Menu
Forums
New posts
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Awards
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Poison your name this Hallowe'en
There's plenty of time to choose your spooky October username
Click here for more details
Forums
Dynasty
Dynasty
Why has Grey's Anatomy succeeded where 80s soaps failed?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Willie Oleson" data-source="post: 72118" data-attributes="member: 8"><p>When one Important Doctor goes away, another Important Doctor appears. The difference is that new characters on GA don't need a storyline, at least not a storyline to introduce the characters. They only have to be a doctor or patient.</p><p>New characters in family sagas need more relevance (history or future), and I don't think they were only added to fill the void left by other characters. True, some changes were painfully obvious, like new daughter Amanda.</p><p></p><p>A continuing story that focusses on a relatively small group of characters (the family) is a limited concept.</p><p>Like Susan Sullivan said when she had left Falcon Crest: I had suffered all the sufferings, there simply wasn't anything left.</p><p>Many of the 80s soap characters were both the "doctor" and the "patient".</p><p></p><p>Btw, I think GA became a hit-show because they had all these freak-y and gore-y accidents, not necessarily because it was a soap.</p><p>I loved Meredith and Christina's cleverness, and how they always found a way - no matter how obscure - to cure the patient. In essence, it was the "hospital version" of L.A. Law.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Willie Oleson, post: 72118, member: 8"] When one Important Doctor goes away, another Important Doctor appears. The difference is that new characters on GA don't need a storyline, at least not a storyline to introduce the characters. They only have to be a doctor or patient. New characters in family sagas need more relevance (history or future), and I don't think they were only added to fill the void left by other characters. True, some changes were painfully obvious, like new daughter Amanda. A continuing story that focusses on a relatively small group of characters (the family) is a limited concept. Like Susan Sullivan said when she had left Falcon Crest: I had suffered all the sufferings, there simply wasn't anything left. Many of the 80s soap characters were both the "doctor" and the "patient". Btw, I think GA became a hit-show because they had all these freak-y and gore-y accidents, not necessarily because it was a soap. I loved Meredith and Christina's cleverness, and how they always found a way - no matter how obscure - to cure the patient. In essence, it was the "hospital version" of L.A. Law. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
6 + 4 =
Post reply
Forums
Dynasty
Dynasty
Why has Grey's Anatomy succeeded where 80s soaps failed?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top