Forums
New posts
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Awards
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Poison your name this Hallowe'en
There's plenty of time to choose your spooky October username
Click here for more details
Forums
Dynasty
Dynasty
How David Jacobs Would Have Saved Dynasty
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Rove" data-source="post: 445233" data-attributes="member: 100"><p>In part I agree with Esther how the women on Dallas were written sometimes however when I compare the female characters on both shows I'd argue the ladies on Dallas were written with depth and offered material that viewers could relate to. The female characters on Dynasty were one dimensional and only intended to wear furs, jewels and throw shade at each other...which becomes repetitive.</p><p></p><p>The very character which put Dynasty on the world map was Alexis and her introduction was a masterstroke but instead of delving deeper into her background and her hatred of Blake the writers quickly married her off to Cecil so she could be on a level playing field with Blake...and afford those furs, jewels and trade barbs with Krystle.</p><p></p><p>David Jacobs is correct when he refers to Dynasty as having too much clutter however I'd argue where Dynasty lost me was the recast of the Carrington children...horrible.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Rove, post: 445233, member: 100"] In part I agree with Esther how the women on Dallas were written sometimes however when I compare the female characters on both shows I'd argue the ladies on Dallas were written with depth and offered material that viewers could relate to. The female characters on Dynasty were one dimensional and only intended to wear furs, jewels and throw shade at each other...which becomes repetitive. The very character which put Dynasty on the world map was Alexis and her introduction was a masterstroke but instead of delving deeper into her background and her hatred of Blake the writers quickly married her off to Cecil so she could be on a level playing field with Blake...and afford those furs, jewels and trade barbs with Krystle. David Jacobs is correct when he refers to Dynasty as having too much clutter however I'd argue where Dynasty lost me was the recast of the Carrington children...horrible. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
6 + 4 =
Post reply
Forums
Dynasty
Dynasty
How David Jacobs Would Have Saved Dynasty
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
