Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Awards
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Festive Names
Do you want to change your name to something festive ?
Click here for more details
Forums
Global Telly Talk
Classic US TV
Mary Tyler Moore Show and Its Spin-Offs
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Crimson" data-source="post: 410976" data-attributes="member: 5079"><p>I imagine there was intention with that casting choice. Vivian had been the sitcom princess of the 50s and 60s, supporting Lucy; Valerie took over in that role in the 70s, supporting that decade's new sitcom queen. Unlike Valerie, though, Vivian never found her own solo stardom. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I think it was a combination of wanting to avoid Norman Lear territory -- and just dodge even the slightest question of race -- and, after Sue Ann, the producers never committed to a new ongoing character. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]54525[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The writers were also hampered by evolving mores of TV by the mid-70s. There had been a strong pushback among social conservatives against the bold topics of the early 70s TV; the RHODA writers felt they were limited in honestly addressing matters of marriage and sex. They just didn't seem to know how to write the marriage from any perspective.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Crimson, post: 410976, member: 5079"] I imagine there was intention with that casting choice. Vivian had been the sitcom princess of the 50s and 60s, supporting Lucy; Valerie took over in that role in the 70s, supporting that decade's new sitcom queen. Unlike Valerie, though, Vivian never found her own solo stardom. I think it was a combination of wanting to avoid Norman Lear territory -- and just dodge even the slightest question of race -- and, after Sue Ann, the producers never committed to a new ongoing character. [ATTACH type="full" width="100px"]54525[/ATTACH] The writers were also hampered by evolving mores of TV by the mid-70s. There had been a strong pushback among social conservatives against the bold topics of the early 70s TV; the RHODA writers felt they were limited in honestly addressing matters of marriage and sex. They just didn't seem to know how to write the marriage from any perspective. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
6 + 4 =
Post reply
Forums
Global Telly Talk
Classic US TV
Mary Tyler Moore Show and Its Spin-Offs
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top