Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="JR-Rules" data-source="post: 302416" data-attributes="member: 60">I second that!!Actually, when I buy DVD/Blu Ray I really enjoy all the bonus materials! But I guess, when you&#039;re a fan, you&#039;re interested by all the extra stuff which allows us a better understanding of the film, or about the director vision, why did he did this or that...I really have no idea what line would have been unacceptable. The only line (or, I must say, word) I remember had a (little) change occurs when Martin is with his son who mimics his father. At the end Martin is asking for a kiss. In the 1975 french dubbing they translate that as a &quot;hug&quot;, in 2004 they translate with the correct word.I know we used to have the same &quot;french voice&quot; for big stars so it&#039;s pretty frustrating when a star actor is not dubbed as usual. In that case I just tought the 1st dubbing was simply perfect. One exemple: when Robert Shaw is telling us the &quot;USS Indianapolis&quot; story, we&#039;re in immersion, focused, with a perfect voice, a deep voice, a &quot;darker&quot; voice who left us totally hooked until the end.SURE! By the way, In each of my watch I can&#039;t do otherwise but pointing out (minor, funny) inconsistencies. I really like to find inconsistencies in movies because I really think it&#039;s too hard to always match the initial script because we&#039;re watching a film for 2 hours but sometimes it takes weeks between two scenes. For exemple they can shoot an interior scene one day and the next scene (exterior scene for exemple) weeks after that.Do you do that?? And what are the inconsistencies you can&#039;t help but take note?Mine are about the killing dates, barrels and and and and... the Quint chair!!What the hell did they do with that chair to make it disappear in a heartbeat? <img src="http://www.sherv.net/cm/emo/laughing/rolling-lol.gif"&nbsp; class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":rlol:" title="Roll lol&nbsp; &nbsp; :rlol:" data-shortname=":rlol:" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="JR-Rules, post: 302416, member: 60"] I second that!! Actually, when I buy DVD/Blu Ray I really enjoy all the bonus materials! But I guess, when you're a fan, you're interested by all the extra stuff which allows us a better understanding of the film, or about the director vision, why did he did this or that... I really have no idea what line would have been unacceptable. The only line (or, I must say, word) I remember had a (little) change occurs when Martin is with his son who mimics his father. At the end Martin is asking for a kiss. In the 1975 french dubbing they translate that as a "hug", in 2004 they translate with the correct word. I know we used to have the same "french voice" for big stars so it's pretty frustrating when a star actor is not dubbed as usual. In that case I just tought the 1st dubbing was simply perfect. One exemple: when Robert Shaw is telling us the "USS Indianapolis" story, we're in immersion, focused, with a perfect voice, a deep voice, a "darker" voice who left us totally hooked until the end. SURE! By the way, In each of my watch I can't do otherwise but pointing out (minor, funny) inconsistencies. I really like to find inconsistencies in movies because I really think it's too hard to always match the initial script because we're watching a film for 2 hours but sometimes it takes weeks between two scenes. For exemple they can shoot an interior scene one day and the next scene (exterior scene for exemple) weeks after that. Do you do that?? And what are the inconsistencies you can't help but take note? Mine are about the killing dates, barrels and and and and... the Quint chair!! What the hell did they do with that chair to make it disappear in a heartbeat? :rlol: [/QUOTE]

Verification

6 + 4 =