- Awards
- 21
FDA commissioner joins Pfizer board -- of course
- Thread starter Snarky Oracle!
- Start date
- Copy link Copy link
- Awards
- 9
Sounds like a conspiracy theory to me. 
- Awards
- 9
- Awards
- 9
- Awards
- 11
There's conspiracy theories and then there are conspiracy realities.Sounds like a conspiracy theory to me.
- Awards
- 9
I meant that to be tongue in cheek because some people here don't see a conflict of interest between big pharma's ties to government and the mainstream media.
- Awards
- 11
Yes, I knew that. I was agreeing with you in a similar tongue in cheek manner
I like many of your posts because you will really examine an issue
Too many times people are too quick to dismiss something as a "conspiracy theory" without really considering it.
Of course, there is the danger of people spreading misinformation, but dismissing things and labeling them as "crazy conspiracy theories " can also be a form of misinformation.
Last edited:
- Awards
- 9
Soon after the COVID vaccines were made available to the public, we were told by the likes of Joe Biden, CDC Director Rochelle Walensky and Rachel Maddow that the vaccines prevented infection and stopped transmission. Yet recently, during a recent hearing in front of the European Parliament, Pfizer’s President of International Developed Markets Janine Small admitted that the company never tested the company’s vaccine for transmission. Her excuse? The company had to move at the “speed of science” to get the vaccine to market.
We Were Lied To About Vaccines ADMITS Pfizer! - YouTube
We Were Lied To About Vaccines ADMITS Pfizer! - YouTube
- Awards
- 9
A Pfizer exec admitted nefarious deeds in undercover operation, including how the people who are supposed to regulate companies like Pfizer end up working for them.
The Pfizer exec also states "COVID will probably be a cash cow for us for awhile going forward, which I obviously like." He admits this includes mutating the virus, stating "it'd be perfect."
I posted a thread about this elsewhere, but it was reported for "extreme misinformation." Funny how easily "extreme misinformation" can be verified with a Google search.
I'm posting the transcript of the sting operation here. If this still isn't up to the site's standards, feel free to retire my account.
JORDON TRISTAN WALKER: You know how the virus keeps mutating? Well, one of the things we're exploring is, like, why don't we just mutate it ourselves so we could focus on, so we could create… develop new vaccines, right? So, we have to do that. If we're going to do that, though, there's a risk of, like, as you could imagine, no one wants to be having a pharma company mutating f------- viruses. So, we're like, do we want to do this? So, that's, like, one of the things we're considering for, like, the future, like, maybe we're going to create new versions of the vaccine and things like that.
JOURNALIST: OK. So, Pfizer ultimately is thinking about mutating COVID?
WALKER: Well, that is not what we say to the public. No.
JOURNALIST: When is Pfizer going to implement a mutation of all these viruses?
WALKER: I don't know. It depends on how all the experiments work out because this is, like, something we're trying, right?
JOURNALIST: It sounds like gain-of-function to me.
WALKER: I don't know. It's a little bit different. I think it's different. It's like this, it's definitely not gain-of-function.
JOURNALIST: Sounds like it is. I mean, it's OK.
WALKER: No, no, no. Directed evolution is very different.
JOURNALIST: Direct evolution?
WALKER: Directed evolution.
JOURNALIST: Directed evolution, OK. So, I mean, is that what it is then?
WALKER: Maybe. I don't — well, you're not supposed to do gain-of-function research with the viruses. They rather we not, but you do things like selected structural mutations to try to see if you could make it more potent. So, there is research ongoing about that. I don't know how that's going to work. There better not be any more outbreaks because, like, Jesus Christ.
JOURNALIST: Tell me more, like, what's developing with the whole, you know, virus mutation process?
WALKER: Well, they're still kind of conducting experiments on it, but it seems like from what I've heard they're kind of optimizing it, but they're going slow because everyone is very cautious. Obviously, they don't want to accelerate it too much, but I also think they are just trying to do it as an exploratory thing because you obviously don't want to advertise that you're trying to figure out future mutations.
WALKER: You have to be, like, very controlled to make sure that this virus that you mutate doesn't create something that, like, you know, just goes everywhere.
JOURNALIST: Something crazy.
WALKER: …which I suspect is the way the virus started in Wuhan to be honest, like, it makes no sense that this virus popped out of nowhere.
JOURNALIST: Yeah, I know.
WALKER: It's b-------.
JOURNALIST: Isn't that the best business model, though? Like, just control nature before nature even happens itself, right?
WALKER: If it works.
JOURNALIST: What do you mean if it works?
WALKER: Because, like, sometimes there were just mutations that pop up and we're not prepared for it, like with delta or omicron and things like that. So, who knows? I mean, either way, it's going to be a cash cow. COVID will probably be a cash cow for us for awhile going forward, which I obviously like…
JOURNALIST: Well, I think the whole, you know, I think the whole, like, research of the viruses and mutating it, like, would be the ultimate, like, cash cow.
WALKER: Yeah, it’d be perfect.
