers were more committed than the Dynasty writers.</p><p>Knots Landing, often touted as the most "grounded" soap, actually had the most outlandish storylines and often with very surprising results. Falcon Crest was a little too spectacular for its own good and they thought they could defy all the soap rules.</p><p>No matter how ridiculous it looks, it is a rule that all the Ewings live at Southfork. It's always more effective to be dramatic when you have an audience aka the precious family.</p><p>Dallas and Dynasty always looked their very worst-best when it looked awkward, those characters who were supposed to be above reproach. Sammy Jo knew it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Willie Oleson, post: 440493, member: 8"] Oh yes, it all looks very contrived and all the characters take the bait to make those schemes feasible. But the reason it looks that way - and why it usually [I]doesn't[/I] in Dynasty - is that Dallas always completed those schemes and storylines, sometimes with satisfying results, sometimes not. Perhaps that explains a part of the Great Leslie Stewart Mystery - it didn't work out fabulously but they didn't realise that until that story arc was completed. Everything else in that storyline was fine, just not for her. But that's still preferable to nipping story developments in the bud because the outcome might be uncertain. If Dallas was the lesser soap then it was because the writers were more committed than the Dynasty writers. Knots Landing, often touted as the most "grounded" soap, actually had the most outlandish storylines and often with very surprising results. Falcon Crest was a little too spectacular for its own good and they thought they could defy all the soap rules. No matter how ridiculous it looks, it is a rule that all the Ewings live at Southfork. It's always more effective to be dramatic when you have an audience aka the precious family. Dallas and Dynasty always looked their very worst-best when it looked awkward, those characters who were supposed to be above reproach. Sammy Jo knew it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
6 + 4 =
Post reply
Forums
Dynasty
Dynasty
DYNASTY versus DALLAS versus KNOTS LANDING versus the rest of them
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top