Batman "The Worst Is Yet To Come": Rewatching Batman '66

Mel O'Drama

Admin
LV
12
 
Messages
13,453
Solutions
1
Reaction score
27,331
Awards
29
Member Since
28th September 2008
The Green Hornet crossover was kind of fun. I've never seen the series and so am the viewer for whom this is a taster rather than the titillation of seeing favourite things coming together. I quite like what I've seen, but at the same time I don't feel I'm missing out from not watching The Green Hornet. Van Williams's handsome looks seemed quite contemporary to my eyes.

It did a nice job of bringing the two together, I think. This is the only time I can think of where there hasn't been a billed "Guest villain" so my expectations of these episodes' villainy was low, but I found Roger C. Carmel's Colonel Gumm very entertaining.



My favourite line of recent episodes came from Catwoman to her henchman as they robbed priceless gems at gunpoint:

Pack up those baubles in your old kit bag

It's terrible. Groan-inducing in its corniness. Which is exactly why I laughed so much.
 

Seaviewer

Telly Talk Champion
LV
7
 
Messages
4,948
Reaction score
8,649
Awards
16
Location
Australia
Member Since
14 September 2001
The Green Hornet crossover was kind of fun. I've never seen the series and so am the viewer for whom this is a taster rather than the titillation of seeing favourite things coming together. I quite like what I've seen, but at the same time I don't feel I'm missing out from not watching The Green Hornet. Van Williams's handsome looks seemed quite contemporary to my eyes.
I'm not sure but I don't think The Green Hornet has ever aired here - apart from one episode years later in a "Golden Years of Television" presentation. I did finally see the whole series much more recently on DVD. It's solid crime-fighter entertainment but is played much straighter than Batman. Comparable perhaps to the George Reeves Superman series in tone.

The Hornet's appearances on Batman are somewhat inconsistent. In one early episode Bruce and Dick are watching the show on TV, so he is only a TV character. Then he pops out in a wall gag, and Batman welcomes him to Gotham City as a fellow crimefighter. The we have the full-blown crossover, and Batman now believes, along with everyone else, the cover story that The Green Hornet and Kato are criminals.
 

Mel O'Drama

Admin
LV
12
 
Messages
13,453
Solutions
1
Reaction score
27,331
Awards
29
Member Since
28th September 2008
I'm not sure but I don't think The Green Hornet has ever aired here - apart from one episode years later in a "Golden Years of Television" presentation.

It's quite possible it never aired here either. I certainly don't remember being aware of any repeats when I was young.


It's solid crime-fighter entertainment but is played much straighter than Batman. Comparable perhaps to the George Reeves Superman series in tone.

Interesting. Especially with it having the same producer. I've watched a little of the first episode and yes, the tone is very different. Which is even more incredible considering the similarities: not only the dynamics of the two crimefighters, but also the episode title style, the occasional on-screen logo and Dozier's narration.


In one early episode Bruce and Dick are watching the show on TV, so he is only a TV character.

That rings bells, but it didn't really register with me as I watched so I couldn't have been paying enough attention.


Then he pops out in a wall gag, and Batman welcomes him to Gotham City as a fellow crimefighter. The we have the full-blown crossover, and Batman now believes, along with everyone else, the cover story that The Green Hornet and Kato are criminals.

Yes, I'd noticed the difference in outlook there. The criminal cover looks fun. Is it deliberately set up that way by the pair or is it more like The Fugitive or The Incredible Hulk?
 

Seaviewer

Telly Talk Champion
LV
7
 
Messages
4,948
Reaction score
8,649
Awards
16
Location
Australia
Member Since
14 September 2001
Catwoman would be the exception for me. Her Selena Kyle identity in many ways is a distorted version of Bruce Wayne. The duality and the pull between dark and light made sense and enriched the character for me. That said, I think the TV show does a nice job of capturing the shared attraction between them in a simpler way.
I must say that I didn't mind the version of Catwoman in Batman: The Animated Series, as a sort of eco-warrior/animal rights activist whose crimes are justified by a higher purpose - at least in her own mind. Bruce can even sympathise with her goals even though his own code requires him to take her in.

