Forums
New posts
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Awards
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Dynasty
Dynasty
Let's talk about Linda Evans' acting
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Snarky Oracle!" data-source="post: 363624" data-attributes="member: 57984"><p>What the producers didn't understand about Krystle and DYNASTY, at least once the flashier Alexis showed up: so goes Krystle, so goes DYNASTY.</p><p></p><p>The brass -- especially Eilleen Pollock -- admitted that they found Krystle "boring" and that they had a hard time writing for Krystle... That should <strong>never </strong>have happened. They should have focused on Krystle's strength and intelligence, but they did neither. And Linda's pleas for them to do so were rebuffed, apparently over their concern that it "just wasn't Krystle."</p><p></p><p>If they'd portrayed Krystle as being as competent -- and as relaxed -- as she was in the first couple of years (before the writing for her went south and the static acting directive was implemented) the whole show could have been salvaged.</p><p></p><p>But since they didn't, the A-V malformation became (mostly after the fact) what DYNASTY was relegated into being all about. And thank goodness for it.</p><p></p><p>At the end of the day, Alexis' clothes, Krystle brain gizmo which forced her to morph into Rita's double, and Lady Ashley's mind-bogglingly affected diction and stunningly unnatural gestures, came to define what DYNASTY was at its core.</p><p></p><p>Isn't that weird?</p><p></p><p></p><p><img src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_2UUIQKOFdH4/TKyi7yVWMoI/AAAAAAAAAJs/jMEfOatGvIE/s1600/alexis.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="width: 709px" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Snarky Oracle!, post: 363624, member: 57984"] What the producers didn't understand about Krystle and DYNASTY, at least once the flashier Alexis showed up: so goes Krystle, so goes DYNASTY. The brass -- especially Eilleen Pollock -- admitted that they found Krystle "boring" and that they had a hard time writing for Krystle... That should [B]never [/B]have happened. They should have focused on Krystle's strength and intelligence, but they did neither. And Linda's pleas for them to do so were rebuffed, apparently over their concern that it "just wasn't Krystle." If they'd portrayed Krystle as being as competent -- and as relaxed -- as she was in the first couple of years (before the writing for her went south and the static acting directive was implemented) the whole show could have been salvaged. But since they didn't, the A-V malformation became (mostly after the fact) what DYNASTY was relegated into being all about. And thank goodness for it. At the end of the day, Alexis' clothes, Krystle brain gizmo which forced her to morph into Rita's double, and Lady Ashley's mind-bogglingly affected diction and stunningly unnatural gestures, came to define what DYNASTY was at its core. Isn't that weird? [IMG width="709px"]http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_2UUIQKOFdH4/TKyi7yVWMoI/AAAAAAAAAJs/jMEfOatGvIE/s1600/alexis.jpg[/IMG] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who played JR Ewing?
Post reply
Forums
Dynasty
Dynasty
Let's talk about Linda Evans' acting
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top