The forum is about to undergo some crucial server updates

There may be a little downtime, but we'll be back online as soon as possible.

Watch this thread for updates

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Spooky Owl!" data-source="post: 433272" data-attributes="member: 57984">Sadly, yes. Reece Witherspoon is encouraging Hollywood to embrace A.I., despite its reluctance, because that's how movies will be made in the future, like it or not. (But she's evil in her own right).That technology is now so advanced, it will just render Hollywood product even more irrelevant than it's already become.One shudders about what could become of Hollywood classics, how altered they could be (by your 4-year-old niece!) But when you think about replacing Donna Reed's head and voice with BBG's, correcting the dream scenario, and adjusting the final three years of DALLAS --- or undoing the re-casting of all the grown Carrington children, and bringing down the pitch of Krystle's voice to its original levels -- the Dark Side starts to seduce and take over.And that can be a problem.<img src="http://yoursmiles.org/tsmile/tears/t2339.gif"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":cry:" title="Cry    :cry:" data-shortname=":cry:" />,</blockquote>