The criminal cover looks fun. Is it deliberately set up that way by the pair or is it more like The Fugitive or The Incredible Hulk?
It's a deliberate set-up. It allows him to get close to the real criminals as one of them. He is really Britt Reid, a wealthy newspaper publisher, which I guess is like a combination of Bruce Wayne's and Clark Kent's everyday identities. The only people that know the secret are his secretary at the paper and the DA. Why nobody ever the connects the fact that both The Hornet and Reid have Asian assistants named Kato, I don't know.
 

Mel O'Drama

Admin
LV
12
 
Messages
13,453
Solutions
1
Reaction score
27,331
Awards
29
Member Since
28th September 2008
I was expecting a noticeable drop in quality with Season Three but, seven episodes in, there's nothing that's spoilt my viewing.

The change in format has taken a little adjustment. I miss the daft cliffhangers. They still crop up, but mid-episode and without Dozier's wonderfully bombastic narration. Curiously, even a two-parter featuring the Penguin didn't have a proper cliffhanger. The teasers at the end of each episode with a cameo by the next episode's villain are a very nice touch. That, I have been enjoying.

If anything, the single episode stories have held my interest more. The pace is necessarily faster but they haven't felt rushed to me even though the stories (such as they are) move along nicely.

Season Three's villains have been fun. Frank Gorshin's triumphant final outing as the Riddler was a nice treat. I almost wish they'd held his episode off until later in the season so there was more balance, but after an absence of almost eighteen months who can blame them for wanting to use him almost right away. Perhaps they were hoping he would return for a second episode later in the year. Joan Collins as his ambitious secret weapon scores for being promoted to Special Guest Villainess by the next episode. And great fun she was too. It's easy to find parallels with her rapid ascendence to power on Dynasty. With the Riddler as Cecil Colby (which I suppose makes Batman Blake). Lola Lasagne was enjoyable. If anyone could almost steal the limelight from Burgess Meredith it's Ethel Merman. King Tut is perhaps the villain to have benefitted most from the single episode format. I've enjoyed him but in earlier appearances I invariably started mentally tuning out quite quickly for some reason. That wasn't an issue here.

Batgirl's arrival on the scene has breathed new life into the series. I can understand why West and Ward weren't keen on Yvonne Craig changing the on-screen dynamic, but having her as a kind of lone wolf who shows up randomly and disappears has mitigated this. Whether she's improved things is a matter for debate, but the changes certainly work. I particularly enjoy the new level of secret identity fun with Alfred knowing who she is but not sharing that information with his employers.

Coming up soon I have two classics: The surfboard Joker episode and The Londinium three-parter. I remember finding the Joker episode particularly dire when I was younger so I'm curious what I'll make of it now.
 

Seaviewer

Telly Talk Champion
LV
7
 
Messages
4,948
Reaction score
8,649
Awards
16
Location
Australia
Member Since
14 September 2001
Curiously, even a two-parter featuring the Penguin didn't have a proper cliffhanger.
I found it quite odd that they still did multi-parters. I'm guessing that maybe they were re-written from scripts intended for the old format.

Joan Collins as his ambitious secret weapon scores for being promoted to Special Guest Villainess by the next episode. And great fun she was too. It's easy to find parallels with her rapid ascendence to power on Dynasty.
Interesting observation.

the new level of secret identity fun with Alfred knowing who she is but not sharing that information with his employers.
Alfred accidentally leaning Barbara's secret was really a little too much, I thought. Even for a show that thrived on the absurd.
 

Mel O'Drama

Admin
LV
12
 
Messages
13,453
Solutions
1
Reaction score
27,331
Awards
29
Member Since
28th September 2008
We're freewheeling towards the end now, with just four episodes to watch. The last story I watched was the Shame two-parter featuring the gloriously-named Frontier Fanny. It only dawned on me in the latter episode that Cliff Robertson would go on to be Peter Parker's Uncle Ben in Sam Raimi's Spider-Man films.

Season Three has continued to be an enjoyable journey. The relative brevity of the season had helped. Perhaps my lower expectations were a factor too.

