Menu
Forums
New posts
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Awards
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Forums
Entertainment
Screen Icons
Joan Crawford: Not the Girl-Next-Door
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Crimson" data-source="post: 372495" data-attributes="member: 5079"><p>Tonight, I watched AUTUMN LEAVES (1956) for the first time. I was looking for a movie to usher in the fall season; come to find out the movie the movie isn't even (noticeably) set during autumn. I've never bothered with this one before because I assumed it was Joan's take on those mid-50s<em> Kate Hepburn as a spinster finding love at last</em> films. (I hate those.) I guess it kind of is but, as a Crawford film, much more luridly melodramatic. </p><p></p><p>Even still, I didn't care for it very much. All the pieces are there, but they don't add up. I think think the film would have fared better if it had been made a few years earlier, during Joan's gutsier Warners-era. Being a Columbia feature probably didn't help; that studio tended towards the second rate. Mostly, though, I just don't care for Crawford when she was in her Loretta Young mode -- all wide eyed and fluttery. Except for calling Vera Miles a slut, none of Joan's hard-edged attitude from '45 to '52 is in evidence here.</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]47709[/ATTACH]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Crimson, post: 372495, member: 5079"] Tonight, I watched AUTUMN LEAVES (1956) for the first time. I was looking for a movie to usher in the fall season; come to find out the movie the movie isn't even (noticeably) set during autumn. I've never bothered with this one before because I assumed it was Joan's take on those mid-50s[I] Kate Hepburn as a spinster finding love at last[/I] films. (I hate those.) I guess it kind of is but, as a Crawford film, much more luridly melodramatic. Even still, I didn't care for it very much. All the pieces are there, but they don't add up. I think think the film would have fared better if it had been made a few years earlier, during Joan's gutsier Warners-era. Being a Columbia feature probably didn't help; that studio tended towards the second rate. Mostly, though, I just don't care for Crawford when she was in her Loretta Young mode -- all wide eyed and fluttery. Except for calling Vera Miles a slut, none of Joan's hard-edged attitude from '45 to '52 is in evidence here. [ATTACH type="full"]47709[/ATTACH] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who played JR Ewing?
Post reply
Forums
Entertainment
Screen Icons
Joan Crawford: Not the Girl-Next-Door
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top