Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Jason73" data-source="post: 378013" data-attributes="member: 3">I&#039;ve been making my way through Tribunal Justice.&nbsp; It&#039;s an interesting enough twist on courtroom shows to hold my interest.&nbsp; As mentioned earlier in the thread, the peek into the deliberation process is the best aspect of this show.&nbsp; I do find with three judges, the poor litigants sometimes barely get the chance to present their cases, especially in the episodes where the judges seem to have decided ahead of time they don&#039;t like one or both of the litigants and are intent on grandstanding rather than listening.&nbsp; I keep going back and forth between Tanya and Patricia, as to who is my favorite.&nbsp; I think most of the time it&#039;s Patricia because she amuses me, but I find Tanya&#039;s insights and points of view during deliberation interesting quite frequently.&nbsp; I&#039;d like to know how much deliberation and planning the three judges do together prior to the episode being filmed.&nbsp; A side note: There was a handsome, long haired guy in the audience (to the far right behind the defendant) that I enjoyed keeping an eye on during episodes.&nbsp; He mostly seemed bored with everything.&nbsp; But he hasn&#039;t been around for a while now.&nbsp; (I&#039;m up to episode 64.)</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Jason73, post: 378013, member: 3"] I've been making my way through Tribunal Justice. It's an interesting enough twist on courtroom shows to hold my interest. As mentioned earlier in the thread, the peek into the deliberation process is the best aspect of this show. I do find with three judges, the poor litigants sometimes barely get the chance to present their cases, especially in the episodes where the judges seem to have decided ahead of time they don't like one or both of the litigants and are intent on grandstanding rather than listening. I keep going back and forth between Tanya and Patricia, as to who is my favorite. I think most of the time it's Patricia because she amuses me, but I find Tanya's insights and points of view during deliberation interesting quite frequently. I'd like to know how much deliberation and planning the three judges do together prior to the episode being filmed. A side note: There was a handsome, long haired guy in the audience (to the far right behind the defendant) that I enjoyed keeping an eye on during episodes. He mostly seemed bored with everything. But he hasn't been around for a while now. (I'm up to episode 64.) [/QUOTE]

Verification

Who played JR Ewing?