Even the dafter situations have been fun. There've been a few telling signs of the times. The Shame episode featured a stereotypical-looking Native American and Mexican played, apparently, by caucasian actors wearing bronze makeup. Even on this series it's not the first time it's happened. I recall a chief in an earlier episode along the lines of Charles Hawtrey in Carry On Cowboy. The native American in the latter episode is more Bernard Bresslaw. One scene from this episode appears on YouTube titled "Racist Batman Scene" and, while I'm neither doubting nor advocating the dubiously dated nature of this custom, the scene in question is, as far as I can see, fairly standard. If anything, it highlights the surreal nature of it, since the Mexican character can clearly be heard speaking in a Jacob Rees-Mogg voice.

In the same vein, there's been something approaching social commentary, with the episode Nora Clavicle And The Ladies' Crime Club taking aim at the then-nascent Women's Lib movement. The plot involves the titular character getting Commissioner Gordon sacked so she may take his place. She also gets Chief O'Hara replaced with a female friend of hers and they go on to replace the entire Gotham Police Force with women in nicely fitted uniforms (more Carry On influence here, perhaps. It's rather reminiscent of Cabby).

And the reason? They know that women will be far less competent than men which will allow them to get away with their schemes. Indeed, we go on to see a bank robbery taking place under the nose of female officers. The one inside the bank is too busy using a compact and applying makeup to respond, while the two officers outside the bank (each holding a brightly coloured rolling pin) are involved in exchanging recipes. The police switchboard is flashing like crazy, but the woman operating it is oblivious as she's calling all cars to tell them about a great sale that's just started.

The grand plot involves Nora's plan to destroy Gotham City and get a huge insurance payout. She aims to achieve this using thousands of clockwork mice, each containing a small charge. And so we cut to scenes of terrified female officers standing on desks and chairs and swooning into dead faints at the sight of the mice. It's kind of terrible but also riotously funny, perhaps even more so in this MeToo saturated world than it was then. Even Batgirl - the series' symbol of girl power and liberation - earnestly observes that with women running the force Nora's plan is likely to succeed.

The mid-episode cliffhanger, too, is one of the most implicitly sexist. The heroic trio are bound into a human knot which will only get tighter if they move a muscle. Batgirl is practically sitting on Batman's lap, while at the same time facing Robin's groin with her leg up over his shoulder.




Batman starts to free them by wiggling his ears and ordering Robin to wiggle one of his fingers (quite shocking if one stops to consider where Robin's hands are). Given West and Ward's reputation as ladies' men, one can only imagine the kind of antics that were taking place on set that day.

The denouement is appropriately daft, with Batman, Robin and Batgirl using flutes, Pied Piper style, to charm the mice into the water.




I found it quite odd that they still did multi-parters. I'm guessing that maybe they were re-written from scripts intended for the old format.

I enjoyed most of Season Three's multi-parters, but found it odd that most of them were missing the "Same Bat-Time..." cliffhangers. It's as though the new edict of the storyline being wrapped up but having a little teaser for the next episode still applied. Being in amongst the single storyline episodes, the two and three parters should have felt like big events but they were mostly indistinguishable. I also miss the rhyming two-part episode titles.

Alfred accidentally leaning Barbara's secret was really a little too much, I thought. Even for a show that thrived on the absurd.

I know what you mean. My school of thought around it is that anything that gives Alfred a bit more involvement is a good thing.
 

Seaviewer

Telly Talk Champion
LV
7
 
Messages
4,948
Reaction score
8,649
Awards
16
Location
Australia
Member Since
14 September 2001
The relative brevity of the season had helped.
It's really not that much shorter in terms of weeks. Don't forget that the series originally aired twice a week - hence my likening of the episodes to hour shows cut in half. The third season only aired once a week, making the retention of multi-parters even more incongruous.
 

Mel O'Drama

Admin
LV
12
 
Messages
13,453
Solutions
1
Reaction score
27,331
Awards
29
Member Since
28th September 2008
My little Bat-jaunt came to an end last night with the final few episodes and most of the blu-ray bonus features.