Walker on the regulatory capture of government:
WALKER: …is a revolving door for all government officials for any industry though. So, in the pharma industry, all the government officials who review our drugs eventually come work for pharma companies and the military… defense government officials eventually go work for the defense companies afterwards.
JOURNALIST: How do you feel about that revolving door?
WALKER: It’s pretty good for the industry to be honest. It’s bad for everybody else in America.
JOURNALIST: Why is it bad for everybody else?
WALKER: Because when the regulators who review our drugs know that once they stop being a regulator, they want to go work for the company, they are not going to be as harsh on the company where they’re getting their job.
Journalist reveals himself and calls out Walker:
JAMES O'KEEFE: You work for Pfizer. My question for you is, why does Pfizer want to hide from the public the fact that they're mutating COVID virus?
WALKER: Is this real life? I'm literally a liar. I was trying to impress a person on a date by lying. This is absurd. Please stop. Why are you doing this to someone who is just working in a company to literally help the public?
JAMES O'KEEFE: Do you want to put me in jail for asking you a question?
WALKER to 911 operator: Yes sir?
O'KEEFE: What is your intention of calling the police?
WALKER: They have like — no one’s injured right now, but we have several witnesses.
O'KEEFE: Can I talk to you please about this video?
WALKER: OK so there’s one, two, three, four, five white people.
O'KEEFE: Why would you bring race into this?
WALKER: Please bring the cops as soon as possible. I’m feeling very unsafe right now.
WALKER: This is insane.
O'KEEFE: Please unlock the door.
WALKER: Give it!
O'KEEFE: Please open the door.
WALKER: You can’t just record people like that! He’s assaulting me! He hit my head! Do not record me. Do not record me!
O'KEEFE: Unlock the door. Unlock the door.
Source: https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/tuc...tand-how-powerful-big-pharma-is-consider-this
The Pfizer exec also states "COVID will probably be a cash cow for us for awhile going forward, which I obviously like." He admits this includes mutating the virus, stating "it'd be perfect."
I posted a thread about this elsewhere, but it was reported for "extreme misinformation." Funny how easily "extreme misinformation" can be verified with a Google search.
I'm posting the transcript of the sting operation here. If this still isn't up to the site's standards, feel free to retire my account.
JORDON TRISTAN WALKER: You know how the virus keeps mutating? Well, one of the things we're exploring is, like, why don't we just mutate it ourselves so we could focus on, so we could create… develop new vaccines, right? So, we have to do that. If we're going to do that, though, there's a risk of, like, as you could imagine, no one wants to be having a pharma company mutating f------- viruses. So, we're like, do we want to do this? So, that's, like, one of the things we're considering for, like, the future, like, maybe we're going to create new versions of the vaccine and things like that.
JOURNALIST: OK. So, Pfizer ultimately is thinking about mutating COVID?
WALKER: Well, that is not what we say to the public. No.
JOURNALIST: When is Pfizer going to implement a mutation of all these viruses?
WALKER: I don't know. It depends on how all the experiments work out because this is, like, something we're trying, right?
JOURNALIST: It sounds like gain-of-function to me.
WALKER: I don't know. It's a little bit different. I think it's different. It's like this, it's definitely not gain-of-function.
JOURNALIST: Sounds like it is. I mean, it's OK.
WALKER: No, no, no. Directed evolution is very different.
JOURNALIST: Direct evolution?
WALKER: Directed evolution.
JOURNALIST: Directed evolution, OK. So, I mean, is that what it is then?
WALKER: Maybe. I don't — well, you're not supposed to do gain-of-function research with the viruses. They rather we not, but you do things like selected structural mutations to try to see if you could make it more potent. So, there is research ongoing about that. I don't know how that's going to work. There better not be any more outbreaks because, like, Jesus Christ.
JOURNALIST: Tell me more, like, what's developing with the whole, you know, virus mutation process?
WALKER: Well, they're still kind of conducting experiments on it, but it seems like from what I've heard they're kind of optimizing it, but they're going slow because everyone is very cautious. Obviously, they don't want to accelerate it too much, but I also think they are just trying to do it as an exploratory thing because you obviously don't want to advertise that you're trying to figure out future mutations.
WALKER: You have to be, like, very controlled to make sure that this virus that you mutate doesn't create something that, like, you know, just goes everywhere.
JOURNALIST: Something crazy.
WALKER: …which I suspect is the way the virus started in Wuhan to be honest, like, it makes no sense that this virus popped out of nowhere.
JOURNALIST: Yeah, I know.
WALKER: It's b-------.
JOURNALIST: Isn't that the best business model, though? Like, just control nature before nature even happens itself, right?
WALKER: If it works.
JOURNALIST: What do you mean if it works?
WALKER: Because, like, sometimes there were just mutations that pop up and we're not prepared for it, like with delta or omicron and things like that. So, who knows? I mean, either way, it's going to be a cash cow. COVID will probably be a cash cow for us for awhile going forward, which I obviously like…
JOURNALIST: Well, I think the whole, you know, I think the whole, like, research of the viruses and mutating it, like, would be the ultimate, like, cash cow.
