Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Toni" data-source="post: 411163" data-attributes="member: 82">Of course, she has an opinion about Emma Samms as Fallon...Oh, darling, let’s talk about the absolute disaster of Emma Samms stepping in to replace Pamela Sue Martin in &quot;The Colbys.&quot; What were they thinking?A Major Misstep!First of all, Pamela brought such charisma and depth to her role. She was a firecracker! And then we get Emma, who felt like a wet blanket! It was a downgrade of epic proportions. I mean, really—who thought this was a good idea?Where’s the Spark?Emma’s portrayal lacked the pizzazz that made the character so memorable! She didn’t have that fierce energy that kept viewers glued to the screen. It was like watching a shadow of what could have been. I wanted drama and flair, not someone who seemed lost in a sea of glitter!No Chemistry and No Depth!And the chemistry with other characters? Hrumph! It was as if she didn’t even bother! She should have been heating things up, but instead, she was just… there. It felt flat and forced, making every scene feel like a chore rather than the captivating drama we craved.In Conclusion:Emma Samms stepping in for Pamela Sue Martin was like trying to replace a diamond with a dull rock. Hrumph![ATTACH=full]54579[/ATTACH]&nbsp; [ATTACH=full]54580[/ATTACH]</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Toni, post: 411163, member: 82"] Of course, she has an opinion about Emma Samms as Fallon... [I]Oh, darling, let’s talk about the absolute disaster of Emma Samms stepping in to replace Pamela Sue Martin in "The Colbys." What were they thinking?[/I] [B]A Major Misstep![/B] First of all, Pamela brought such charisma and depth to her role. She was a firecracker! And then we get Emma, who felt like a wet blanket! It was a downgrade of epic proportions. I mean, really—who thought this was a good idea? [B]Where’s the Spark?[/B] Emma’s portrayal lacked the pizzazz that made the character so memorable! She didn’t have that fierce energy that kept viewers glued to the screen. It was like watching a shadow of what could have been. I wanted drama and flair, not someone who seemed lost in a sea of glitter! [B]No Chemistry and No Depth![/B] And the chemistry with other characters? [I]Hrumph![/I] It was as if she didn’t even bother! She should have been heating things up, but instead, she was just… there. It felt flat and forced, making every scene feel like a chore rather than the captivating drama we craved. [B]In Conclusion:[/B] Emma Samms stepping in for Pamela Sue Martin was like trying to replace a diamond with a dull rock. [I]Hrumph![/I] [CENTER][ATTACH type="full" alt="1728656609858.png"]54579[/ATTACH] [ATTACH type="full" alt="1728656672811.png"]54580[/ATTACH][/CENTER] [/QUOTE]

Verification

Who played JR Ewing?