Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Frank Underwood" data-source="post: 444007" data-attributes="member: 35">Based on the psychologists&#039; findings, she didn&#039;t have &quot;acute psychosis&quot; at the time of the murders.&nbsp; It sounded more like a classic case of murder and (attempted) suicide.And as with the fan club she&#039;s attracted, the reason they weren&#039;t convinced appears to be gender bias.&nbsp; The attack on the lone holdout also appears to support this.&nbsp; I find the level of entitlement expressed by Clancy&#039;s lawyer and the remaining eleven jurors disturbing.&nbsp; Even some in the media have piled on, but it wasn&#039;t his duty to appease them.I find them relevant, especially when so many of Clancy&#039;s supporters are blaming the killing of her children on &quot;the patriarchy.&quot;It&#039;s pretty clear that they wouldn&#039;t be so sympathetic towards a man with a similar &quot;psychotic break&quot; defense.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Frank Underwood, post: 444007, member: 35"] Based on the psychologists' findings, she didn't have "acute psychosis" at the time of the murders. It sounded more like a classic case of murder and (attempted) suicide. And as with the fan club she's attracted, the reason they weren't convinced appears to be gender bias. The attack on the lone holdout also appears to support this. I find the level of entitlement expressed by Clancy's lawyer and the remaining eleven jurors disturbing. Even some in the media have piled on, but it wasn't his duty to appease them. I find them relevant, especially when so many of Clancy's supporters are blaming the killing of her children on "the patriarchy." It's pretty clear that they wouldn't be so sympathetic towards a man with a similar "psychotic break" defense. [/QUOTE]

Verification

6 + 4 =