WALKER: Yeah, it’d be perfect.
Walker on the regulatory capture of government:
WALKER: …is a revolving door for all government officials for any industry though. So, in the pharma industry, all the government officials who review our drugs eventually come work for pharma companies and the military… defense government officials eventually go work for the defense companies afterwards.
JOURNALIST: How do you feel about that revolving door?
WALKER: It’s pretty good for the industry to be honest. It’s bad for everybody else in America.
JOURNALIST: Why is it bad for everybody else?
WALKER: Because when the regulators who review our drugs know that once they stop being a regulator, they want to go work for the company, they are not going to be as harsh on the company where they’re getting their job.
Journalist reveals himself and calls out Walker:
JAMES O'KEEFE: You work for Pfizer. My question for you is, why does Pfizer want to hide from the public the fact that they're mutating COVID virus?
WALKER: Is this real life? I'm literally a liar. I was trying to impress a person on a date by lying. This is absurd. Please stop. Why are you doing this to someone who is just working in a company to literally help the public?
JAMES O'KEEFE: Do you want to put me in jail for asking you a question?
WALKER to 911 operator: Yes sir?
O'KEEFE: What is your intention of calling the police?
WALKER: They have like — no one’s injured right now, but we have several witnesses.
O'KEEFE: Can I talk to you please about this video?
WALKER: OK so there’s one, two, three, four, five white people.
O'KEEFE: Why would you bring race into this?
WALKER: Please bring the cops as soon as possible. I’m feeling very unsafe right now.
WALKER: This is insane.
O'KEEFE: Please unlock the door.
WALKER: Give it!
O'KEEFE: Please open the door.
WALKER: You can’t just record people like that! He’s assaulting me! He hit my head! Do not record me. Do not record me!
O'KEEFE: Unlock the door. Unlock the door.
Source: https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/tuc...tand-how-powerful-big-pharma-is-consider-this
Last edited:
- Awards
- 21
Woody Harrelson under fire for "spreading anti-vax conspiracy theories" after SNL monologue...
Woody Harrelson Tells Truth About COVID On SNL! - YouTube
Woody Harrelson Tells Truth About COVID On SNL! - YouTube
- Awards
- 9
It's funny how everything Woody said is demonstrably true, yet the media can't help but smear him anyway (being the bullshit artists that they are.)
Of course, the media will never be held accountable for lying about the efficacy of masks, vaccines and lockdowns. Why? Because they're "brought to you by Pfizer!"
- Awards
- 21
Woody sums up the problem in America pretty concisely: the corporations are the government, they run everything, and nobody knows what to do about it.
- Awards
- 21
Bobby Junior is running for president.
- Awards
- 9
Most of his views are outside of the establishment, which is why they'll stop him like Bernie. The "pro-democracy" Democrats won't even allow him to debate Biden!
Last edited:
- Awards
- 21
It's already started.
- Awards
- 21
- Awards
- 21
- Awards
- 21
Well, I guess I owe comic Rob Schneider the same apology he gives Dennis Miller, because Schneider turns out to be waaaaaaaaaaaay smarter than I thought he was....
Liberal Rob Schneider Pushes Back Against Wokeness & Pays The Price! w/Rob Schneider - YouTube
Liberal Rob Schneider Pushes Back Against Wokeness & Pays The Price! w/Rob Schneider - YouTube
- Awards
- 9
I've heard about ten minutes of the podcast so far, and everything Schneider has said is spot on. A healthy dose of cynicism and doing research is now considered right wing.
The fact that people like Schneider and Dore are smeared as right wingers just goes to show how the authoritarian, corporatist war pigs perverted what it means to be liberal.
I even have much more common ground with Tucker Carlson today than Rachel Maddow and Keith Olbermann. I never would have imagined that happening ten years ago.
Last edited:
- Awards
- 9
Rob Schneider and Jimmy Dore further discuss authoritarian Democratic policies.
Dore also plays a video of Democrats saying they don't trust the federal government when it comes to the vaccine because Trump was president. They even specifically cite Trump as the reason why. Vaccine skepticism became condemned as a right wing conspiracy theory once Biden and the Dems took over, yet the vaccine remained the same.
Too bad their willing dupe supporters never consider this when accusing people of "muddying the waters" or flat out calling them anti-vax.
Remember When DEMOCRATS Were The Anti-Vaxxers??? w/ Rob Schneider - YouTube
Dore also plays a video of Democrats saying they don't trust the federal government when it comes to the vaccine because Trump was president. They even specifically cite Trump as the reason why. Vaccine skepticism became condemned as a right wing conspiracy theory once Biden and the Dems took over, yet the vaccine remained the same.
Too bad their willing dupe supporters never consider this when accusing people of "muddying the waters" or flat out calling them anti-vax.
Remember When DEMOCRATS Were The Anti-Vaxxers??? w/ Rob Schneider - YouTube
Last edited: