Menu
Forums
New posts
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Awards
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Forums
Dynasty
Dynasty
DYNASTY versus DALLAS versus KNOTS LANDING versus the rest of them
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="James from London" data-source="post: 440543" data-attributes="member: 22"><p>I've been thinking about this quite a bit. It reminds me of this quote from Ted Shackelford ...</p><p></p><p><em>"The thing with being on a series that runs that long is that the writers run out of things to do. What happens if you’re the guy who’s been on the show ten years and is highly paid but they have nothing for you to do, is that they bring in other people, and you become a supporting character to those people." </em></p><p></p><p>... which sounds kind of a negative thing, but thinking about it now, it's the outsiders -- Matthew and Claudia, Mickey Trotter, the Ramoses, Joshua, Ciji, Peter Hollister and Jill Bennett -- who are driven mad and/or corrupted and/or destroyed through their dealings with the main cast that often produce the most potent and poignant Soap Land moments. And they mostly tend to start off as more ordinary and relatable to the viewer than the regulars (i.e., not rich) -- the "us" to the more glamorous characters' "them". So maybe their fates are what would also happen to <em>us</em> if we were to dare enter the walls of Soap Land. And <em>maybe</em> that's why some viewers are resistant to them, cos they'd rather imagine themselves as Joan Collins or Krystle than Lindsay Blaisdel or Tommy Ortega.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="James from London, post: 440543, member: 22"] I've been thinking about this quite a bit. It reminds me of this quote from Ted Shackelford ... [I]"The thing with being on a series that runs that long is that the writers run out of things to do. What happens if you’re the guy who’s been on the show ten years and is highly paid but they have nothing for you to do, is that they bring in other people, and you become a supporting character to those people." [/I] ... which sounds kind of a negative thing, but thinking about it now, it's the outsiders -- Matthew and Claudia, Mickey Trotter, the Ramoses, Joshua, Ciji, Peter Hollister and Jill Bennett -- who are driven mad and/or corrupted and/or destroyed through their dealings with the main cast that often produce the most potent and poignant Soap Land moments. And they mostly tend to start off as more ordinary and relatable to the viewer than the regulars (i.e., not rich) -- the "us" to the more glamorous characters' "them". So maybe their fates are what would also happen to [I]us[/I] if we were to dare enter the walls of Soap Land. And [I]maybe[/I] that's why some viewers are resistant to them, cos they'd rather imagine themselves as Joan Collins or Krystle than Lindsay Blaisdel or Tommy Ortega. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who played Sue Ellen in Dallas?
Post reply
Forums
Dynasty
Dynasty
DYNASTY versus DALLAS versus KNOTS LANDING versus the rest of them
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top