Werewillie Oleson
Telly Talk Schemer
The widescreen universe?I believe TNT's Dallas takes place in an alternate universe

The widescreen universe?I believe TNT's Dallas takes place in an alternate universe

Exactly. The expanded screen format causes all kind of hacky glitches, including retcons, character inconsistencies, and the ripping off of storylines from higher quality shows.The widescreen universe?![]()
Is that what it was? Wow, I had no idea. Looks like we finally got to see the cartel responsible for giving Lucy and Tommy drugs in Lorimar Dallas too. It all makes sense now!Au contraire! It proves that the Rylands and Ramoses already featured in the Lorimar version, but you didn't see them because there wasn't enough screen. The widescreen reveals the true Dallas that it was supposed to be from the very beginning. Hallelujah!
Ignoring and retconning are two different things. You can ignore a storyline from the past by not mentioning it, but that doesn't mean it didn't exist. With a retcon, a piece of the story is removed from the universe, which was the case with the dream season and the reunion movies. I'd say about 95% of TNT's Dallas could be ignored rather than retconning it outright.
You may be right but I don't see why they should be. JR Returns was what "Conundrum" should have been. WOTE was misconceived, it would have been far better to build on the themes of the first one, but not bad as a standalone story. Certainly they both improved on the final season or so.my assumption is Warner Bros. were embarrassed by the Reunion movies.
She failed on both accounts.Or maybe she thought "shall I please every single Dallas fan or shall I create something very exciting?"
Such a tough dilemma.
Pretty much. Although I really liked Josh Henderson's portrayal of John Ross. The kitchen argument between him and Sue Ellen is a particularly powerful scene.The only 2 storylines I liked was the way they honored Larry Hagman on that one episode anyway and the way they wrote out Pam. The rest sucked.
You say that like it would be impossible to do both. At the very least, she could have made the show exciting and pleasing to at least the majority of Dallas fans.Willie Oleson said:Or maybe she thought "shall I please every single Dallas fan or shall I create something very exciting?"
Such a tough dilemma.
Yes, wrong network and wrong showrunner. Both appeared to be chosen arbitrarily by the production company. When it came to showrunners, they should have vetted potential picks.In the end I feel it was a decent three year run. I look forward to reaching it when I get there in my re-watch. The biggest problem is when it was launched. While it isn't perfect, it's so interesting watching the Dynasty reboot with endless tie ins to the original (even though it doesn't require it as a remake) and writers who appreciate the soap opera genre. What hurt this show is that the writers simply despised soaps and that's what they were tasked at writing. Ratings showed that the audience was there, but the writing drove them away. It's a shame because this was it. Had this gone better we may have gotten more seasons, Knots Landing, who knows? For Dallas to be off the air as long as it was and come back to the ratings it did is pretty outstanding. I just wish they had writers who appreciated the genre more. Being on TNT didn't help much either. I wonder how it would've fared on a streaming network.
Whether I enjoyed TNT Dallas or not is relevant. I accept TNT Dallas as part of the ongoing saga of the Ewing family. Why? Because it's there. Just like the decaying Lorimar Dallas and the reunion movies. I just wish I had the money and talent to resurrect a one off series to correct some of the failings of TNT Dallas and give proper closure for the likes of Bobby and Sue Ellen.
But then who is to say my version would be up to the high standards from soapchat members. Some have lofty expectations...and rightly so.
I will always be baffled by this. Where was the harm in embracing the rich tapestry that was Lorimar Dallas? After 14 seasons a continuation of Dallas could easily have drawn on any number of scenarios of what the Ewing family were up to in 2012. I have no beef utilizing the characters of John Ross and Christopher...alongside JR, Sue Ellen, Bobby, Cliff and others. They were the heart and soul of Dallas.Sadly, TNT Dallas rarely embraced its heritage
Yes, not much mystery to it all. The only thing I am baffled by is why Cidre was chosen in the first place. Her previous show flopped, and she didn't exactly have a notable body of work. I don't doubt that the executives only cared about the name recognition (why else put it on procedural network like TNT?) Still, I'd love to know why they chose Cidre to helm the show. Even she seemed surprised, having admitted to being familiar with very little of the original series. It's a shame that they didn't try to lure David Paulsen out of retirement.It's a 21st century female producer who wanted to write about the maid and the maid's daughter, and Bobby's new Desperate Housewives' wife and that wife's ex and his mother.
Why does Cidre need to address the original show or sufficiently familiarize herself with it? TNT wanted name-recognition, and Cidre wanted a show to produce. There's not much mystery to it.
Most continuations don't work for essentially the same reasons.
And Bradford May as Director of Photography...plus David Jacobs as Story Consultant.It's a shame that they didn't try to lure David Paulsen out of retirement.
That's the dream team right there. Instead, they chose to hand one of the most popular television franchises over to a failed writer who was unfamiliar with the show.And Bradford May as Director of Photography...plus David Jacobs as Story Consultant.
I'm sure they never thought of Paulsen at all. They even refused to talk to David Jacobs until that refusal hit the press.Yes, not much mystery to it all. The only thing I am baffled by is why Cidre was chosen in the first place. Her previous show flopped, and she didn't exactly have a notable body of work. I don't doubt that the executives only cared about the name recognition (why else put it on procedural network like TNT?) Still, I'd love to know why they chose Cidre to helm the show. Even she seemed surprised, having admitted to being familiar with very little of the original series. It's a shame that they didn't try to lure David Paulsen out of retirement.