Fun as it was to see Zsa Zsa Gabor "daaaaaalink"ing her way through the final episode, there was a definite sense of the unfinished. I've watched before, of course and knew the form. But there was a little part of me that hoped it would feel more of an appropriate ending than I remembered.

Ida Lupino and Howard Duff releasing the series' primary arch villains (or their body doubles) from prison in the penultimate episode really makes me wish they'd gone all out and blown the budget on a final, hour long episode featuring all the top names. It would probably have ended the same way as that half hour episode - with the villains out cold and on their way back to the pokey - but it would certainly have taken the series out with a bang. But it's probable they weren't even sure that the season finale would be the end of the series.



It's really not that much shorter in terms of weeks. Don't forget that the series originally aired twice a week - hence my likening of the episodes to hour shows cut in half. The third season only aired once a week, making the retention of multi-parters even more incongruous.

I'm sure the third season's changes were pretty drastic for viewers during the show's first US airing, but that aspect has only ever been theoretical for me. The series had long ended by the time I was born and so I've only ever seen repeats which probably didn't pay much heed to the patterns of the original airing.
 

Seaviewer

Telly Talk Champion
LV
7
 
Messages
4,948
Reaction score
8,649
Awards
16
Location
Australia
Member Since
14 September 2001
Fun as it was to see Zsa Zsa Gabor "daaaaaalink"ing her way through the final episode,
I can never quite remember whether it's Zsa Zsa or Eva.
But it's probable they weren't even sure that the season finale would be the end of the series.
According to the previously cited Official Bat-book, they were trying to get picked up by another network. Unfortunately, an offer came just too late - after the sets had been torn down - and it was not considered worth the expense of rebuilding them.
 

Willie Oleson

Telly Talk Schemer
LV
8
 
Messages
19,121
Reaction score
33,010
Awards
22
Location
Plotville, Shenanigan
Member Since
April 2002
You shake a pretty mean cape, Batman
says femme fatale played by Jill St. John.

I'm currently alternating between DALLAS and SISTERS but I watched the first BATMAN episode (part 1) out of sheer curiosity.
After all, what's the point of buying all these DVDs and then not use them whenever I feel like it.

"the worst is yet to come".
Oh boy. Something tells me I need to approach this series moderately because binge-watching is going to make me feel burned out before I can finish the first season.
I've never been able to sink my teeth into the superhero genre and the main reason I bought the DVD is for the typically sixties eye-popping visuals - in that regard it certainly doesn't disappoint.
Whereas the Tim Burton movies (my first Batman experience) explain how the villains come about it appears that the rivalry between Batman and the villains of Gotham City has already been established, which suggests that this series mostly caters to fans of the DC comic books instead of the more casual viewer like me.
Not that that doesn't make any sense, but it's not completely without ramifications from my personal point of view.

I feel I constantly need to catch up on everything that's already supposed to make sense, and things are moving very fast and it's all panic-y and high-stakes from the very opening scenes.
1649603685444.png

!!

This first episode feels kinda plot-less. There's the Riddler villain doing or pretending to do something villainous for no other reason than to provoke Batman and then Batman himself can't afford to ignore it.
Then there's Robin who acts as if he's overdosed on Red Bull but maybe the frenetic acting, dialogue and sequences help to disguise the lack of plot.

Even though I'm a sucker for kitsch I thought the red bat-shaped phone in the batmobile was a bit too much.
The series (or at least this episode) doesn't come across as dated camp or unintentional camp. Everything looks exactly the way it is supposed to look and I think it takes a bit of retro-fun out of it.
And yet, if the idea was to change Batman from comic book medium to TV series medium they really can't be faulted for anything.

I'll keep watching to see how bad it's going to get therefore the "worst is yet to come" cliff hanger sounds very promising.
But I have to say that the actor playing the Riddler is really something to behold - and he blows Jim Carrey's version completely out of the water.
 

