Menu
Forums
New posts
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Awards
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Forums
News & Politics
US Politics
#metoo
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mel O&#039;Drama" data-source="post: 372903" data-attributes="member: 23"><p>Yes. In the case of the exchange in that video, the immediate counter that "women were unsuccessful" alludes to victimhood and oppression: as if the biggest tragedy is the poor women instead of the men who've ended their lives. </p><p></p><p></p><p>The reporting on this story continues to frame it as misogyny (as of this morning, reactions to Laurence Fox's "wouldn't shag her" comment are the #1 most-read story on <a href="https://www.bbc.co.uk/news" target="_blank">BBC News</a>.) However, not one article I've read on any news outlet has given the context of the Politics Live show where she stamped all over the very idea that men have a right to a voice or support. If genders were reversed and two men had tried to make a discussion of challenges faced by women all about themselves the conversation wouldn't have been forgotten so quickly. </p><p></p><p>I'm repeating myself here, but it's incredibly frustrating that Fox couldn't air his anger more appropriately, because how she's being reported to be the victim.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Shocking. Some very telling comments. Like the woman who projected that "so-called men's rights groups" are hate-groups.</p><p></p><p>Oh, and...</p><p>"We're not super-interested in talking to you, first of all, but basically we're here to shut down an event."</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>And smiling through it.</p><p></p><p>There's no attempt to conceal the enjoyment of the ugly stuff being said. All in the name of combatting hate speech.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mel O'Drama, post: 372903, member: 23"] Yes. In the case of the exchange in that video, the immediate counter that "women were unsuccessful" alludes to victimhood and oppression: as if the biggest tragedy is the poor women instead of the men who've ended their lives. The reporting on this story continues to frame it as misogyny (as of this morning, reactions to Laurence Fox's "wouldn't shag her" comment are the #1 most-read story on [url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news]BBC News[/url].) However, not one article I've read on any news outlet has given the context of the Politics Live show where she stamped all over the very idea that men have a right to a voice or support. If genders were reversed and two men had tried to make a discussion of challenges faced by women all about themselves the conversation wouldn't have been forgotten so quickly. I'm repeating myself here, but it's incredibly frustrating that Fox couldn't air his anger more appropriately, because how she's being reported to be the victim. Shocking. Some very telling comments. Like the woman who projected that "so-called men's rights groups" are hate-groups. Oh, and... "We're not super-interested in talking to you, first of all, but basically we're here to shut down an event." And smiling through it. There's no attempt to conceal the enjoyment of the ugly stuff being said. All in the name of combatting hate speech. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who played JR Ewing?
Post reply
Forums
News & Politics
US Politics
#metoo
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top