Mel O'Drama

Admin
LV
12
 
Messages
13,453
Solutions
1
Reaction score
27,331
Awards
29
Member Since
28th September 2008
Glad to hear you're dipping into the series, Willie.


the main reason I bought the DVD is for the typically sixties eye-popping visuals - in that regard it certainly doesn't disappoint.

And it will continue to be that way. Everything about the aesthetics screams pop art meets four colour comic meets Sixties psychedelia.


Whereas the Tim Burton movies (my first Batman experience) explain how the villains come about it appears that the rivalry between Batman and the villains of Gotham City has already been established, which suggests that this series mostly caters to fans of the DC comic books instead of the more casual viewer like me.

This series was my introduction to Batman and the world of Gotham, and I'd say I got to know the characters through this series without picking up a comic or watching any of the films.

Of course, today we're used to nuance and backstory and motivation in superhero material, but this series is more like a Punch & Judy show where the few characters trademarks and associated motifs are explained in a few lines, then they just get on with doing their thing. You could say it's the case that the series' villains and their motives are so simplistic that delving into origins would detract from that.

It's a character-driven show in the broadest sense: everything is larger than life and outlandish, but the characters respond in a way that's true to the characters and deadpan their way through it, tongues firmly in cheek. Unconditional acceptance of such wackiness is a big ask, but that really is how you'll enjoy it most. I view it as a broad Sixties sitcom that just happens to be about a superhero in the same way Bewitched's Samantha just happens to be a witch.



things are moving very fast and it's all panic-y and high-stakes from the very opening scenes.

Yes - the bombast is all part of the fun.



the frenetic acting, dialogue and sequences help to disguise the lack of plot.

The entire series could actually be sold on this tagline to explain its appeal.


Even though I'm a sucker for kitsch I thought the red bat-shaped phone in the batmobile was a bit too much.

Well if you think that's a bit much... stay tuned. ;)



But I have to say that the actor playing the Riddler is really something to behold - and he blows Jim Carrey's version completely out of the water.

Doesn't he just?

Frank Gorshin's performance is incredible. He's so intense and plays Riddler as completely unhinged and psychotic. There's a real darkness behind the colourful costume. He's one of the best things in this series for my money.
 

Willie Oleson

Telly Talk Schemer
LV
8
 
Messages
19,121
Reaction score
33,010
Awards
22
Location
Plotville, Shenanigan
Member Since
April 2002
Oh look, the girth of Bruce's pole is bigger than Dick's.
1649633737387.png


My favourite gimmick is that every unique device name is put on signs and cards and whatnot. Only Bruce and Dick need to know how to get access to the Batcave and you'd think that they would simply know.

But then again, with so many sneaky devices to choose from it's very important not to activate the wrong one.
1649634272132.png


The Batman language is very entertaining even though I'm not familiar with all the expressions (I suspect the writers have given themselves some leeway here) but it's not very difficult to get the gist of it.
It appears they also kept the comic books speech bubbles to describe everything that's happening but of course it's completely useless in motion picture.
It's all over-the-top childish but like I said the flamboyant expressions gives it some class.
The sets and props are fabulous and nicely contrasted by a realistic setting.
1649635993709.png

I also like Tim Burton's idea of Gotham City but not for this series because the absurd sets and absurd setting would cancel each other out.
 

Mel O'Drama

Admin
LV
12
 
Messages
13,453
Solutions
1
Reaction score
27,331
Awards
29
Member Since
28th September 2008
Oh look, the girth of Bruce's pole is bigger than Dick's.

Ha ha. There's much sexual subtext to be found if you keep a keen eye and ear, which clearly you are.


My favourite gimmick is that every unique device name is put on signs and cards and whatnot.

Yes - they conjure up all kinds of surreal images of Batman walking into the printers to get random signs made. Or perhaps Alfred makes them when he's not dusting the Batcave or answering the door at stately Wayne Manor.

And, naturally, the device on hand is always the exact one that's needed for the situation at hand. It feels like a satire of the more convenient little gizmos that appeared in comics of the era. There are several memorable example of this in the 1966 Batman movie (it's not in the DVD set, but if you have access to it I'd highly recommend a watch. It was made between Seasons One and Two and it's a classic).



The Batman language is very entertaining even though I'm not familiar with all the expressions (I suspect the writers have given themselves some leeway here) but it's not very difficult to get the gist of it.
It appears they also kept the comic books speech bubbles to describe everything that's happening but of course it's completely useless in motion picture.
It's all over-the-top childish but like I said the flamboyant expressions gives it some class.

The overexcited narrator is the icing on the cake for me (it's actually Executive Producer William Dozier). It's so perfect.



The sets and props are fabulous and nicely contrasted by a realistic setting.

Yes, they haven't skimped on anything and it was a pretty expensive series to make.
 

Willie Oleson

Telly Talk Schemer
LV
8
 
Messages
19,121
Reaction score
33,010
Awards
22
Location
Plotville, Shenanigan
Member Since
April 2002
Batman’s own origin is given just a passing reference in a line of dialogue from the very first episode and even then it’s rather oblique.
When I watched the very first episode I was wondering why he had chosen the human bat outfit to disguise himself.
It was explained in episode 4 as "nothing so strikes terror into the criminal mind as the shape and shadow of a huge bat".

Hmm, I'm not sure if that makes any sense, but an explanation is an explanation.
 
Last edited:

Mel O'Drama

Admin
LV
12
 
Messages
13,453
Solutions
1
Reaction score
27,331
Awards
29
Member Since
28th September 2008
When I watched the very first episode I was wondering why he had chosen the human bat outfit to disguise himself.
It was explained in episode 4 as "nothing so strikes terror into the criminal mind as the shape and shadow of a huge bat".

Hmm, I'm not sure if that makes any sense, but an explanation is an explanation.

Indeed. And it wasn't really any more complex than that in his first comics appearance where the decision to become a ginormous human bat was explained in just a few panels:

 

Seaviewer

Telly Talk Champion
LV
7
 
Messages
4,948
Reaction score
8,649
Awards
16
Location
Australia
Member Since
14 September 2001
There's the Riddler villain doing or pretending to do something villainous for no other reason than to provoke Batman and then Batman himself can't afford to ignore it.
Watching this as a kid it never occurred to me to wonder why they did anything. The villains all had their own schtick , that's all I needed to know (although I didn't know the word "schtick" at the time).
 

Jock Ewing Fan

Telly Talk Dream Maker
Top Poster Of Month
LV
0
 
Messages
1,682
Reaction score
2,936
Awards
8
Location
USA
Favourite Movie
Indiana Jones
While the show is not the definitive Batman, or consistent with Batman's origins, development, it is an enjoyable version of
hero type satire in the pop 60's, with colorful adversaries.
For me, Adam West is still the voice of Batman.
Cesar Romero, Burgess Meredith and Frank Gorshin would all have been capable of
playing the characters more seriously.
Julie Newmar was cast perfectly.
So many other memorable actors and actresses.
The cameos were fun
 

Willie Oleson

Telly Talk Schemer
LV
8
 
Messages
19,121
Reaction score
33,010
Awards
22
Location
Plotville, Shenanigan
Member Since
April 2002
For me, Adam West is still the voice of Batman
The gayest moment so far happens in the first Joker episode when Bruce tells Dick that learning music is ver important.
1649925734478.png

Kinda like Ted Dinard teaching Steven Carrington how to be an educated and sophisticated gay man, but with an underlying "Village People" sensibility.

Even in this third story it already starts to feel increasingly formulaic but I guess that's part of the joke. Nevertheless, without even a whiff of suspense the episodes can only rely on the gimmicks and the intentional embarrassingly badly staged shenanigans.
It is very funny and I feel this should be my cup of tea, and yet, I'm never laughing. I can't say it disappoints because I had no idea what kind of show it was going to be but at the same time it's hard to ignore my mind-numbing feeling when I watch the episodes.

I don't like the Joker as much as the Riddler and the Penguin, actually I found him quite irritating (even if he's supposed to be irritating he shouldn't irritate me).
All in all, I still struggle to get into it and the fabulous production makes that even more frustrating. I really really want to like this - perhaps what I need is A TRICK! to make that happen.
 
Top